Framework for consumer-integrated optimal product design

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 48, Issue 18, 2009, Pages 8566-8574

  Smith, Beverly V ^a   Ierapepritou, Marianthi ^a  

^a The State University of New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPROMISED SOLUTION; DESIGN SPACES; EFFICIENT POINT; OPTIMAL DESIGN; PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION; RAPID PRODUCT DESIGN; TIME TO MARKET;

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 70349306843     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie900377e     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Charpentier, J. C., McKenna, F. Managing Complex Systems: Some Trends for The Future of Chemical and Process Engineering. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2004, 59, 1617-1640.
2. Gani, R. Chemical Product Design: Challenges and Opportunities. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2004, 28, 2441-2457. (Pubitemid 39582730)
3. Cussler, E. L., Moggridge, G. D. Chemical Product Design, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press: New York, 2001.
4. Hill, M. Product and Process Design for Structured Products. AIChE J. 2004, 50 (8), 1656-1661.
5. Bagajewicz, M. J. On the Role of Microeconomics, Planning and Finances in Product Design. AIChE J. 2007, 53 (12), 3155-3170.
6. Wibowo, C., Ng, K. Product-Oriented Process Synthesis and Development: Creams and Pastes. AIChE J. 2001, 47 (12), 2746-2767.
7. Ng, K., Gani, R., Dam-Johansen, K. Chemical Product Design: A PerspectiVe Through Case Studies; Elsevier: New York, 2007.
8. Stephanopoulos, G. In InVention and InnoVation in a Product- Centered Chemical Industry: General Trends and a Case Study. AIChE Conference, 55th Institute Lecture, San Francisco, CA, Nov 2003.
9. Tanguy, D., Marchal, P. Relations Between the Properties of Particles and Their Process of Manufacture. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1996, 74, 715.
10. Pisano, G. P., The Development Factory: Unlocking the Potential of Process Innovation; Harvard School Press: Boston, MA, 1997.
11. Viladsen, J. Putting Structure into Chemical Engineering. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1997, 52, 2857.
12. Wintermantel, K. Process and Product Engineering Achievements, Present and Future Challenges. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1999, 77, 175.
13. Westerberg, A. W., Subrahmanian, E. Product Design. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24, 959-966.
14. Wibowo, C., Ng, K. Product-Centered Processing: Manufacture of Chemical-Based Consumer Products. AIChE J. 2002, 48 (6), 1212-1230.
15. Charpentier, J. C. The Triplet " Molecular Processes-product process" Engineering: the future of chemical engineering. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57, 4667-4690.
16. Solvason, C., Chemmangattuvalappil, N. G., Eljack, F. T., Eden, M. R. Efficient Visual Mixture Design of Experiments using Property Clustering Techniques. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 2245-2256.
17. Solvason, C., Chemmangattuvalappil, N. G., Eden, M. R. A Systematic Method for Integrating Product Attributes Within Molecular Synthesis. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2009, 33, 977-991.
18. Yang, Y. S., Jang, B. S., Yeun, Y. S., Lee, H. K., Lee, K. Y. Quality Function Deployment-Based and Exploration for Ambiguity. J. Eng. Des. 2003, 14 (1), 83-113.
19. Besharati, B., Azarm, S., Farhangmehr, A. In A Customer-based Expected Utility Metric for Product Design Selection, ASME IDETC, Montreal, Canada, Sept 2002.
20. Green, P. E., Srinivasan, V. Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook J. Consumer Res. 1978, 5 (2), 103-123.
21. Forman, E. H., Gass, S. I. The Analytical Hierarchy Process-An Exposition Operations Res. 2001, 49 (4), 469-486.
