Implications of noise and resolution on mechanical properties of trabecular bone estimated by image-based finite-element analysis

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1263-1271

  Rajapakse, Chamith S ^a,d   Magland, Jeremy ^a   Zhang, Henry ^b   Liu, X Sherry ^b   Wehrli, Suzanne L ^c   Guo, X Edward ^b   Wehrli, Felix W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^c CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

^d HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Mechanical properties; MRI; Noise; Resolution; Trabecular bone

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MICROMAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIMULATION; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; TIBIA; TRABECULAR BONE; VERTEBRA BODY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIBIA;

EID: 70349200747     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20877     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. 1994. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 843:1-129. (Pubitemid 24219162)
2. Riggs BL, Melton LJ 3rd. 2002. Bone turnover matters: the raloxifene treatment paradox of dramatic decreases in vertebral fractures without commensurate increases in bone density. J Bone Miner Res 17:11-14.
3. Ulrich D, Hildebrand T, Van Rietbergen B, et al. 1997. The quality of trabecular bone evaluated with micro-computed tomography, FEA and mechanical testing. Stud Health Technol Inform 40:97-112. (Pubitemid 127103328)
4. Benito M, Gomberg B, Wehrli FW, et al. 2003. Deterioration of trabecular architecture in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1497-1502. (Pubitemid 36623360)
5. Boutroy S, Bouxsein ML, Munoz F, et al. 2005. In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:6508-6515.
6. MacNeil JA, Boyd SK. 2007. Load distribution and the predictive power of morphological indices in the distal radius and tibia by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone 41:129-137.
7. Boutry N, Cortet B, Dubois P, et al. 2003. Trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus: preliminary in vivo MR imaging assessment in men with osteoporosis. Radiology 227:708-717. (Pubitemid 36583025)
8. Link TM, Vieth V, Matheis J, et al. 2002. Bone structure of the distal radius and the calcaneus vs. BMD of the spine and proximal femur in the prediction of osteoporotic spine fractures. Eur Radiol 12:401-408.
9. Niebur GL, Feldstein MJ, Yuen JC, et al. 2000. High-resolution finite element models with tissue strength asymmetry accurately predict failure of trabecular bone. J Biomech 33:1575-1583.
10. Pistoia W, van Rietbergen B, Laib A, et al. 2001. High-resolution three-dimensional-pQCT images can be an adequate basis for in-vivo microFE analysis of bone. J Biomech Eng 123:176-183. (Pubitemid 32385202)
11. Saxena R, Keller TS, Sullivan JM. 1999. A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Scheme to Investigate the Apparent Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng 2:285-294.
12. Keaveny TM, Bouxsein ML. 2008. Theoretical Implications of the Biomechanical Fracture Threshold. J Bone Miner Res 23:1541-1547.
13. van Rietbergen B, Majumdar S, Newitt D, et al. 2002. High-resolution MRI and micro-FE for the evaluation of changes in bone mechanical properties during longitudinal clinical trials: application to calcaneal bone in postmenopausal women after one year of idoxifene treatment. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 17:81-88. (Pubitemid 34097755)
14. Zhang XH, Liu XS, Vasilic B, et al. 2008. In Vivo muMRI Based Finite Element and Morphological Analyses of Tibial Trabecular Bone in Eugonadal and Hypogonadal Men Before and After Testosterone Treatment. J Bone Miner Res 23:1426-1434.
15. van Rietbergen B. 2001. Micro-FE analyses of bone: state of the art. Adv Exp Med Biol 496:21-30.
16. Newitt DC, van Rietbergen B, Majumdar S. 2002. Processing and analysis of in vivo high-resolution MR images of trabecular bone for longitudinal studies: reproducibility of structural measures and micro-finite element analysis derived mechanical properties. Osteoporos Int 13:278-287. (Pubitemid 34506736)
