A Framework of interaction costs in information visualization

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1149-1156

  Lam, Heidi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Framework; Information visualization; Interaction; Interface evaluation

Indexed keywords

DECISION COSTS; FRAMEWORK; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; INFORMATION VISUALIZATIONS; INTERACTION; INTERACTION COSTS; INTERFACE EVALUATION; MULTIPLE INPUTS; POWER COSTS; SYSTEM OPERATIONS; USABILITY PROBLEMS; USER STUDIES; VISUALIZATION DESIGNS;

CELLULAR RADIO SYSTEMS; FLOW INTERACTIONS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; VISUALIZATION;

COSTS;

EID: 54949086323     PISSN: 10772626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2008.109     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (70)

1. *J. Ahello et al. ASK-Graph View: A Large Scale Graph Visualization System, volume 12, pages 669-676, 2006.
2. C. Ahlberg and B. Shneiderman. Visual Information Seeking: Tight Coupling for Dynamic Query Filters with Starfield Displays. In Proc ACM CHI, pages 313-317, 1994.
3. M. Beaudouin-Lafon. Designing Interaction, Not Interfaces. In Proc ACM AVI, pages 15-22, 2004.
4. B. Bederson. Fisheye Menus. In Proc ACM UIST'00, pages 217-226, 2000.
5. *B. Bederson et al. DateLens: A Fisheye Calendar Interface for PDAs. ACM TOCHI. 11(1):90-119. March 2004.
6. *T. Buring et al. User Interaction With Scatterplots on Small Screens - A Comparative Evaluation of Geometric-Semantic Zoom and Fisheye Distortion. IEEE TVCG, L2(5):829-836, 2006.
7. S.K. Card et al. A Morphological Analysis of the Design Space of Input Devices. ACM TOIS, 9(2):99-122, 1991.
8. S.K. Card et al. Rendings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.
9. M.S.T. Carpendale et al. Three-dimensional pliable surfaces: for the Effective Presentation of Visual Information. In ACM UISTI, pages 217-226, 1995.
10. C. Chen and Y. Yu. Empirical Studies of Information Visualization: A MetaAnalysis. Intl. J. of Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS), 53:851-866, 2000.
11. E.H. Chi and J.T. Riedl. An Operator Interaction Framework for Visualization Systems. In Proc IEEE InfoVis, pages 63-70, 1998.
12. E.H. Chi et al. Using Information Scent to Model User Information Needs and Actions and the Web. In Proc ACM CHI, pages 490-497, 2001.
13. *W. Chung. Studying Information Seeking on the Non-English Web: An Experiment on a Spanish Business Web Portal. IJHCS. 64(9):811-829, 2006.
14. M. Collomb et al. Improving Drag-and-Drop on Wall-Size Display. In Proc GI, pages 25-32, 2005.
15. *M. Crampes et al. Concept Maps for Designing Adaptive Knowledge Maps. Information Visualization. 5(3):192-224, 2006.
16. P. Fitts. The Information Capacity of the Human Motor System in Controlling the Amplitude of Movement. J. Expt. Psych., 47:381-391, 1954.
17. *M. Granitzer et al. Evaluating a System for Interactive Exploration of Large. Hierarchically Structured Document Repositories. In Proc IEEE InfoVis, pages 127-134, 2004.
18. C. Gutwin. Improving Focus Targeting in Interactive Fisheye Views. In Proc ACM CHI, pages 267-274. 2002.
19. J. Heer and D. Boyd. Vizster: Visualizing Online Social Networks. In Proc IEEE InfoVis, pages 33-40, 2005.
20. *E.G. Hetzler et al. Turning the Bucket of Text into a Pipe. In Proc IEEE InfoVis, pages 89-94, 2005.
21. K. Hornbæk. Current Practice in Measuring Usability: Challenges to Usability Studies and Research. IJHCS, 64:79-102, 2006.
22. *K. Hombæk and M. Hertzum. Untangling the Usability of Fisheye Menus. ACM TOCHI, 14(2), 2007.
23. *K. Hornbæk et al.Navigation Patterns and Usability of Zoomable User Interfaces with and without an Overview. ACM TOCHI, 9(4):362-389, 2002.
24. *K. Hornbæk et al. Reading Patterns and Usability in Visualization of Electronic Documents. ACM TOCHI, 10(2): 119-149, 2003.
25. J.P. Hourcade et al. Differences in Pointing Task Performance between Preschool Children and Adults using Mice. ACM TOCHI, 11(4):357-386, 2004.
26. G.S. Hubona et al. The Effects of Motion and Stereopsis on Three-dimensional Visualization. IJHCS, 47(5):609-627, 1997.
27. R.J.K. Jacob et al. Integrality and Separability of Input Devices. ACM TOCHI, 1(1):3-26, 1994.
28. T.J. Jankun-Kelly et al. A Model and Framework for Visualization Exploration. IEEE TVCG, 13(2):357-369, 2007.
29. S. Jul and G. W. Furnas. Critical Zones in Desert Fog: Aids to Multiscale Navigation. In Proc ACM UIST. pages 97-106, 1998.
30. *H. Kang et al. NetLens: Iterative Exploration of Content-Action Network Data. Information Visualization, 6(1): 18-31, 2007.
31. C. Klein and B.B. Bederson. Benefits of Animated Scrolling. In Extended Abstracts of CHI, pages 1965-1968, 2005.
32. *A. Kobsa. An Empirical Comparison of Three Commerical Information Visualization Systems. In Proc IEEE InfoVis, pages 123-130. 2001.
