The value of parsing as feature generation for gene mention recognition

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 895-904

  Smith, Larry H ^a   Wilbur, W John ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological text; Gene mention recognition; Machine learning; Named entity recognition; Natural language processing; Parsers; Support vector machines

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL TEXT; MACHINE LEARNING; NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PARSERS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; ROBOT LEARNING; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

CHARACTER RECOGNITION;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA SYNTHESIS; GENE; GOLD STANDARD; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MACHINE LEARNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; GENES; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 70349456966     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Fukuda K, Tsunoda T, Tamura A, Takagi T. Toward information extraction: identifying protein names from biological papers. Proceedings of the Pacific symposium on biocomputing (PSB'98); 1998. p. 705-16.
2. Tanabe L., and Wilbur W.J. Tagging gene and protein names in biomedical text. Bioinformatics 18 8 (2002) 1124-1132
3. Yeh A., Morgan A., Colosimo M., and Hirschman L. BioCreAtIvE Task 1A: gene mention finding evaluation. BMC Bioinform 6 Suppl. 1 (2005) S2
4. Wilbur WJ, Smith L, Tanabe L. BioCreative 2. Gene mention task. The second BioCreative challenge evaluation workshop. Madrid, Spain; 2007. p. 7-16.
5. Collins M, Singer Y. Unsupervised models for named entity classification. 1999 Joint SIGDAT conference on EMNLP and VLC; 1999.
6. Miller S, Fox H, Ramshaw L, Weischedel R. A novel use of statistical parsing to extract information from text. Sixth applied natural language processing conference; 2000.
7. Ray S, Craven M. Representing sentence structure in hidden markov models for information extraction. 17th International joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI-2001); 2001.
8. Vlachos A. Tackling the BioCreative 2 Gene mention task with conditional random fields and syntactic parsing. Second BioCreative challenge evaluation workshop. Madrid, Spain; 2006. p. 85-8.
9. Finkel J, Dingare S, Nguyen H, Nissim M, Manning C, Sinclair G. Exploiting context for biomedical entity recognition: from syntax to the web. JNLPBA; 2004.
10. Erkan G, Ozgur A, Radev D. Semi-supervised classification for extracting protein interaction sentences using dependency parsing. EMNLP; 2007.
11. Sagae K, Miyao T, Matsuzaki T, Tsujii J. Challenges in mapping of syntactic representations for framework-independent parser evaluation. Workshop on automated syntactic annotations for interoperable language resources; 2008.
12. Saetre R, Sagae K, Tsujii J. Syntactic features for protein-protein interaction extraction. LBM; 2007.
13. Miyao Y, Saetre R, Sagae K, Matsuzaki T, Tsujii J. Task-oriented evaluation of syntactic parsers and their representations. ACL-08: HLT; Columbus, OH: Association for computational linguistics; 2008.
14. Carroll J, Minnen G, Briscoe E. Corpus annotation for parser evaluation. EACL-99 Post-conference workshop on linguistically interpreted corpora. Bergen, Norway; 1999.
15. Carroll J, Briscoe T, Sanfilippo A. Parser evaluation: a survey and new proposal. The first international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC). Granada, Spain; 1998.
16. Miyao Y, Sagae K, Tsujii J. Towards framework-independent evaluation of deep linguistic parsers. Grammar engineering across frameworks. Stanford University; 2007.
17. Clegg AB, Shepherd AJ. Benchmarking natural-language parsers for biological applications using dependency graphs. BMC Bioinform 2007:17.
18. Katrenko S, Adriaans P. Learning relations from biomedical corpora using dependency trees. KDECB; 2006.
19. Miyao Y, Tsujii J. Probabilistic disambiguation models for wide-coverage HPSG parsing. 43rd Annual meeting on association for computational linguistics. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2005.
20. de Marneffe M-C, MacCartney B, Manning CD. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. Proceedings of fifth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC2006). Genoa, Italy; 2006.
21. Smith L., Rindflesch T., and Wilbur W. MedPost: a part of speech tagger for biomedical text. Bioinformatics 20 14 (2004) 2
22. Lease M, Charniak E. Parsing biomedical literature. Second international joint conference on natural language processing (IJCNLP'05); Korea: Springer; 2005.
23. Evans DA, Lefferts RG, Grefenstette G, Handerson SK, Hersh WR, Archbold AA. CLARIT TREC design, experiments, and results. The first text retrieval conference (TREC-1) 1992. National institute of standards and technology. NIST Special Publication; 1992. p.500-207:251-86.
24. Burges CJC. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Available electronically from the author: Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies;1999.
25. Joachims T. Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. Dortmund, Germany: Universitat Dortmund1997 November 27, 1997. Report No.: LS-8 Report 23.
26. Joachims T. Training linear SVMs in linear time. Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. Philadelphia, PA, USA: ACM; 2006.
27. Schapire R.E., and Singer Y. Improved boosting algorithms using confidence-rated predictions. Machine Learn 37 3 (1999) 297-336
28. Berger A.L., Pietra S.A.D., and Pietra V.J.D. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Comput Linguistics 22 1 (1996) 39-71
29. Zhang T. Solving large scale linear prediction problems using stochastic gradient descent algorithms. Twenty-first international conference on machine learning. Banff, Alberta, Canada; 2004.
30. Langley P, Sage S. Induction of selective Bayesian classifiers. Tenth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Seattle, WA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1994. p. 399-406.
31. Langley P, Iba W, Thompson K. An analysis of Bayesian classifiers. Tenth national conference on artificial intelligence. San Jose: AAAI Press; 1992. p. 223-8.
32. Wilbur WJ. Boosting naive bayesian learning on a large subset of MEDLINE. American medical informatics 2000 annual symposium. Los Angeles, CA: American Medical Informatics Association: 2000. p. 918-22.
33. Dietterich T. Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Comput 10 7 (1998) 29
34. Hand D.G., and Till R.J. A simple generalisation of the area under the roc curve for multiple class classification problems. Machine Learn 45 2 (2001) 16
35. Zhang T., and Oles F.J. Text categorization based on regularized linear classification methods. Info Retrieval 4 1 (2001) 5-31
36. Joachims T. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In: Scholkopf B., Burges C., and Smola A. (Eds). Advances in Kernel methods - support vector learning (1999), MIT-Press
37. Charniak E. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. The first conference on North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 2000. p. 132-9.
38. Bikel DM. Design of a multi-lingual, parallel-processing statistical parsing engine. human language technology conference 2002 (HLT2002). San Diego, CA; 2002.
39. Briscoe E, Carroll J, Watson R. The second release of the rasp system. COLING/ACL 2006 interactive presentation sessions; 2006.
40. Lin D. Principle Based parsing without overgeneration. 31st annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics. Columbus, Ohio; 1993.
41. Klein D, Manning C. Fast exact inference with a factored model for natural language processing. Advances in neural information processing systems; 2002. p. 15.
42. Klein D, Manning C. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. 41st meeting of the association for computational linguistics (ACL'03). Sapporo, Japan; 2003.