Molecular signature of epistatic selection: Interrogating genetic interactions in the sex-ratio meiotic drive of Drosophila simulans

Genetics Research

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 171-182

  Chevin, Luis Miguel ^a,b,e   Bastide, Héloïse ^c   Montchamp Moreau, Catherine ^c   Hospital, Frédéric ^d  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d UMR1313 GÉNÉTIQUE ANIMALE ET BIOLOGIE INTÉGRATIVE   (France)

^e IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA SIMULANS; GENE INTERACTION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; MEIOSIS; SEX RATIO; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DROSOPHILA SIMULANS;

EID: 70349232929     PISSN: 00166723     EISSN: 14695073     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0016672309000147     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Atlan, A., Capillon, C., Derome, N., Couvet, D. & Montchamp-Moreau, C. (2003). The evolution of autosomal suppressors of sex-ratio drive in Drosophila simulans. Genetica 117, 47-58.
2. Atlan, A., Joly, D., Capillon, C. & Montchamp-Moreau, C. (2004). Sex-ratio distorter of Drosophila simulans reduces male productivity and sperm competition ability. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17, 744-751.
3. Atlan, A., Mercot, H., Landre, C. & Montchamp-Moreau, C. (1997). The sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans: Geographical distribution of distortion and resistance. Evolution 51, 1886-1895.
4. Barton, N. H. (1998). The effect of hitch-hiking on neutral genealogies. Genetical Research, Cambridge 72, 123-133.
5. Caicedo, A. L., Stinchcombe, J. R., Olsen, K. M., Schmitt, J. & Purugganan, M. D. (2004). Epistatic interaction between Arabidopsis FRI and FLC flowering time genes generates a latitudinal cline in a life history trait. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101, 15670-15675.
6. Chevin, L. M., Billiard, S. & Hospital, F. (2008). Hitch-hiking both ways: Effect of two interfering selective sweeps on linked neutral variation. Genetics 180, 301-316.
7. Chevin, L. M. & Hospital, F. (2006). The hitchhiking effect of an autosomal meiotic drive gene. Genetics 173, 1829-1832.
8. Crow, J. (1991). Why is Mendelian segregation so exact? Bioessays 13(6), 305-312.
9. Derome, N., Baudry, E., Ogereau, D., Veuille, M. & Montchamp-Moreau, C. (2008). Selective sweeps in a 2-locus model for sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila simulans. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25, 409-416.
10. Derome, N., Metayer, K., Montchamp-Moreau, C. & Veuille, M. (2004). Signature of selective sweep associated with the evolution of sex-ratio drive in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 166, 1357-1366.
11. Ewens, W. J. (2004). Mathematical Population Genetics - I. Theoretical Introduction. New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Gavrilets, S. (2004). Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Hermisson, J. & Pennings, P. S. (2005). Soft sweeps: Molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation. Genetics 169, 2335-2352.
14. Hoekstra, H. E., Hirschmann, R. J., Bundey, R. A., Insel, P. A. & Crossland, J. P. (2006). A single amino acid mutation contributes to adaptive beach mouse color pattern. Science 313, 101-104.
15. Hudson, R. R. (2002). Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics 18, 337-338.
16. Hurst, G. D. D. & Werren, J. H. (2001). The role of selfish genetic elements in eukaryotic evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics 2, 597-606.
17. Hurst, L. D., Atlan, A. & Bengtsson, B. O. (1996). Genetic conflicts. Quarterly Review of Biology 71, 317-364.
18. Innan, H. & Kim, Y. (2004). Pattern of polymorphism after strong artificial selection in a domestication event. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101, 10667-10672.
19. Jaenike, J. (2001). Sex chromosome meiotic drive. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32, 25-49.
20. Jaenike, J. (2008). X chromosome drive. Current Biology 18, R508-R511.
21. Jutier, D., Derome, N. & Montchamp-Moreau, C. (2004). The sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans: A comparative approach. Genetica 120, 87-99.
22. Kim, Y. & Stephan, W. (2002). Detecting a local signature of genetic hitchhiking along a recombining chromosome. Genetics 160, 765-777.
23. Kim, Y. & Stephan, W. (2003). Selective sweeps in the presence of interference among partially linked loci. Genetics 163, 389-398.
24. Kirby, D. A. & Stephan, W. (1996). Multi-locus selection and the structure of variation at the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 144, 635-645.
25. Kliman, R. M., Andolfatto, P., Coyne, J. A., Depaulis, F., Kreitman, M., Berry, A. J., McCarter, J., Wakeley, J. & Hey, J. (2000). The population genetics of the origin and divergence of the Drosophila simulans complex species. Genetics 156, 1913-1931.
26. Lewontin, R. C. (1995). The detection of linkage disequilibrium in molecular sequence data. Genetics 140, 377-388.
27. Lyttle, T. W. (1991). Segregation distorters. Annual Review of Genetics 25, 511-557.
28. Maynard Smith, J. & Haigh, J. (1974). The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genetical Research, Cambridge 23, 23-35.
29. Montchamp-Moreau, C., Ogereau, D., Chaminade, N., Colard, A. & Aulard, S. (2006). Organization of the sex-ratio meiotic drive region in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 174, 1365-1371.
30. Nielsen, R. (2005). Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annual Review of Genetics 39, 197-218.
31. Nielsen, R., Williamson, S., Kim, Y., Hubisz, M. J., Clark, A. G. & Bustamante, C. D. (2005). Genomic scans for selective sweeps using SNP data. Genome Research 15, 1566-1575.
32. Palopoli, M. F. & Wu, C. I. (1996). Rapid evolution of a coadapted gene complex: Evidence from the segregation distorter (SD) system of meiotic drive in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 143, 1675-1688.
33. Przeworski, M. (2002). The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics 160, 1179-1189.
34. Przeworski, M., Coop, G. & Wall, J. D. (2005). The signature of positive selection on standing genetic variation. Evolution 59, 2312-2323.
35. Rogers, S. M. & Bernatchez, L. (2005). Integrating QTL mapping and genome scans towards the characterization of candidate loci under parallel selection in the lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis). Molecular Ecology 14, 351-361.
36. Sabeti, P. C., Reich, D. E., Higgins, J. M., Levine, H. Z., Richter, D. J., Schaffer, S. F., Gabriel, S. B., Platko, J. V., Patterson, N. J., McDonald, G. J., Ackerman, H. C., Campbell, S. J., Altshuler, D., Cooper, R., Kwiatkowski, D., Ward, R. & Lander, E. (2002). Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature 419, 832-837.
37. Tao, Y., Masly, J. P., Araripe, L., Ke, Y., Hartl, D. L. (2007). A sex-ratio meiotic drive system in Drosophila simulans. I: An autosomal suppressor. PLoS Biology 5, 2560-2575.
38. Taylor, J. E. & Jaenike, J. (2002). Sperm competition and the dynamics of X chromosome drive: Stability and extinction. Genetics 160 1721-1731.
39. Voight, B. F., Kudaravalli, S., Wen, X. & Pritchard, J. K. (2006). A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biology 4, e72.
40. Wakeley, J. & Takahashi, T. (2003). Gene genealogies when the sample size exceeds the effective size of the population. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20, 208-213.
41. Williamson, S. H., Hubisz, M. J., Clark, A. G., Payseur, B. A., Bustamante, C. D. & Nielsen, R. (2007). Localizing recent adaptive evolution in the human genome. PLoS Genetics 3, e90.