33. *H.P. Kumar et al. Browsing Hierarchical Data with Multi-level Dynamic Queries and Pruning. IJHCS, 46(1): 103-124, 1997.
34. *H. Lam et al. Overview Use in Multiple Visual Information Resolution Interfaces. IEEE TVCG, 13(6):1278-1283, 2007.
35. *Q. Li and C. North. Empirical Comparison of Dynamic Query Sliders And Brushing Histograms. In Proc IEEE InfoVis, pages 147-153, 2003.
36. *M.J. McGuffin and R. Balakrishnan. Fitts' Law and Expanding Targets: Experimental Studies and Designs for User Interfaces. ACM TOCHI, 12(4):388-422, 2005.
37. *M.J. McGuffin et al. Expand-ahead: A Space-Filling Strategy for Browsing Trees. In Proc IEEE InfoVis, pages 119-126, 2004.
38. K. Misue et al. Layout Adjustment and the Mental Map. J. of Visual Languages and Computing, 6(2): 183-210, 1995.
39. D.A. Norman. The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday/Currency, 1990.
40. D.A. Norman. Things that Make Us Smart. Basic Books, 1993.
41. D.A. Norman. The Design of Future Things. Basic Books, 2007.
42. *C. North and B. Shneiderman. Snap-Togelher Visualization: Can Users Construct and Operale Coordinated Visualizations. IJHCS, 53(5):715-739, 2000.
43. C. Olson and E.H. Chi. ScentTrails: Integrating Browsing and Search on ihe Web. ACM TOCHI, 10(3):177-197, 2003.
44. P. Pirolli and S.K. Card. Information Foraging. Psych. Review. 106:643-675, 1999.
45. P. Pirolli and S.K. Card. Sensemaking Processes of Inlelligence Analysis and Possible Leverage Poinls as Identified Through Cognitive Task Analysis. In Proc Intl. Conf. on Intelligence Analysis, 2005.
46. C. Plaisant. The Challenge of Information Visualization Evaluation. In Proc ACM AVI, pages 109-116, 2004.
47. *M. Plumlee and C. Ware. Zooming versus Multiple Window Interfaces: Cognitive Costs of Visual Comparisons. TOCHI, 13(2):179-209, 2006.
48. R. Rao and S.K. Card. Table Lens: Merging Graphical and Symbolic Representations in An Interactive Focus Plus Context Visualization for Tabular Information. In Proc ACM CHI, pages 318-322, 1994.
49. X. Ren and S. Moriya. Improving Selection Performance on Pen-Based Systems: A Study of Pen-Based Interaction for Selection Tasks. ACM TOCHI, 7(3):384-416, 2000.
50. J.C. Roberts. Multiple-View and Multiform Visualization. In Visual Data Exploration and Analysis VII. Proc SPIE 3960, pages 176-185, 2000.
51. G.G. Robertson et al. The Cognitive Coprocessor Architecture for Interactive User Interfaces. In Proc ACM UIST, pages 10-18, 1989.
52. D.M. Russell et al. The Cost Structure of Sensemaking. In Proc ACM CHI, pages 269-276, 1993.
53. * P. Saraiya et al. An Evalualion of Microarray Visualizalion Tools for Biological Insight. In Proc IEEE InfoVis. pages 1-8, 2004.
54. *P. Saraiya et al Visualization of Graphs with Associated Timeseries Data. In Proc IEEE InfoVis, pages 225-232, 2005.
55. B. Schwartz. The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. HarperCollins, 2004.
56. *A. Sears and B. Shneiderman. Split Menus: Effectively Using Seleclion Frequency to Organize Menus. ACM TOCHI, 1(1):27-51, 1994.
57. K. Sedig et al. Application of Information Visualization Techniques to the Design of a Mathematical Mindtool: A Usability Study. Information Visualization, 2(3):142-159, 2003.
58. *K. Shi et al. An Evaluation of Content Browsing Techniques for Hierarchical Space-Filling Visualizations. In Proc IEEE InfoVis, pages 81-88, 2005.
59. *H. Siirtola and E. Mäkinen. Constructing and Reconstructing the Reorderable Matrix. Information Visulization, 4(1):32-48, 2005.
60. M.W. Smith et al. Aging, Motor Control, and the Performance of Computer Mouse Tasks. Human Factors, 41(3):589-596, 1999.
61. R. Spence. A framework for Navigation. IJHCS, 51 (5):919-945, 1999.
62. *A.G. Sutcliffe et al. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Visual User Interfaces for Information Retrieval. IJHCS, 53(5):741-763, 2000.
63. J. Teevan. The Research Engine: Simultaneous Support for Finding and Re-Finding. In Proc ACM VIST, pages 23-32, 2007.
64. M.O. Ward. XmdvTool: Integrating Multiple Methods for Visualizing Multivariate Data. In Proc IEEE Vis, pages 326-333, 1994.
65. *S.J. Westerman et al. Browsing a Document Collection Represented in Two- and Three-Dimensional Virtual Information Space. UHCS, 62(6):713-736, 2005.
66. W. WillettWillen et al. Seemed Widgets: Improving Navigation Cues with Embedded Visualizations. IEEE TVCG. 13(6):1129-1136, 2007.
67. T. Winograd and C.F. Flores. Understanding Computers and Cognition. Ablex Publishing Corp., 1986.
68. *J.S. Yi et al. Dust & Magnet: Multivariate Information Visualizalion Using a Magnet Metaphor. Information Visualization, 4(4):239-256, 2005.
69. J.S. Yi et al. Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Role of Interaction in Information Visualization. In Proc IEEE InfoVis, pages 1224-1231, 2007.
70. A. Zanella et al. On the Effects of Viewing Cues in Comprehending Distortions. In ACM CHI, pages 119-128, 2002.