Floral evolution in the monocot family Nartheciaceae (Dioscoreales): Evidence from anatomy and development in Metanarthecium luteo-viride Maxim.

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 158, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-18

  Remizowa, Margarita ^a   Sokoloff, Dmitry ^a   Kondo, Katsuhiko ^b,c  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aletris; Compitum; Congenital fusion; Gynoecium; Narthecium; Ovary position; Post genital fusion; Prophyll; Septal nectaries; Syncarpy

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; MICROMORPHOLOGY; MICROSCOPY; MONOCOTYLEDON; PHYLOGENETICS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ALETRIS; ALLIUM; ALLIUM SATIVUM; ASPARAGALES; DIOSCOREALES; METANARTHECIUM; METANARTHECIUM LUTEO-VIRIDE; NARTHECIACEAE; NARTHECIUM;

EID: 51249101695     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: 10958339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2008.00850.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ambrose JD. 1980. A re-evaluation of the Melanthioideae (Liliaceae) using numerical analyses. In : Brickell CD, Cutler DF, Gregory M, eds. Petaloid monocotyledons. New York : Academic Press, 65 81.
2. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141 : 399 436.
3. Armbruster WS, Debevec EM, Willson MF. 2002. Evolution of syncarpy in angiosperms: theoretical and phylogenetic analyses of the effects of carpel fusion on offspring quantity and quality. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15 : 657 672.
4. Baum H. 1948. Postgenitale Verwachsung in und zwischen Karpell- und Staubblattkreisen. Sitzungsberichte, Osterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse. Abteilung 1. Biologie, Mineralogie, Erdkunde und verwandte Wissenschaften 157 : 2 38.
5. Caddick LR, Rudall PJ, Wilkin P. 2000. Floral morphology and development in Dioscoreales. Feddes Repertorium 111 : 189 230.
6. Chase MW. 2004. Monocot relationships: an overview. American Journal of Botany 91 : 1645 1655.
7. Chase MW, Fay MF, Devey DS, Maurin O, Rønsted N, Davies J, Pillon Y, Petersen G, Severg O, Tamura MN, Asmussen CB, Hilu K, Borsch T, Davis JI, Stevenson DW, Pires JC, Givnish TJ, Sytsma KJ, McPherson MM, Graham SW, Rai HS. 2006. Multi-gene analyses of monocot relationships: a summary. Aliso 22 : 63 75.
8. Chase MW, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Rudall PJ, Fay MF, Hahn WH, Sullivan S, Joseph J, Givinish TJ, Systma KJ, Pires JC. 2000. Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: an assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. In : Wilson KL, Morrison DA, eds. Monocots: systematics and evolution. Collingwood, Vic. : CSIRO Publishing, 3 16.
9. Czerepanov SK. 1995. Vascular plants of Russia and adjacent states (the former USSR). New York : North American Branch, Cambridge University Press.
10. Dahlgren RM, Clifford HT, Yeo PF. 1985. The families of the monocotyledons. Berlin : Springer.
11. Daumann E. 1970. Das Blütennektarium der Monocotyledonen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner systematischen und phylogenetischen Bedeutung. Feddes Repertorium 80 : 463 590.
12. Doyle JA, Endress PK. 2000. Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal angiosperms: comparison and combination with molecular data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 : S121 S153.
13. Endress PK. 1982. Syncarpy and alternative modes of escaping disadvantages of apocarpy in primitive angiosperms. Taxon 31 : 48 52.
14. Endress PK. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
15. Endress PK. 1995. Major traits of monocot flowers. In : Rudall PJ, Cribb PJ, Cutler DF, Humphries CJ, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Kew : Royal Botanic Gardens, 43 79.
16. Endress PK, Igersheim A. 2000. Gynoecium structure and evolution in basal angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (Suppl. S211 S223.
17. Fuse S, Tamura MN. 2000. A phylogenetic analysis of the plastid matK gene with emphasis on Melanthiaceae sensu lato. Plant Biology 2 : 415 427.
18. Greller AM, Matzke EB. 1970. Organogenesis, aestivation, and anthesis in the flower of Lilium tigrinum. Botanical Gazette 131 : 304 311.
19. Hartl D, Severin I. 1981. Verwachsungen in Umfeld des Griffels bei Allium, Cyanastrum und Heliconia und den Monocotylen allgemein. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 55 : 235 260.
