Integrated landscape planning and remuneration of agri-environmental services. Results of a case study in the Fuhrberg region of Germany

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 209-221

  v Haaren, Christina ^a   Bathke, Manfred ^b  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^b Entera   (Germany)

Author keywords

Agri environmental services; Compensation payments; Landscape planning; New remuneration models

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS; EFFICIENCY; FARMS;

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE; CASE-STUDIES; COMPENSATION PAYMENTS; COST-EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL GOODS; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; FARMING PRACTICES; GOOD AND SERVICES; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; NEW REMUNERATION MODEL;

MOTIVATION;

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; MODELING; PUBLIC SPENDING; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

AGRICULTURAL WORKER; AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; BUDGET; COMPENSATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; EUROPEAN UNION; GERMANY; HUMAN; LANDSCAPE; METHODOLOGY; MONEY; UNITED STATES;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FUHRBERG; GERMANY; HANNOVER; LOWER SAXONY;

EID: 51149089952     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.058     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Antipov A.N. Landscape Planning-Tools and Experience in Implementation (2006), Russian Academy of Science, Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, F.R. Germany, Bonn, Irkusk
2. Bastian, O., Schreiber, K.-F., 1994. Analyse und ökologische Bewertung der Landschaft, Jena.
3. Bathke, M., Brahms, E., Brenken, H., v. Haaren, C., Hachmann, R., Meiforth, J., 2003. Integriertes Gebietsmanagement-Neue Wege für Naturschutz, Grundwasserschutz und Landwirtschaft am Beispiel der Wassergewinnungsregion Hannover-Nord. In: Institut für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz Universitaet Hannover (Eds.), Integriertes Gebietsmanagement.
4. Bielig A. Oekonomische Analyse des Vertragsnaturschutzes-Rahmenbedingungen (2003), Funktionsweise und Implikationen, Hamburg
5. Boettcher J., Strebel O., and Koelle W. Redox conditions and microbial sulfur reactions in the Fuhrberger Feld sandy aquifer. In: Matthess G., Frimmel F.H., Hirsch P., Schulz H.D., and Usdowski E. (Eds). Progress in Hydrogeochemistry (1992), Berlin, Heidelberg 219-226
6. Braband, D., van Elsen, T., Oppermann, R., Haack, S., 2003. Ökologisch bewirtschaftete Ackerflächen-eine ökologische Leistung?-Ein ergebnisorientierter Ansatz für die Praxis. In: Freyer, B. (Eds.), Beiträge zur 7. Wissenschaftstagung zum Ökologischen Landbau-Ökologischer Landbau der Zukunft, Wien, pp. 153-156. 〈http://www.wiz.uni-kassel.de/foel/WissTagg_DB.pdf (27/09/2006)〉.
7. Brahms, M., v. Haaren, C., Janssen, U., 1989. Ansatz zur Ermittlung der Schutzwuerdigkeit der Boeden im Hinblick auf das Biotopentwicklungspotential. In: Landschaft+Stadt 21, Heft 3, Stuttgart, pp. 110-114.
8. Braun-Blanquet, J., 1964. Pflanzensoziologie-Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, third ed., Wien.
9. Bronner G., Oppermann R., and Rösler S. Umweltleistungen als Grundlage der landwirtschaftlichen Förderung. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 29 12 (1997) 357-368
10. Council of Europe, 2000. The European Landscape Convention. 〈http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ChercheSig.asp?NT=176 &CM=8&DF=&CL=EN (07/01/23)〉.
11. Council of the European Union. Financial Perspective 2007-2013 15915/05 (2005)
