Toward a multi-analyst, collaborative framework for visual analytics

IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology 2006, VAST 2006 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 129-136

  Brennan, Susan E ^a   Mueller, Klaus ^a,b   Zelinsky, Greg ^a   Ramakrishnan, I V ^a,b   Warren, David S ^a,b   Kaufman, Arie ^a,b  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Stony Brook University   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative and distributed visualization; Data management and knowledge representation; Visual analytics; Visual knowledge discovery

Indexed keywords

DISTRIBUTED VISUALIZATION; VIEWPOINTS; VISUAL ANALYTICS; VISUAL KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DATA MINING; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; VISUALIZATION;

VISUAL SERVOING;

EID: 34948837189     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/VAST.2006.261439     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Brennan, S. E., "How conversation is shaped by visual and spoken evidence", In Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions, J. C. Trueswell and M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pages 95-129, 2005.
2. Brennan, S. E., and Clark, H. H ., "Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 6:1482-1493, 1996.
3. Brennan, S. E., and Lockridge, C B., "Computer-mediated communication: A cognitive science approach", ELL2, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Edition, K. Brown (Ed.), Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, UK, pages 775-780, 2006.
4. Carroll, J. M., Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1995.
5. Carroll, J. M. and Rosson, M. B., "Getting around the task-artifact cycle: How to make claims and design by scenario", ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 10:181-212, 1992.
6. Clark, H.H., Using language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.
7. Clark, H. H. and Brennan, S. E., "Grounding in communication", In Perspectives on socially shared cognition, L. B. Resnick, J. Levine, and S. D. Teasley (Eds.), APA, Washington, DC, pages 127-149, 1991.
8. Reprinted in Groupware and computer-supported cooperative work: Assisting human-human collaboration, R. M. Baecker (Ed.), Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, CA, pages 222-233, 1992.
9. Clarke, L., "The use of scenarios by user interface designers", In HCI '91 Conference on People and Computers VI, D. Diaper and N. Hammnd (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pages 103-115, 1991.
10. Coffman, T., Greenblatt, S., and Marcus, S. "Graph-based technologies for intelligence analysis", In Communications of the ACM, 47(3):45-47, March 2004.
11. Fussell, S. R., Setlock, L. D., and Kraut, R. E., "Effects of headmounted and scene-oriented video systems on remote collaboration on physical tasks", In Proc., Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), ACM Press, pages 513-520, 2003.
12. Gergle, D., Kraut, R. E., and Fussell, S. R., "Language efficiency and visual technology: Minimizing collaborative effort with visual information", Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 23(4):491-517, 2004.
13. Gersh, J., Lewis, B., Montemayor, J., Piatko, C., and Turner, R. "Supporting insight-based information exploration in intelligence analysis, Communications of the ACM, 49(4):63-68, April 2006.
14. Herman, I., Melancon, G., and Marshall, M. S., "Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: A survey", In IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 6(1):24-43, 2000.
15. Heuer, R. J. Psychology of Intelligence Analysis, Center for the Study of Intelligence, U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, www.cia.gov/books/ 19104/, 1999.
16. Hong, L., Muraki, S., Kaufman, A., Bartz, D., and He, T., "Virtual Voyage: Interactive Navigation in the Human Colon", In Computer Graphics, Proc. SIGGRAPH, pages 27-34, 1997.
17. Karat, J. and Bennett, J. B., "Using scenarios in design meetings: A case study example", In Taking Design Seriously: Practical Techniques for Human Computer Interaction Design, J. Karat (Ed.), Academic Press, pages 63-94.
18. Kifer, M. and Subrahmanian, V. S., "Theory of generalized annotated logic programming and its applications", Journal of Logic Programming, 12(4), pp. 335-368, 1992.
19. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., and Siegel, J., "Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks", Human Computer Interaction, 18:13-49, 2003.
20. Lloyd, J. W., Foundations of Logic Programming (2nd Edition), Springer Verlag, 1987.
21. Neider, M., Chen, X., Dickinson, C., Brennan, S. E., and Zelinsky, G., "Sharing eyegaze is better than speaking in a time-critical consensus task", In Abstracts of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, 10, page 72, 2005.
22. Pemmasani, G., Guo, H., Dong, Y., C. R. Ramakrishnan, C. R., and Ramakrishnan, I. V., "Online justification for tabled logic programs", In Proc., 7th International Symposium on Functional and Logic Programming (FLOPS'04), pages 24-38, April, 2004.
23. Pirolli, P. and Card, S., "The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis", In Proc., International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, 2005.
24. Schrijvers, T. and Warren, D. S., "Constraint Handling Rules and Tabled Execution", In Proc., 20th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP), pages 120-136, 2004.
25. Wright, W., Schroh, D., Proulx, P., Skaburskis, A., and Cort, B. "The sandbox for analysis - concepts and methods", In Proc., Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), ACM Press, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pages 801-810, 2006.