A new diagnostic mechanism of instruction: A dynamic, real-time and non-interference quantitative measurement technique for adaptive E-learning

International Journal of Distance Education Technologies

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 85-96

  Hsu, Pi Shan ^a   Chang, Te Jeng ^b   Wu, Ming Hsiung ^b,c  

^a CHING KUO INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT AND HEALTH   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c CHINA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Adaptive E Learning; Cognitive Load Theory; Diagnostic Mechanism; Measurement Technique; Non Interference; Real Time

Indexed keywords

DYNAMICS; E-LEARNING; EFFICIENCY;

ADAPTIVE E-LEARNING; COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY; MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES; NON INTERFERENCE; REAL TIME;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 70349280597     PISSN: 15393100     EISSN: 15393119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jdet.2009070105     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Allal, L., & Ducrey, G.P. (2000). Assessment of - or in - the zone of proximal development. Learning and Instruction, 10, 137-152.
2. Baddeley, A.D. (1986). WorkingMemory. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Blessing, S.B., & Anderson, J.R. (1996). How people learn to skip steps. Jrnal ofExperimental Psychology: Learn, Memory, Cognition, 22, 576-598. Bloom, B.S. (1968). Mastery learning. Evaluation Comment, 1, 1-16.
4. Brunken, R., Plass, J.L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychology, 38, 53-62.
5. Camp, G., Paas, F., Rikers, R., & van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (2001). Dynamic problem selection in air traffic control training: a comparison between performance, mental effort and mental efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 575-595.
6. Huang, M.J., Huang, H.S., & Chen, M.Y. (2007). Constructing a personalized e-learning system based on genetic algorithm and case-based reasoning approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 33, 551-564.
7. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychology, 38, 23-31.
8. Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2004). Measuring knowledge to optimize cognitive load factors during instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 558-568.
9. Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2005). Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive e-learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53(3), 83-93.
10. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J.E., Tabbers, H., & van Gerven, P. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology, 38, 63-71. (Pubitemid 36400005)
11. Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: an approach to combine mental effort and performance measure. Human Factor, 35, 737-743.
12. Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 51-71.
13. Salden, R.J.C.M., Paas, F., Broers, N.J., & van Merrienboer, J.J.G. (2004). Mental effort and performance as determinants for the dynamic selection of learning tasks in air traffic control training. Instructional Science, 32, 153-172.
14. Salden, R.J.C.M., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (2006). A comparison of approaches to learning task selection in the training of complex cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 321-333.
15. Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 43, 215-266.
16. Sweller, J., Mawer, R., & Ward, M. (1983). Development of expertise in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 639-661.
17. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J.J.G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-285.
18. van Gerven, P., Paas, F., van Merrienboer, J.J.G., & Schmidt, H.G. (2004). Memory load and the cognitive papillary response in aging. Psychophysiology, 41, 167-174.
19. van Merriënboer, J.J.G. & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147-177.