12. Cullingworth B., and Nadin V. Town and Country Planning in the UK. 14th ed (2006), London, New York p. 270
13. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), Environment Agency, undated. Review of Inpacts of Rural Land Use and Management on Flood Generation. Flood and Coastal Defence R&D Programm R&D Technical Report, FD2114.
14. Di Fabio U. Rechtliche Instrumente zum Schutz von Boden, Wasser und Luft vor landwirtschaftlichen Umweltbelastungen. Natur und Recht 3 (1995) 123-129
15. European Commission DG Agriculture and Rural Development, 2005. Agri-environment measures-overview on general principles, Types of measures and application. Uni G-4.
16. European Environmental Agency (EEA), 2006. Assesing environmental integration in EU Agriculture pOlicy, EEA Breifing 06-01. 〈http://reports.eea.europa.eu/briefing_2006_1/en/briefing_01_2006-E N.pdf#search=%22European%20Environmental%20Agency%2C%202006%2C%20Assesin g%20environmental%20integration%20in%20EU%20agriculture%20policy%22 (29/09/2006)〉.
17. Gay, S.H., Osterburg, B., Schmidt, T., 2004. Szenarien der Agrarpolitik-Untersuchung moeglicher agrarstruktureller oekonomischer Effekte unter Beruecksichtigung umweltpolitischer Zielsetzungen.In: Der Rat von Sachverstaendigen fuer Umweltfragen (SRU) (Eds.), No. 37, Berlin. 〈http://www.umweltrat.de (29/09/2006)〉.
18. Gay, S.H., Osterburg, B., Baldock, D., Zdanowicz, A., 2005. Recent evolution of the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP): state of play and environmental potential, MEACAP WP6 D4b, Federal Agricultural Research Centre, Braunschweig and Institute for European Environmental Policy, London. 〈http://www.fcrn.org.uk/pdf/cap_report.pdf#search=%22Gay%2C%20S.H.% 2C%20Osterburg%2C%20B.%2C%20Baldock%2C%20D.%2C%20Zdanowicz%2C%20A.%2C%20 2004.%20Recent%20ecolution%20of%20the%20EU%20Common%20Agricultural%20Pol icy%20(CAP)%3A%20state%20of%20play%20and%20environmental%20potential%2C% 20MEACAP%20%E2%80%93%20WP6%20D4b%20Common%20Agricultural%20Policy%20%E2% 80%93%20march%202005.%20%22 (29/09/2006)〉.
19. Glebe, T., 2005. EU Agri-Environmental Payments: Appropriate Policy or Protectionism in Disguise? Paper WP2005-27, Institute of Governmental Studies. 〈http://repositories.cdlib.org/igs/WP2005-27/ (29/09/2006)〉.
20. Goodland R., and Daly H. Universal Environmental Sustainabilty and the Principle of Integrity. In: Westra L., and Lemons J. (Eds). Perspectives on Ecological Integrity (1995), Kluwer, Dordrecht 102-124
21. Grajewski, R., Reiter, K., Preising, A., Pufahl, A., Roggendorf, W., Horlitz, T., Sander, A., 2003. Halbzeitbewertung von Proland Niedersachsen, Kap.6 Agrarumweltmaßnahmen. Studie im Auftrag des Niedersächsischen Ministeriums für laendlichen Raum, Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz Hannover.
22. v. Haaren, C. (Eds.), 2004. Landschaftsplanung, Ulmer Verlag UTB Schriften 2004, Stuttgart.
23. v. Haaren C. Landscape Planning facing the challenge of the Development of cultural Landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 60 (2002) 73-80
24. v. Haaren C., and Warren-Kretzschmar B. The interactive landscape plan-Use and benefits of new technologies in landscape planning, including initial results of the interactive Landscape plan Koenigslutter am Elm, Germany. Landscape Research 31 1 (2006) 83-105
25. v. Haaren, C., Kügelgen, B., Warren-Kretzschmar, B., (Eds.), 2000. Landscape Planning in Europe. Report of the international Conference "Landsape Planning in Europe" 9/99, MU Niedersachsen, Hanover.
26. Hanrahan, C., Zinn, J., 2005. Green payments in US and European Union Agricultural Policy, RS (Congresional Research Service) Report for Congress November 2005, Order Code RL32624.