22. Bouchereau, V., Rowlands, H. Methods and Techniques to Help Quality Function Deployment. Benchmarking: Int. J. 2000, 7 (1), 8-19.
23. See, T., Gurnani A., Lewis, K. Multi-Attribute Decision Making Using Hypothetical Equivalents and Inequivalents. J. Mech. Des. 2004, 126, 950-957.
24. Yoon, C. H., Kim, Y. P. Redesigned Quality Function Deployment Process to Ensure Customer Satisfactio Int. J. Business InnoV. Res. 2006, 1 (1/2), 149-169.
25. Li, H., Azarm, S. Product Design Selection Under Uncertainty and With Competitive Advantage. ASME J. Mech. Des. 2000, 122, 411-418.
26. Scott, M. J., Antonsson, E. K. Compensation and Weights for Tradeoffs in Engineering Design: Beyond the Weighted Sum. ASME J. Mech. Des. 2005, 127, 1045-1055.
27. Sen, P. Communicating Preferences in Multiple-Criteria Decision Making: The Role of the Designer. J. Eng. Des. 2001, 12 (1), 15-24.
28. de Weck, O. Determining Product Platform Extent. In Product Platform and Product Family Design: Methods and Applications; Simpson, T. W., Siddique, Z., Jiao, J., Eds., Springer: New York, 2006; pp 241- 301.
29. Arora, J. S. Introduction to Optimal Design; Elsevier Academic Press: New York, 2004.
30. Steuer, R. E. Multiple Criteria Optimization Theory, Computation and Application; Krieger: Malabar, FL, 1996.
31. Sayin, S., Kouvelis, P. The Multiobjective Discrete Optimization Problem: A Weighted min-max two Stage Optimization Approach and a Bicriteria Algorithm. Manage. Sci. 2005, 51, 1572-1581.
32. Ehrgott, M., Gandibleux, X. Multiobjective Combinatorial Optimization- Theory, Methodology and Applications. In Multiple Criteria Optimization: State of the Art Annotated Bibliographic SurVeys; Ehrgott, M., Gandibleux, Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers: New York, 2002; pp 369-444.
33. Bérubé, J.-F., Gendreau, M., Potvin, J.-Y. An Exact e-Constraint Method for Bi-objective Combinatorial Optimization Problems: Application to the Travelling Salesman Problem with Profits. Eur. J. Operation Res. 2009, 194, 39-50.
34. Herh, P., Tkachuk, J., Wu, S., Bernzen, M., Rudolph, B. The Rheology of Pharmaceutical and Cosmetics Semisolids. Am. Lab. 1998, 30 (15), 12-14.
35. Bernardo, F. P., Saraiva, M. Integrated Process and Product Design Optimization: A Cosmetic Emulsion Application. In European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering; Elsevier Science B.V.: New York, 2005.
36. Shrout, P. E., Fleiss, J. L. Intraclass correlation: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol. Bull. 1979, 86, 420-428.
37. McGraw, K. O., Wong, S. P. Forming Inferences About Some Intraclass Correlation Coefficients. Psychol. Methods 1996, 1 (4), 390.
38. Scheffe, H. Experiment With Mixtures. J. R. Stat. Soc. 1958, 20, 344-360.
39. Mavrotas, G., Diakoulaki, D. Multi-criteria Branch and Bound: A Vector Maximization Algorithm for Mixed 0-1 Multiple Objective Linear Programming. Appl. Math. Comput. 2005, 171, 53-71.
40. Pena, L. E., Lee, B. L., Stearns, J. F. Secondary Structural Rheology of a Model Cream. J. Soc. Cosmetic Chem. 1994, 45 (2), 77-84.
41. Miller, D., Löffler, M. Rheological Effects with Hydrophobically Modified Polymer, Colloids and Surfaces. Physiochem. Eng. Aspects 2006, 288, 165-169.
42. Pellis, L., Franssen-van Hal, N. L. W., Burema, J., Keijer, J. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient Applied for Evaluation of data Correction Labeling Methods and Rectal Biopsy Sampling in DNA Microarray Experiments. Physiol. Genomics 2003, 16, 99-106.
43. Futrell, D. When Quality is a Matter of Taste, Use Reliability Indexes. Quality Progress 1995, 1-6.
44. Förster, A. H., Herrington, T. M. Rheology of two Commercially Available Oil in Water Emulsions. Int. J. Cosmetic Sci. 1998, 20, 317- 328.
45. Reiner, M. The Deborah Number. Phys. Today 1964, 17, 62Ž