Innovative teaching to promote innovative thinking: How education technology can help

Education for Innovation: Implications for India, China and America

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 181-210

  Perkins, Katherine K ^a   Wieman, Carl E ^b  

^a University of Colorado's Science Education Initiative   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349437781     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Adams, W. K., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N. D., & Wieman, C. E. (2006). A new instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. Physics review of special topics, physics education research, 2, 010101; Retrieved July 26, 2007, from http://prst-per.aps.org/pdf/PRSTPER/v2/i1/e010101
2. Adams, W. K., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2007a). A study of educational simulations, part I - engagement and learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research. (in press). Pre-print retrieved June 3, 2007, from http://www.colorado.edu/physics/EducationIssues/research/papers_talks.htm
3. Adams, W. K., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2007b). A Study of Educational Simulations, Part II - Interface Design. Journal of Interactive Learning Research. (in press). Pre-print retrieved June 3, 2007, from: http://www.colorado.edu/physics/EducationIssues/research/papers_talks.htm
4. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Bransford, J., & Donovan, M. (Eds.). (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. Beatty, I. D., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., & Dufresne, R. J. (2006). Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74(1), 31-39.
7. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
8. Clark, C., & Mayer, R. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
9. Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977.
10. DeHaan, R. L. (2005). The impending revolution in undergraduate science education. Journal of Science Education. and Technology, 14(2), 253-269.
11. deJong, T. (2006). Computer simulations: Technology advances in inquiry learning. Science, 312, 532-533.
12. Duit, R. (2006). Bibliography - STCSE (students' and teachers' conceptions and science education). Retrieved June 3, 2007, from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html
13. Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Dweck, C. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
15. Ericsson, K. A. (2002). Attaining excellence through deliberate practice: Insights from the study of expert performance. In M. Ferrari (Ed.), The pursuit of excellence in education (pp. 21-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C., Kohl, P., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N., et al. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physics review of special topics, physics education research, 1, 010103; Retrieved July 26, 2007, from http://prst-per.aps.org/pdf/PRSTPER/v1/i1/e010103
17. Finkelstein, N. D., & Pollock, S. J. (2005). Replicating and understanding successful innovations: Implementing tutorials in introductory physics. Physics review of special topics, physics education research, 1, 010101.
18. Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64-74.
19. Hake, R. (2006). The physics education reform effort: A possible model for higher education? The national teaching and earning forum, 15(1). Retrieved June 3, 2007, from http://www.ntlf.com/html/ti/physics.htm
20. Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in Introductory Physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 151-183.
21. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., et al. (2004). Scientific Teaching. Science, 304, 521-522.
22. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141-158.
23. iClicker (2007). http://www.iclicker.com/
24. Jackson, M. H., & Trees, A. R. (2003). Clicker Implementation and Assessment. Boulder: University of Colorado, Information and Technology Services and Faculty Teaching Excellence Program.
25. Linn, M., Lee, H.-S., Tinker, R., Husic, F., & Chiu, J. (2006). Teaching and assessing knowledge integration in science. Science, 313, 1049.
26. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27. McDermott, L. C., & Redish, E. F. (1999). Resource letter on Physics Education Research. American Journal of Physics, 67(9), 755.
28. McDermott, L.C., & the Physics Education Research Group at the University of Washington. (1996). Physics by inquiry. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
29. McDermott, L.C., Shaffer, P.S., & the University of Washington, Physics Education Research Group. (2002). Tutorials in introductory physics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30. McKagan, S. B., Handley, W., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (in review). A research-based curriculum for teaching the photoelectric effect. American Journal of Physics.
31. Mestre, J. (Ed.). (2005). Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
32. Novak, G., Gavrin, A., Christian, W., & Patterson, E. (1999). Just-in-time teaching: Blending active learning with Web technology. San Francisco: Pearson Benjamin Cummings.
33. Oliver-Hoyo, M., & Beichner, R. (2004). The SCALE-UP Project. In V. S. Lee (Ed.), Teaching and learning through inquiry: A guidebook for institutions and instructors. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
34. Perkins, K. K., Adams, W. K., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., & Wieman, C. E. (2005). Correlating Student Views with Student Learning Using the Colorado Learning about Science Survey. (2004) Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings. Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics Press.
35. Perkins, K. K., Gratny, M. M., Adams, W. K., Finkelstein, N. D., & Wieman, C. E. (2006a). Towards characterizing the relationship between students' self-reported interest in and their surveyed views about physics. 2005 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings. Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics Press.
36. Perkins, K. K., Adams, W., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N., Reid, S., Wieman, C., et al. (2006b). PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics. The Physics Teacher, 44, 18.
37. Perkins, K. K., Barbera, J., Adams, W. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2007). Chemistry versus Physics: A comparison of how Biology majors view each discipline. 2006 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings. Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics Press.
38. Pollock, S. (unpublished). Fighting the fade: Student engagement in large peer-instruction classes. Retrieved June 3, 2007, from the Physics Department at the University of Colorado Web site http://www.colorado.edu/physics/EducationIssues/pollock/NSTA_03_post_submission.doc
39. Redish, E. F. (2003). Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
40. Redish, E. F., McCaskey, T., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Lising, L. (2003). Epistemological gains in a large lecture class. Presented at the 127th National Meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Madison, WI.
41. Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M., & Steinberg, R. N. (1998). Student expectations in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 66, 212-224.
42. Ross, P. E. (2006). The expert mind. Scientific American, 295(2).
43. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
44. Steinberg, R. N., Oberem, G. E., & McDermott, L. C. (1996). Development of a computer-based tutorial on the photoelectric effect. American Journal of Physics, 64, 1370.
45. Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation. American Journal of Physics, 66(4), 228-351.
46. Waks, S.,& Sabag, N. (2004). Technology project learning versus lab experimentation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3), 333-342.
47. Wieman, C., & Perkins, K. (2005). Transforming Physics education. Physics Today, 58(11), 36.