A simple approach to building ensembles of naive Bayesian classifiers for word sense disambiguation

1st Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, NAACL 2000 - co-located with 6th Applied Natural Language Processing Conference, ANLP 2000 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 63-69

  Pedersen, Ted ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

CORPUS-BASED APPROACHES; LEXICAL FEATURES; NAIVE BAYESIAN CLASSIFIER; SIMPLE APPROACH; WORD SENSE DISAMBIGUATION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 85119663126     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. E. Brill and J. Wu. 1998. Classifier combination for improved lexical disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Montreal.
2. R. Bruce and J. Wiebe. 1994. Word-sense disambiguation using decomposable models. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 139-146.
3. T. Dietterich. 1997. Machine-learning research: Four current directions. AI magazine, 18 (4) :97-136.
4. P. Domingos and M. Pazzani. 1997. On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Machine Learning, 29:103-130.
5. R. Duda and P. Hart. 1973. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. Wiley, New York, NY.
6. W. Gale, K. Church, and D. Yarowsky. 1992. A method for disambiguating word senses in a large corpus. Computers and the Humanities, 26:415-439.
7. J. Henderson and E. Brill. 1999. Exploiting diversity in natural language processing: Combining parsers. In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, College Park, MD, June.
8. C. Leacock, G. Towell, and E. Voorhees. 1993. Corpus-based statistical sense resolution. In Proceedings of the ARPA Workshop on Human Language Technology, pages 260-265, March.
9. C. Leacock, M. Chodorow, and G. Miller. 1998. Using corpus statistics and WordNet relations for sense identification. Computational Linguistics, 24(1):147-165, March.
10. R. Mooney. 1996. Comparative experiments on disambiguating word senses: An illustration of the role of bias in machine learning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 82-91, May.
11. H. T. Ng and H. B. Lee. 1996. Integrating multiple knowledge sources to disambiguate word sense: An exemplar-based approach. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Society for Computational Linguistics, pages 40-47.
12. T. Pedersen and R. Bruce. 1997. A new supervised learning algorithm for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 604-609, Providence, RI, July.
13. T. Pedersen, R. Bruce, and J. Wiebe. 1997. Sequential model selection for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pages 388-395, Washington, DC., April.
14. T. Pedersen. 2000. An ensemble approach to corpus-based word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, pages 205-218, Mexico City, February.
15. G. Towell and E. Voorhees. 1998. Disambiguating highly ambiguous words. Computational Linguistics, 24 (1) :125-146, March.