27. Heumann S., Koenecke J., Boettcher J., and Springob G. Parameterizing net N mineralization from, old humus' in sandy arable soils of a drinking-water catchment (Fuhrberger Feld). In: Horst W.J., et al. (Ed). Plant Nutrition-Food Security and Sustainability of Agro-ecosystems (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 922-923
28. IEEP, DLG (Service for Land and Water Management with the Dutch National Reference Centre for Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality), 2004. Land abandonment and biodiversity, in relation to the 1st and 2nd pillars of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy; outcome of an international seminar in Sigulda, lativia, 7-8 October 2004. 〈http://www.ieep.org.uk (28/09/2006)〉.
29. IEEP, FAL, IREAS, UPM, clm, KVL, 2004. Background paper for 'Policy Forum on cross-compliance in the CAP'. 〈http://www.ieep.org.uk/publications/pdfs/crosscompliance/seminar6b ackground%20paper.pdf (29/09/2006)〉.
30. INK, 2002. Progress Report, Fifth International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea. 〈http://www.dep.no/md/nsc (28/09/2006)〉.
31. Institute of European Environmental Policy (IEEP), 2004. The Future of EU environment policy: challenges opportunities, the all party Parliamentary Environment Group London, Portsmouth. 〈http://212.18.47.244/web_a/portal_a.nsf/ae76a4ee10890d4bc1256fb900 5f74fe/c16b33955825c25ec1256fe80037408b/$FILE/0412-IEEP-future%20 EU%20environmental%20policy.pdf#search=%22IEEP%20(Institute%20European%2 0Environmental%20Policy)%2C%202004.%20The%20Future%20of%20EU%20environme nt%20policy%3A%20challenges%20%20opportunities.-%20the%20all%20party%20P arliamentary%20Environment%20Group%20London%2C%20Portsmouth.%22 (29/09/2006)〉.
32. Jessel B., and Tobias K. Ökologisch orientierte Planung-Eine Einführung in Theorien (2002), Daten und Methoden, Stuttgart
33. Kiemstedt, H., v. Haaren, C., Mönnecke, M., Ott, S., 1998. Landscape Planning-Contents and Procedures. The Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Bonn, Germany.
34. Kleijn D., Berendse F., Smit R., and Gilissen N. Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature 413 (2001) 723-725. http://www.stat.ucla.edu/~dinov/courses_students.dir/STAT10_Fall01/STAT1 0_Fall01/NaturePaperSamplingProtocol.pdf 〈http://www.stat.ucla.edu/~dinov/courses_students.dir/STAT10_Fall01 /STAT10_Fall01/NaturePaperSamplingProtocol.pdf (29/09/2006)〉
35. Kleijn D., Baquero R.A., Clough Y., Díaz M., Esteban J., Fernández F., Gabriel D., Herzog F., Holzschuh A., Jöhl R., Knop E., Kruess A., Marshall E.J.P., Steffan-Dewenter I., Tscharntke T., Verhulst J., West T.M., and Yela J.L. Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecology Letters 9 (2006) 243-254
36. Kloepper, R., 2006. Analysis of the factors which contribute to or hamper nature conservation advice to farmers in England: A case study of the Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group (FWAG). Diploma Thesis, Department of Environmental Planning, Leibniz University of Hannover.
37. Knauer N. Honorierung ökologischer Leistungen nach marktwirtschaftlichen Prinzipien. Zeitschrift für Kulturtechnik und Landentwicklung 33 (1992) 65-76
38. Lääne, A., Pitkänen, H., Arheimer, B., Behrendt, H., Jarosinski, W., Lucane, S., Pachel, K., Räike, A., Shekhovtsov, A., Svendsen, L.M., Valatka, S., 2002. Evaluation of the implementation of the 1988 Ministerial Declaration regarding nutrient load reductions in the Baltic Sea catchment area. In: The Finnish Environment 524, p. 195. 〈http://www.ymparisto.fi (29/09/2006)〉.
