Comparative analysis of logistic regression, support vector machine and artificial neural network for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid breast tumors by the use of three-dimensional power Doppler imaging

Korean Journal of Radiology

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 464-471

  Chen, Shou Tung ^a   Hsiao, Yi Hsuan ^a   Huang, Yu Len ^b   Kuo, Shou Jen ^a   Tseng, Hsin Shun ^a   Wu, Hwa Koon ^a   Chen, Dar Ren ^a  

^a CHANGHUA CHRISTIAN HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b TUNGHAI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Flow index; Logistic regression analysis; Neural network; Support Vector Machine; Vascularization index; Vascularization flow index

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLID TUMOR; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VASCULARIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 70349170224     PISSN: 12296929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2009.10.5.464     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS, Cha JH, Jang M, Seong MH. Nonpalpable breast masses: evaluation by US elastography. Korean J Radiol 2008;9:111-118
2. Chen DR, Chang RF, Chen WM, Moon WK. Computer-aided diagnosis for 3-dimensional breast ultrasonography. Arch Surg 2003;138:296-302
3. Kuo SJ, Hsiao YH, Huang YL, Chen DR. Classification of benign and malignant breast tumors using neural networks and three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:97-102
4. Rosen EL, Soo MS. Tissue harmonic imaging sonography of breast lesions: improved margin analysis, conspicuity, and image quality compared to conventional ultrasound. Clin Imaging 2001;25:379-384
5. Szopinski KT, Pajk AM, Wysocki M, Amy D, Szopinska M, Jakubowski W. Tissue harmonic imaging: utility in breast sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2003;22:479-487 (Pubitemid 36528750)
6. Seo BK, Oh YW, Kim HR, Kim HW, Kang CH, Lee NJ, et al. Sonographic evaluation of breast nodules: comparison of conventional, real-time compound, and pulse-inversion harmonic images. Korean J Radiol 2002;3:38-44
7. Hsiao YH, Kuo SJ, Liang WM, Huang YL, Chen DR. Intratumor flow index can predict the malignant potential of breast tumor: dependent on age and volume. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008;34:88-95
8. Chang RF, Huang SF, Moon WK, Lee YH, Chen DR. Solid breast masses: neural network analysis of vascular features at three-dimensional power Doppler US for benign or malignant classification. Radiology 2007;243:56-62
9. Chen DR, Chang RF, Huang YL. Computer-aided diagnosis applied to US of solid breast nodules by using neural networks. Radiology 1999;213:407-412
10. Chen DR, Chang RF, Huang YL, Chou YH, Tiu CM, Tsai PP. Texture analysis of breast tumors on sonograms. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000;21:308-316 (Pubitemid 30703986)
11. Chen DR, Chang RF, Kuo WJ, Chen MC, Huang YL. Diagnosis of breast tumors with sonographic texture analysis using wavelet transform and neural networks. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002;28:1301-1310
12. Seker H, Odetayo MO, Petrovic D, Naguib RN, Bartoli C, Alasio L, et al. Assessment of nodal involvement and survival analysis in breast cancer patients using image cytometric data: statistical, neural network and fuzzy approaches. Anticancer Res 2002;22:433-438 (Pubitemid 34475335)
13. Tourassi GD. Journey toward computer-aided diagnosis: role of image texture analysis. Radiology 1999;213:317-320
14. Joo S, Yang YS, Moon WK, Kim HC. Computer-aided diagnosis of solid breast nodules: use of an artificial neural network based on multiple sonographic features. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004;23:1292-1300 (Pubitemid 40036052)
15. Chen CM, Chou YH, Han KC, Hung GS, Tiu CM, Chiou HJ, et al. Breast lesions on sonograms: computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artificial neural networks. Radiology 2003;226:504-514
16. Chang RF, Wu WJ, Moon WK, Chou YH, Chen DR. Support vector machines for diagnosis of breast tumors on US images. Acad Radiol 2003;10:189-197 (Pubitemid 36150973)
17. Huang YL, Chen DR. Support vector machines in sonography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Clin Imaging 2005;29:179-184 (Pubitemid 40602801)
18. Zhang J, Wang Y, Dong Y, Wang Y. Ultrasonographic feature selection and pattern classification for cervical lymph nodes using support vector machines. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2007;88:75-84 (Pubitemid 47331954)
19. Jarvela IY, Sladkevicius P, Kelly S, Ojha K, Nargund G, Campbell S. Three-dimensional sonographic and power Doppler characterization of ovaries in late follicular phase. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20:281-285 (Pubitemid 35056659)
20. Chang CH, Yu CH, Ko HC, Chen CL, Chang FM. Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound for the assessment of the fetal brain blood flow in normal gestation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:1273-1279 (Pubitemid 37211327)
21. Alcazar JL. Tumor angiogenesis assessed by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in early, advanced and metastatic ovarian cancer: a preliminary study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:325-329
22. Chang RF, Wu WJ, Moon WK, Chen DR. Improvement in breast tumor discrimination by support vector machines and speckle-emphasis texture analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:679-686
23. Song JH, Venkatesh SS, Conant EA, Arger PH, Sehgal CM. Comparative analysis of logistic regression and artificial neural network for computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses. Acad Radiol 2005;12:487-495 (Pubitemid 40502907)