17. Alberich-Bayarri A, Moratal D, Marti-Bonmati L, et al. 2007. Volume mesh generation and finite element analysis of trabecular bone magnetic resonance images. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:1603-1606.
18. Ladd AJ, Kinney JH. 1998. Numerical errors and uncertainties in finite-element modeling of trabecular bone. J Biomech 31:941-945.
19. Majumdar S, Link TM, Augat P, et al. 1999. Trabecular bone architecture in the distal radius using magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with fractures of the proximal femur. Magnetic Resonance Science Center and Osteoporosis and Arthritis Research Group. Osteoporos Int 10:231-239.
20. Wehrli FW, Hwang SN, Ma J, et al. 1998. Cancellous bone volume and structure in the forearm: noninvasive assessment with MR microimaging and image processing. Radiology 206:347-357. (Pubitemid 28112947)
21. Boutroy S, Van Rietbergen B, Sornay-Rendu E, et al. 2008. Finite element analysis based on in vivo HR-pQCT images of the distal radius is associated with wrist fracture in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 23:392-399. (Pubitemid 351304669)
22. MacNeil JA, Boyd SK. 2007. Accuracy of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography for measurement of bone quality. Med Eng Phys 29:1096-1105. (Pubitemid 350052626)
23. Wehrli FW, Saha PK, Gomberg BR, et al. 2003. Noninvasive assessment of bone architecture by magnetic resonance microimaging- based virtual bone biopsy. Proc IEEE 91:1520-1542.
24. Feldkamp LA, Goldstein SA, Parfitt AM, et al. 1989. The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 4:3-11. (Pubitemid 19079118)
25. Chung HW, Wehrli FW, Williams JL, et al. 1995. Quantitative analysis of trabecular microstructure by 400 MHz nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Miner Res 10:803-811.
26. Jara H, Wehrli FW, Chung H, et al. 1993. High-resolution variable flip angle 3D MR imaging of trabecular microstructure in vivo. Mag Res Med 29:528-539. (Pubitemid 23112757)
27. Last D, Peyrin F, Guillot G. 2005. Accuracy of 3D MR microscopy for trabecular bone assessment: a comparative study on calcaneus samples using 3D synchrotron radiation microtomography. Magma 18:26-34.
28. Keaveny TM, Guo XE, Wachtel EF, et al. 1994. Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains. J Biomech 27:1127-1136. (Pubitemid 24211193)
29. Magland JF, Wald MJ, Lemdiasov R, et al. 2008. In Vivo Trabecular Bone Micro-Imaging at Isotropic Resolution Using 3D FLASE with Parallel Imaging at 3T. Proc Int Soc Mag Res Med. 16:2527.
30. Gudbjartsson H, Patz S. 1995. The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Mag Res Med 34:910-914.
31. Hwang SN, Wehrli FW. 2002. Subvoxel processing: a method for reducing partial volume blurring with application to in vivo MR images of trabecular bone. Mag Res Med 47:948-957.
32. van Rietbergen B, Odgaard A, Kabel J, et al. 1996. Direct mechanics assessment of elastic symmetries and properties of trabecular bone architecture. J Biomech 29:1653-1657. (Pubitemid 26381880)
33. Hollister SJ, Brennan JM, Kikuchi N. 1994. A homogenization sampling procedure for calculating trabecular bone effective stiffness and tissue level stress. J Biomech 27:433-444.
34. Rajapakse CS, Magland JF, Wehrli FW. 2008. Fast prospective registration of in vivo MR images of trabecular bone microstructure in longitudinal studies. Mag Res Med 59:1120-1126.
35. Chung H, Wehrli FW, Williams JL, et al. 1993. Relationship between NMR transverse relaxation, trabecular bone architecture, and strength. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:10250-10254. (Pubitemid 23328290)
36. Wehrli FW, Ladinsky GA, Jones C, et al. 2008. In vivo magnetic resonance detects rapid remodeling changes in the topology of the trabecular bone network after menopause and the protective effect of estradiol. J Bone Miner Res 23:730-740.
37. Hwang SN, Wehrli FW. 1999. Experimental evaluation of a surface charge method for computing the induced magnetic field in trabecular bone. J Mag Res 139:35-45.
38. Helgason B, Perilli E, Schileo E, et al. 2008. Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 23:135-146. (Pubitemid 351181239)
39. Hopkins JA, Wehrli FW. 1997. Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: magnetic susceptibility of bone. Mag Res Med 37:494-500.