The science of interaction

Information Visualization

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 263-274

  Pike, William A ^a   Stasko, John ^b   Chang, Remco ^c   O'Connell, Theresa A ^d  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Interaction theory; Reasoning; Visual analytics

Indexed keywords

BEST PRACTICE; COLLABORATION; EMBODIED INTERACTION; HUMAN-INFORMATION INTERACTION; INTENTIONALITY; INTERACTION THEORY; INTERACTIVE MANIPULATION; PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN; REASONING; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; VISUAL ANALYTICS; VISUAL DISPLAY; VISUAL INTERFACE;

INTEROPERABILITY; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 70349308587     PISSN: 14738716     EISSN: 14738724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/ivs.2009.22     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Thomas, J.J. and Cook, K.A (eds.) (2005) Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. Los Alamitos. CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
2. Peirce, C. (1905) What pragmatism is. The Monist 15(2): 161-181.
3. Solomon, K., Medin, D. and Lynch, E. (1999) Concepts do more than categories. Cognitive Science 3(3): 99-104.
4. Clancey, W. (1994) Situated cognition: How representations are created and given meaning. In: R. Lewis and P. Mendelsohn (eds.), Lessons from Learning. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland, pp. 231-242.
5. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Lemke, J. (1997) Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In: D. Kirshner, and J. Whitson (eds.), Situated Cognition: Social, Semiotic, and Psychological Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 37-55.
7. Hutchins, E. (1995) Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: Massachusets Institute of Technology Press.
8. Kirsch, D. (2006) Distributed cognition: A methodological note. Pragmatics and Cognition 14(2): 249-262.
9. Liu, Z., Nersessian, N. and Stasko, J. (2008) Distribution cognition as a theoretical framework for information visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14(6): 1173-1180.
10. Kant, I. and Pluhar, W. S. (1987) Critique of Judgment. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
11. Gadamer, H.-G. (1975) Truth and Method. New York: Continuum.
12. Amar, R., Eagan, J. and Stasko, J. (2005) Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization. In: J. Stasko, and M. Ward (eds.), 2005 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization. Minneapolis, MN. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 111-117.
13. Jankun-Kelly, T., Ma, K. and Gertz, M. (2007) A model and framework for visualization exploration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13(2): 357-369.
14. Shrinivasan, Y. and van Wijk, J. (2008) Supporting the analytical reasoning process in information visualization. In: M. Czerwinski and A. Lund (eds.) CHI 2008, Proceeding of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 5-10 April. Florence, Italy. NY: Association for Computing Machinery Press, pp. 1237-1246.
15. Yi, J., Kang, Y., Stasko, J. and Jacko, J. (2007) Toward a deeper understanding of the role of interaction in information visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13(6): 1224-1231.
16. Peirce, C. (1877) Fixation of belief. Popular Science Monthly 12(November): 1-15.
17. Lam, H. (2008) A framework of interaction costs in information visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14(6): 1149-1156.
18. Buering, T., Gerken, J. and Reiterer, H. (2006) User interaction with scatterplots on small screens-A comparative evaluation of geometric-semantic zoom and fisheye distortion. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12(5): 829-836.
19. Kim, S., Jang, Y., Mellema, A., Ebert, D. and Collins, T. (2007) Visual analytics on mobile devices for emergency response. In: W. Ribarsky and J. Dill (eds.) IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology: VAST '07; 30 October-1 November. Sacramento, CA. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 35-42.
20. Yost, B. and North, C. (2006) The perceptual scalability of visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12(5): 837-844.
21. Smith, G. et al. (2006) FacetMap: A scalable search and browse visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12(5): 797-804.
22. Dourish P. (2001) Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
23. White, S. and Feiner, S. (2009) SiteLens: Situated visualization techniques for urban site visits. In: D.R. Olson et al. (ed.), Proceedings of the Twentyseventh Annual SIBCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Boston, MA. NY: Association for Computing Machinery Press, pp. 1117-1120.
