Main methods for setting ecological compensation standard and their application

Shengtai Xuebao/ Acta Ecologica Sinica

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 4431-4440

  Li, Xiao Guang ^a   Miao, Hong ^a   Zheng, Hua ^a   Ouyang, Zhi Yun ^a  

^a RESEARCH CENTER FOR ECO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Ecological compensation; Ecosystem services; Market; Standard

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEM APPROACH; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LITERATURE REVIEW; STANDARD (REFERENCE); THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 70349446420     PISSN: 10000933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Thomas L Dobbs, Jules Pretty. Case study of agri-environmental payments: The United Kingdom. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65 (4):765775.
2. Stephanie Aviron, et al. Effects of agri-environmental measures, site and landscape conditions on butterfly diversity of Swiss grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2007, 122(3) : 295-304.
3. Herzog F, Dreier S. Effect of ecological compensation areas on floristic and beading bird diversity in Swiss agricultural landscapes. Agricultural, Ecosystems and Environment, 2003,108 :189-204.
4. Christina v Haaren, Manfred Bathke. Integrated landscape planning and remuneration of agri-enviromental services; Results of a case study in the Fuhrberg region of Germany. Journal of Environmental Management, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 20 August, 2007.
5. Costanza R, et al. The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature, 1997,(386) : 253-260.
6. Partha Dasgupta. Nature and economy. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 44:475-487.
7. Whitehead J C, Blomquist C C. Measuring Contingent Values for Wetlands: Effects of information about Related Environmental Goods. Water Resources Research, 1991, 2523-2531.
8. Robles D, Kangas, Lassioe J P, et al. Evaluation of Potential Gross Income from Non-timber Products in a Riparian Forest for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Agroforestry Systems, 1997, 44(2-3) :215-225.
9. Chee Y E. An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biological Conservation, 2004, 120(4) :549-565.
10. Olschewski R, Benftez P. Secondary forests as temporary carbon sinks? The economic impact of accounting methods on reforestation projects in the tropics. Ecological Economics, 2005, 55(3) : 380-394.
11. Olschewski R, Benftez P, de Koning G H J, Schlichter T. How attractive are forest carbon sinks? Economic insights into supply and demand of certified emission reductions. Journal of Forest Economics, 2005, 11(2) :77-94.
12. QinYH, Kang M Y. A review of ecological compensation and its improvement measures. Journal of Natural Resources, 2007, 22 (4) :557-567.
13. Li Y D, Chen B F. The Values for Ecological Service Function of Tropical Natural Forest in Hainan Island, China. Forest Research,2003, 16(2) : 146-152.
14. Brian Roach, William W Wade. Policy evaluation of natural resource injuries using habitat equivalency analysis. Ecological Economics, 2006, 58 (2):421-437.
15. Richard W Dunford, Thomas C. Ginn, William H. Desvousges. The use of habitat equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessments. Ecological Economics, 2004, 48(1) : 49-70.
16. Landell-Mills N, Porras I T. Silver Bullet or Fools' Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and Their Impacts on the Poor. International Institute for Environment and Development IIED), 2001.
17. Zetterberg L, Nilsson K, Ahman M, et al. Analysis of national allocation plans for the EU ETS. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, 2004.
18. Tsen, W. et al. Payments for Environmental Services in Mexico. Berkeley, University of California at Berkeley-Goldman School of Public Policy. 2002, 26.
19. Bishop J. Pro-poor Markets for Environmental Services; A New Source of Finance for Sustainable Development? Presentation made at the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, 2002, August 28.
20. Stefano Pagiola, Joshua Bishop, and Natasha Landell-Mills. Selling forest environmental services. London; Earthscan Publications, 2002.
21. Liu G X, et al. Analysis of watershed ecological compensation. Jiangxi Chemical Industry, 2006, (4) : 175-176.
22. Rosa H, et al. Compensation for Environmental Services and Rural Communities. Lessons from the Americas and Key Issues for Strengthening Community Strategies. PRISMA. 2003: 27.
23. Pagiola S, et al. Making market-based mechanisms. Work for Forests and People, 2002: 264.
24. Polanyi K. The Great Transformation; the Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston; Beacon Press, 1944.
25. Bromley D W. Rethinking markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1997, 79 (5) : 1383-1393.
26. Daily, Gretchen C. Introduction; what are ecosystem services? In; Nature's Services. Washington,D. C. : Island Press, 1997.
27. Boyd J, King D, Wainger L. Compensation for lost ecosystem services: the need for benefits-based transfer ratios and restoration criteria. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 2001, 20 (2) : 393-412.
