Effectiveness of microsatellite and SNP markers for parentage and identity analysis in species with low genetic diversity: The case of European bison

Heredity

Volumn 103, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 326-332

  Tokarska, M ^a   Marshall, T ^b   Kowalczyk, R ^a   Wojcik J M ^a   Pertoldi, C ^a,c   Kristensen, T N ^c,d   Loeschcke, V ^c   Gregersen, V R ^d   Bendixen, C ^d  

^a MAMMAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

^b Field Genetics Limited   (United Kingdom)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^d DANISH INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Denmark)

Author keywords

BeadChip; Bottleneck; Cervus 3.0.3; European bison; Genetic diversity

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOMESTIC SPECIES; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; MAMMAL; PARENTAGE; PATERNITY; POLYMORPHISM; SIMULATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BUFFALO; EUROPE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BISON; EUROPE; GENETIC VARIATION; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

ANIMALIA; BISON BONASUS; BOVINAE; CERVUS;

EID: 70349481004     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.73     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aitken N, Smith S, Schwarz C, Morin PA (2004). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery in mammals: a targeted-gene approach. Mol Ecol 13: 1423-1431.
2. Barendse W, Armitage SM, Kossarek LM, Shalom A, Kirkpatrick BW, Ryan AM et al. (1994). A genetic linkage map of the bovine genome. Nat Genet 6: 227-235.
3. Bishop MD, Kappes SM, Keele JW (1994). A genetic linkage map for cattle. Genetics 136: 619-639.
4. Bovmap Database (INRA, France) http://locus.jouy.inra.fr/.
5. Clark AG, Hubisz MJ, Bustamante CD, Williamson SH, Nielsen R (2005). Ascertainment bias in studies of human genomewide polymorphism. Genome Res 15: 1496-1502.
6. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (2008): http://www.iucnredlist.org/.
7. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007). Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16: 1099-1106.
8. Krasińska M, Krasiń ski Z (2007). European Bison. The Nature Monograph. MRI PAS: Białowieża. pp 65-90.
9. Marshall TC, Sunnucks P, Spalton JA, Greth A, Pemberton JM (1999). Use of genetic data for conservation management: the case of the Arabian oryx. Anim Conserv 2: 269-278.
10. Morin PA, Luikart G, Wayne RK (2004). SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 208-216.
11. Nielsen RK, Pertoldi C, Loeschcke V (2007). Genetic evaluation of the captive breeding program of the Asiatic wild ass, onager Equus hemionus onager. J Zool 272: 1-9.
12. Nielsen R, Signorovitch J (2003). Correcting for ascertainment biases when analyzing SNP data: applications to the estimation of linkage disequilibrium. Theor Popul Biol 63: 245-255.
13. Olech W (2003). The influence of individual and maternal inbreeding on calf survival in the European bison (Wpływ inbredu osobniczego i inbredu matki na przeżywalność ciela̧t żubra, Polish text with English abstract). Treatises and monographs, Warsaw University of Life Sciences: Warsaw. pp 32-36.
14. Pertoldi C, Wójcik JM, Tokarska M, Kawałko A, Kristensen TN, Loeschcke V et al. (submitted). Depauperate genome variability in the European and American bison detected using the BovineSNP50 Illumina Genotyping BeadChip. Biol Direct.
15. Primmer CR, Borge T, Lindell J, Saetre GP (2002). Single nucleotide polymorphism characterization in species with limited available sequence information: high nucleotide diversity revealed in the avian genome. Mol Ecol 11: 603-612.
16. Pucek Z, Belousova IP, Krasińska M, Krasiń ski ZA, Olech W (2004). European bison. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. In: Pucek Z (ed). IUCN/SSC Bison Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland: Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. p 8.
17. Raczyński J (ed) (2007). European Bison Pedigree Book. Białowieski Park Narodowy: Białowieża. pp 1-6.
18. Ritland K (1996). Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients. Genet Res 67: 175-185.
19. Quader S (2005). Mate choice and its implications for conservation and management. Curr Sci 89: 1220-1229.
20. Russello MA, Amato G (2004). Ex situ population management in the absence of pedigree information. Mol Ecol 13: 2829-2840.
21. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989.) In: Ford N, Nolan, C, Ferguson, M (eds). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, USA. pp 9.16-9.19.
22. Tokarska M, Kawałko A, Wójcik JM, Pertoldi C (in press). Genetic variability in the European bison (Bison bonasus) population from Białowieża forest over fifty years. Biol J Linn Soc.
23. Vignal A, Milan D, SanCristobal M, Eggen A (2002). A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics. Genet Select Evol 34: 275-305.
24. Wilson GA, Olson W, Strobeck C (2002). Reproductive success in wood bison (Bison bison athabascae) established using molecular techniques. Can J Zool 80: 1537-1548.