Quality function deployment-based optimization and exploration for ambiguity

Journal of Engineering Design

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 83-113

  Yang, Y S ^a   Jang, B S ^a   Yeun, Y S ^b   Lee, K H ^c   Lee, K Y ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Daejin University   (South Korea)

^c Inha University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT (QFD);

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COSTS; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; FUNCTIONS; PARETO PRINCIPLE;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037650083     PISSN: 09544828     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0954482031000078072     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ALEXANDROV, N. M., DENNIS, JR., J. E., LEWIS, R. M. and TORCZON, V., 1998, A trust region framework for managing the use of approximation models in optimization. Structural Optimization, 15, 16-23.
2. BOOKER, A. J., DENNIS, JR., J. E., FRANK, P. D., SERAFINI, D. B., TORCZON, V. and TROSSET, M. W., 1999, A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates. Structural Optimization, 17, 1-13.
3. CHAN, L. K. and WU, M. L., 1998, Prioritizing the technical measures in quality function deployment, Quality Engineering, 10, 467-479.
4. COHEN, J. L., 1985, Multicriteria programming: brief review and application. In: Design Optimization, edited by J. S. Gero (Sydney: Academic Press).
5. CRESSIE, N., 1986, Kriging nonstationary data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 625-634.
6. CRESSIE, N., 1991, Statistics for Spatial Data (New York: John Wiley & Sons), pp. 1-143.
7. DAS, I. and DENNIS, J. E., 1998. Normal-boundary intersection: a new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 8, 631-657.
8. GUINTA, L. R. and PRAIZLER, N. C., 1993, The QFD Book: The Team Approach to Solving Problems and Satisfying Customers through Quality Function Deployment (New York: AMACOM).
9. IGNIZIO, J. P., 1982, Linear Programming in Single & Multiple Objective Systems (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).
10. KEENEY, R. and RAIFFA, H., 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (New York: Wiley).
11. KIM, K. J., 1997-98, Determining optimal design characteristic levels in quality function deployment, Quality Engineering, 10, 295-307.
12. MOSKOWITZ, H. and KIM, K. J., 1997, QFD optimizer: a novice friendly quality function deployment support decision-support system for optimizing product designs, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 32, 641-655.
13. PHADKE, M. S., 1989, Quality Engineering Using Robust Design (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).
14. PRASAD, B., 1996, Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals, Vol. 1 (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).
15. SAATY, T. L., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process (New York: McGraw-Hill).
16. SHILLITO, M. L., 1994, Advanced QFD: Linking Technology to Market and Company Needs (New York: John Wiley & Sons).
17. SIMPSON, T. W., 1998, A concept exploration method for product family design. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
18. SMITH, W. F., KAMAL, S. and MISTREE, F., 1987, The influence of hierarchy decision on ship design, Marine Technology, 24, 131-142.
19. TAGUCHI, G., 1986, Introduction to Quality Engineering (Dearborn, MI: Asian Productivity Organization, Distributed by American Supplier Institute Inc.)
20. THURSTON, D. L., CARNAHAN, J. V. and Liu, T., 1994, Optimization of design utility, Journal of Mechanical Design, 116, 801-808.
21. TOROPOV, V. V., 1989, Simulation approach to structural optimization, Structural Optimization, 1, 37-46.
22. YANG, Y. S., JANG, B. S., JUNG, H. S. and YEUN, Y. S., 2000, Framework for managing approximation models in place of expensive simulations in Optimization, Proceedings of the 2nd ASMO UK/ISSMO Conference on Engineering Design Optimization, UK, July, 10th-11th, pp. 10-11.
23. YANG, Y. S., JANG, B. S., YEUN, Y. S. and RUY, W. S., 2002, Forthcoming, Managing approximation models in multi-objective optimization. Structural Optimization, 24, 141-156.