24. Gotz, D. and Zhou, M. (2009) Characterizing users' visual analytic activity for insight provenance. Information Visualization 8(1): 42-55.
25. Dou, W. et al. (2009) Recovering reasoning processes from user interactions. Computer Graphics and Applications 29(3): 52-61.
26. Heer, J., Mackinlay, J., Stolte, C. and Agrawala, M. (2008) Graphical histories for visualization: Supporting analysis, communication, and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14(6): 1189-1196.
27. Silva, C., Freire, J. and Callahan, S. (2007) Provenance for visualizations: Reproducibility and beyond. Computing in Science and Engineering 9(5): 82-89.
28. Xiao, L., Gerth, J. and Hanrahan, P. (2006) Enhancing visual analysis of network traffic using a knowledge representation. In: P. C. Wong and D. Keim (eds.) 2006 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology: VAST '06; 31 October-2 November. Baltimore, MD, NY: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 107-114.
29. Mackinlay, J., Hanrahan, P. and Stolte, C. (2007) Show me: Automatic presentation for visual analysis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13(6): 1137-1144.
30. Robinson, A. (2008) Collaborative synthesis of visual analytic results. In: D. Ebert and T. Ertl (eds.) Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology: VAST '08; 21-23 October. Columbus, OH, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 19-24.
31. Brennan, S. et al. (2006) Toward a multi-analyst, collaborative framework for visual analytics. In: P.C. Wong, and D. Keim (eds.), IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology: VAST '06; 31 October-2 November, Baltimore, MD. NY: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 129-136.
32. Heer, J. and Agrawala, M. (2008) Design considerations for collaborative visual analytics. Information Visualization 7(1): 49-62.
33. Tomaszewski, B. and MacEachren, A. (2006) A distributed spatiotemporal cognition approach to visualization in support of coordinated group activity. In: J. Landgren and S. Jul, (eds.) Third International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM 2006); 10-13 May, Gothenburg, Sweden. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg. http://www.iscram.org/ ISCRAM2009/papers/, accessed 13 August 2009.
34. Isenberg, P. and Fisher, D. (2009) Collaborative brushing and linking for co-located visual analysis of document collections. Computer Graphics Forum 28(3): 1031-1038.
35. Ziemkiewicz, C. and Kosara, R. (2008) The shaping of information by visual metaphors. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14(6): 1269-1276.
36. Pike, W. et al. (2009) The Scalable reasoning system: Lightweight visualization for distributed analytics. Information Visualization 8(1): 71-84.
37. Scholtz, J., Cook, K., Whiting, M., Lemon, D. and Greenblatt, H. (2009) Visual analytics technology transition progress. Information Visualization 8(4): 294-301.
38. Plaisant, C., Fekete, J. and Grinstein, G. (2008) Promoting insight-based evaluation of visualizations: From contest to benchmark repository. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14(1): 120-134.
39. Amar, R. and Stasko, J. (2004) A knowledge task-based framework from design and evaluation of information visualizations. In: M. Ward, and T. Munzner (eds.) IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis 2004); 10-12 October. Austin, TX. Piscataway, NJ, pp. 143-150.
40. Green, T., Ribarsky, W. and Fisher, B. (2008) Visual analytics for complex concepts using a human cognition model. In: D. Ebert and T. Ertl (eds.) IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology: VAST '08; 21-23 October. Columbus, OH, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 91-98.
41. International Standards Organization (ISO) (1998) Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). In: Part 11: Guidance on Usability. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO. ISO Standard Number: ISO 9241-9311:1998.
42. Chang, R., Ziemkiewicz, C., Green, T. and Ribarsky, W. (2009) Defining insight for visual analytics. Computer Graphics and Applications 29(2): 14-17.
43. Plaisant, C. (2004) The challenge of information visualization evaluation. In: M.F. Costabile (ed.), Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI 2004); 25-28 May, Gallipoli, Italy. NY: Association for Computing Machinery Press, pp. 109-116.
44. Isenberg, P., Zuk, T., Collins, C. and Carpendale, S. (2008) Grounded evaluation of information visualizations. In: E. Bertini, A. Perer, C. Plaisant, and G. Santucci (eds.), Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Information Visualization (BELIV 2008); 5 April, Florence, Italy. NY: Association for Computing Machinery Press, pp. 56-63.