28. Troy A, Wilson M A. Mapping ecosystem services; practical challenges and opportunities in linking CIS and value transfer. Ecological Economics, 2006, 60(2) :435-449.
29. Timm Kroeger, Frank Casey. An assessment of marketed based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands. Ecological Economics, 2007, 64(2) : 321-332.
30. Cregory Mankiw N. Principles of Economics. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2003. 6-7.
31. Sven Wunder, Montserrat Albän. Decentralized payments for environmental services; The cases of Pimampiro and FROFAFOR in Ecuador. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4) :685-698.
32. Ada Wossink, Scott M. Swinton. Jointness in production and farmers' willing to supply non-marketed ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 2007, 64(2) :297-304.
33. Tobias Wtlnscher, Stefanie Engel, Sven Wunder. Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services; A tool for boosting conservation benefits. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4) :822-833.
34. Macmillan Douglas C, Harley David, Morrison Ruth. Cost-effectiveness analysis of woodland ecosystem restoration. Ecological Economics, 1998, 27(3) :313-324.
35. Stefano Pagiola, Elias Ramirez, et al. Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua. Ecological Economics, 2007,64(2) :374-385.
36. M. Kalacska, et al. Baseline assessment for environmental services payments from satellite imagery: A case study from Costa Rica and Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 1 May, 2007.
37. Walter Immerzeel, Jetse Stoorrogel, et al. Can payments for ecosystem services secure the water tower of Tibet? Agricultural Systems, 2008, 96 (1-3):52-63.
38. Chen Q, et al. Study of forest compensation. Beijing; China Forestry Press, 2006.115-129.
39. James Boyd, Lisa Wainger. Measuring Ecosystem Service Benefits; The Use of Landscape Analysis of Evaluate Environmental Trades and Compensation. 2003. http://www.rff.org.
40. Ciriacy-Wantrup S V. Capital Returns from Soil Conservation Practices. Journal of Farm Economics, 1947, 29(4) : 1181-1196.
41. Loomis J B, Adamowicz W L, Boxall PC, et al. Measuring General Public Preservation Values for Forest Resources; Evidence from Contingent Valuation Surveys. Forestry, Economics and the Environment, 1996, 91-102.
42. Homles T, Alger K, Zinkhan C, et al. The Effect of Response Time on Conjoint Analysis Estimates of Rainforest Protection Values. Journal of Forest Economics, 1998, 4(1) :7-28.
43. Karin Johst, Martin Drechsler, Frank W tzold. An ecological-economic modelling procedure to design compensation payments for the efficient spatio-temporal allocation of species protection measures. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41 (1) :37-49.
44. Kalpana Ambastha, Syed Ainul Hussain, Ruchi Badola. Social and economic consideration in conserving wetlands of indo-gangetic plains; A case study of Kabartal wetland, India. Environmentalist, 2007, 27 (2) :261-273. (Pubitemid 46955846)
45. Azar Christian, Holmberg John. Defining the generational environmental debt. Ecological Economics, 1995, 14(1):7-19.
46. Koning G H J, et al. Modelling the impacts of payments for biodiversity conservation on regional land-use patterns. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007,83(4) :255-267.
47. Rodrigo Sierra, Eric Russman. On the efficiency of environmental service payments: A forest conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Pica. Ecological Economics, 2006, 59(1) : 131-141.
48. Ada Wossink, Scott M. Swinton. Jointness in production and fanners' willingness to supply non-marketed ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 2007, 64(2) :297-304.
49. Ruud Cuperus, et al. Guidelines for ecological compensation associated with highways. Biological Conservation, 1999, 90(1) :41-51.
50. Brian C, Robert C. Abt. Estimating price compensation requirements for eco-certified forestry. Ecological Economics, 2001, 36(1) :149-163.
51. chele H K, Dabbert S. An economic approach for a better understanding of conflicts between fanners and nature conservationists- an application of the decision support system MOD AM to the Lower Odra Valley National Park. Agricultural Systems, 2002, 74(2) :241-255.
52. Mayrand K, Paguin M. Payments for environment services; A survey and assessment of current schemes. Nobtreal; For the commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America, 2004.
53. Task force on Eco-Compensation mechanisms and policies. Eco-compensation mechanisms and policies in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2007.
54. Beatrice Sch pbach, Kurt Zgraggen, Erich Szerencsits. Incentives for low-input land-use types and their influence on the attractiveness of landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 22 August 2007.
55. Dominik Roser, Karri Pasanen, Antti Asikainen. Decision support program "Ener Tree" for analyzing forest residue recovery options. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2006, 30(4) :326-333.