20. van Heel WA. 1988. On the development of some gynoecia with septal nectaries. Blumea 33 : 477 504.
21. Igersheim A, Buzgo M, Endress PK. 2001. Gynoecium diversity and systematics in basal monocots. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 136 : 1 65.
22. Kocyan A, Endress PK. 2001. Floral structure and development and systematic aspects of some 'lower' Asparagales. Plant Systematics and Evolution 229 : 187 216.
23. Merckx V, Geuten K, Pyck N, Smets E, Schols P. 2003. Palynology and evolution of Nartheciaceae. In : Bayer C, Dressler S, Schneider J, Zizka G, eds. 16th International Symposium on Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, 17th International Senckenberg Conference, 21-27 September 2003. Abstracts. Frankfurt am Main : Palmarum Hortus Francofurtensis, 198.
24. Ohwi J. 1965. Flora of Japan. Washington, DC : Smithsonian Institution.
25. Remizowa MV, Sokoloff DD, Campbell LM, Stevenson DW, Rudall PJ. 2007. Post-genital carpel fusion does not always co-occur with septal nectaries in monocots: evidence from Isidrogalvia (Tofieldiaceae). In : Systematics: The Sixth Biennial Conference of the Systematics Association, 28-31 August 2007. Abstracts. Edinburgh : Royal Botanic Garden, 70.
26. Remizowa MV, Sokoloff DD, Rudall PJ. 2006a. Patterns of floral structure and orientation in Japonolirion, Narthecium, and Tofieldia. Aliso 22 : 159 171.
27. Remizowa MV, Sokoloff DD, Rudall PJ. 2006b. Evolution of the monocot gynoecium: evidence from comparative morphology and development in Tofieldia, Japonolirion, Petrosavia and Narthecium. Plant Systematics and Evolution 258 : 183 209.
28. Rudall PJ. 2002. Homologies of inferior ovaries and septal nectaries in monocotyledons. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163 : 261 276.
29. Rudall PJ, Bateman RM, Fay MF, Eastman A. 2002. Floral anatomy and systematics of Alliaceae with particular reference to Gilliesia, a presumed insect mimic with strongly zygomorphic flowers. American Journal of Botany 89 : 1867 1883.
30. Rudall PJ, Manning JC, Goldblatt P. 2003. Evolution of floral nectaries in Iridaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 90 : 613 631.
31. Sajo MG, Rudall PJ, Prychid CJ. 2004. Floral anatomy of Bromeliaceae, with particular reference to the evolution of epigyny and septal nectaries in commelinoid monocots. Plant Systematics and Evolution 247 : 215 231.
32. Schmid R. 1985. Functional interpretations of the morphology and anatomy of septal nectaries. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 34 : 125 128.
33. Simpson MG. 1998. Reversal in ovary position from inferior to superior in the Haemodoraceae: evidence from floral ontogeny. International Journal of Plant Sciences 159 : 466 479.
34. Simpson MG, Dickison WC. 1981. Comparative anatomy of Lachnanthes and Lophiola (Haemodoraceae). Flora 171 : 95 113.
35. Smets EF, Ronse Decraene LP, Caris P, Rudall PJ. 2000. Floral nectaries in monocotyledons: distribution and evolution. In : Wilson KL, Morrison DA, eds. Monocots: systematics and evolution. Collingwood, Vic CSIRO Publishing, 230 240.
36. Stauffer FW, Endress PK. 2003. Comparative morphology of female flowers and systematics in Geonomeae (Arecaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 242 : 171 203.
37. Stauffer FW, Rutishauser R, Endress PK. 2002. Morphology and development of the female flowers in Geonoma interrupta (Arecaceae). American Journal of Botany 89 : 220 229.
38. Sterling C. 1979. Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Liliaceae: Tofieldieae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 79 : 321 332.
39. Takhtajan AL. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York : Columbia University Press.
40. Tamura MN. 1998. Nartheciaceae. In : Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol. 3. Berlin : Springer, 381 392.
41. Tamura MN, Yamashita J, Fuse S, Haraguchi M. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of monocotyledons inferred from combined analyses of plastid matK and rbcL gene sequences. Journal of Plant Research 117 : 109 120.
42. Utech FH. 1978. Floral vascular anatomy of the monotypic Japanese Metanarthecium luteoviride Maxim. (Liliaceae-Melanthioideae). Annals of Carnegie Museum of Natural History 47 : 455 477.
43. Zomlefer WB. 1997. The genera of Nartheciaceae in the south-eastern United States. Harvard Papers in Botany 2 : 195 211.