39. Ministerium für Ernährung und Ländlichen Raum Baden-Württemberg, 1999. Richtlinie des Ministeriums Ländlicher Raum zur Förderung der Erhaltung und Pflege der Kulturlandschaft und von Erzeugungspraktiken, die der Marktentlastung dienen (Marktentlastungs- und Kulturlandschaftsausgleich - MEKA II - vom 12.09.2000, Az. 65-8872.53. 〈http://www.landwirtschaft-mlr.baden-wuerttemberg.de/servlet/PB/sho w/1062188/richtlinien.pdf#search=%22MEKA%20II%2C%201999%22 (29/09/2006)〉.
40. Niedersaechsisches Landesamt fuer Oekologie (NLÖ). Wirkungskontrollen der PROLAND-Naturschutzmaßnahmen (2003), Zwischenbewertung, Hannover
41. OECD, 2005. Evaluating Agri-Environmental Policies: Design, Practice and Results. 〈http://www.sourceoecd.org/agriculture/9264010106〉 〈http://www.sourceoecd.org/environment/9264010106〉.
42. Öko-Qualitätsverordnung-Schweizerischer Bundesrat, 2001. Verordnung über die regionale Förderung der Qualität und der Vernetzung von ökologischen Ausgleichsflächen in der Landwirtschaft, Bern.
43. Osterburg, B., 2002. Analyse der Bedeutung von naturschutzorientierten Maßnahmen in der Landwirtschaft im Rahmen der Verordnung (EG) 1257/1999. SRU (Ed.) Metzler-Poeschel, Stuttgart. 〈www.umweltrat.de〉.
44. Piorr, A., Matzdorf, B., 2004. The assessment of environmental effectiveness of agri-environmental measures regarding intensity impacts and spatial equivalence. In: Assessing rural development policies of the CAP: 87th EAAE-Seminar, 21-23 April 2004, Vienna.
45. Plankl, R., 1999. Honorierung ökologischer Leistungen-Erfahrungen mit dem US-amerikanischen "Conservation Reserve program" (CRP). In: Mehl, P., (Eds.), Agrarstruktur und ländliche Räume: Rückblick und Ausblick, Landbauforschung Völkenrode, Sonderheft 201, FAL (Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft).
46. Richter gen. Kemmermann, A., 2001. Neue Honorierungsmodelle für Umweltleistungen der Landwirtschaft. Diploma Thesis, Institute for Nature Conservation and Landscape Planning Universtiy of Hannover.
47. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP), 2002. Twenty-third Report 〈Environmental Planning〉, presented to Parliament by Command of Her Majesty, 2002.
48. Scholles F., and v. Haaren C. Co-ordination of SEA and Landscape Planning. In: Schmidt M., Joao E., and Albrecht E. (Eds). Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment (Environmental Protection in the EU) vol. 2 (2004), Springer, Berlin 557-570
49. Simoncini, R., 2004. Definition of a common European analytical framework for the development of local agri-environmental programmes for biodiversity and landscape conservation (AEMBAC). Final Report 5th Framework Contract Ref.: QLRT-1999-31666. 〈http://www.nandoperettifound.org/documents/AEMBAC%20Project%20Fina l%20report_29.pdf〉.
50. Steinitz C. Framework for Theories applicable to the Education of Landscape Architects (and other Environmental Design Professionals). Landscape Journal 9 2 (1990) 136-143
51. The German Advisory Council on the Environment (GACE), 2002. Towards Strengthening and Reorienting Nature and Landscape Conservation, Special Report, English summary and conclusions. 〈http://www.umweltrat.de (27/09/2006)〉.
52. The German Advisory Council on the Environment (GACE), 2004a. Environmental Report 2004-Ensuring Environmental Capacity, English summary, Berlin. 〈www.umweltrat.de (27/09/2006)〉.
53. The German Advisory Council on the Environment (GACE), 2004b. Meeresumweltschutz für Nord- und Ostsee-Sondergutachten.-Nomos.-English abstract. 〈www.umwelrat.de (27/09/2006)〉.
54. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Farm Service Agency, 1997. The New Conservation Reserve Program.
55. WTO, 2002. Domestic support in agriculture, The boxes. 〈http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/agric_e/agboxes_e.pdf (29/09/2006)〉.