The duluth lexical sample systems in SENSEVAL-3

Proceedings of the SENSEVAL@ACL 2004: 3rd International Workshop on the Evaluation of Systems for the Semantic Analysis of Text - Held in cooperation with ACL 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 203-208

  Pedersen, Ted ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEEP LEARNING; SEMANTICS;

CATALANS; LEXICAL FEATURES; MEASURES OF SEMANTIC RELATEDNESS; ROMANIANS; SAMPLE SYSTEM; SUPERVISED LEARNING SYSTEMS; SYSTEM USE; TARGET WORDS; UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH;

DECISION TREES;

EID: 70349424752     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. S. Banerjee and T. Pedersen. 2003a. The design, implementation, and use of the Ngram Statistics Package. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, pages 370–381, Mexico City, February.
2. S. Banerjee and T. Pedersen. 2003b. Extended gloss overlaps as a measure of semantic relatedness. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 805–810, Acapulco, August.
3. E. Black. 1988. An experiment in computational discrimination of English word senses. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 32(2):185–194.
4. L. Breiman. 1996. The heuristics of instability in model selection. Annals of Statistics, 24:2350–2383.
5. S. Mohammad and T. Pedersen. 2004a. Combining lexical and syntactic features for supervised word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 25–32, Boston, MA.
6. S. Mohammad and T. Pedersen. 2004b. Complementarity of lexical and simple syntactic features: The Syntalex approach to SENSEVAL-3. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on the Evaluation of Systems for the Semantic Analysis of Text, Barcelona, Spain.
7. R. Mooney. 1996. Comparative experiments on disambiguating word senses: An illustration of the role of bias in machine learning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 82–91, May.
8. S. Patwardhan, S. Banerjee, and T. Pedersen. 2003. Using measures of semantic relatedness for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, pages 241–257, Mexico City, February.
9. T. Pedersen and R. Bruce. 1997. A new supervised learning algorithm for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 604–609, Providence, RI, July.
10. T. Pedersen. 2000. A simple approach to building ensembles of Naive Bayesian classifiers for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 63–69, Seattle, WA, May.
11. T. Pedersen. 2001a. A decision tree of bigrams is an accurate predictor of word sense. In Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 79–86, Pittsburgh, July.
12. T. Pedersen. 2001b. Machine learning with lexical features: The Duluth approach to senseval-2. In Proceedings of the Senseval-2 Workshop, pages 139–142, Toulouse, July.
13. J. Quinlan. 1986. Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1:81–106.
14. I. Witten and E. Frank. 2000. Data Mining - Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations. Morgan–Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.