Comparison of portable automated keratometry and manual keratometry for IOL calculation

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 1213-1216

  Manning, C A ^a   Kloess, P M ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMETRY; LENS IMPLANT; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

EID: 0030781960     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80318-5     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. DR Sanders J Retzlaff MC Kraff Comparison of the SRK II™ formula and other second generation formulas J Cataract Refract Surg 14 1988 136 141
2. MJ Cuaycong CA Gay J Emery Comparison of the accuracy of computerized videokeratography and keratometry for use in intraocular lens calculations J Cataract Refract Surg 19 1993 178 181
3. DD Koch JS Wakil SW Samuelson EA Haft Comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of the keratometer and the EyeSys Corneal Analysis System Model I J Cataract Refract Surg 18 1992 342 347
4. MK Tsilimbaris IG Vlachonikolis D Siganos Comparison of keratometric readings as obtained by Javal Ophthalmometer and Corneal Analysis System (EyeSys) Refract Corneal Surg 7 1991 368 373
5. DG Tennen RH Keates C Montoya Comparison of three keratometry instruments J Cataract Refract Surg 21 1995 407 408
6. T Olsen Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation J Cataract Refract Surg 18 1992 125 129
7. SC Richards RJ Olson WL Richards Factors associated with poor predictability by intraocular lens calculation formulas Arch Ophthalmol 103 1985 515 518