Genetic variation and clustering in Murraya paniculata complex as revealed by single primer amplification reaction methods

Current Science

Volumn 96, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1210-1216

  Verma, Sushma ^a   Rana, T S ^a   Ranade, S A ^a  

^a CSIR NATIONAL BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Clustering; Genetic variation; Murraya paniculata

Indexed keywords

GLYCOSMIS PENTAPHYLLA; MURRAYA; MURRAYA PANICULATA; RUTACEAE;

EID: 70349144829     PISSN: 00113891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Swingle, W. T. and Reece, P. C., The botany of Citrus and its wild relatives of the orange subfamily (family Rutaceae, subfamily Aurantioideae). In The Citrus Industry (eds Reuther, W. et al.), University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA, 1967, vol. 1, pp. 190-430.
2. Nair, K. N. and Nayar, M. P., Rutaceae. In The Flora of India (eds Hajra, P. K. et al.), Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta, 1997, vol. 4, pp. 259-408.
3. Ohri, D., Genome size variation in some tropical hardwoods. Biol. Plant., 2002, 45, 455-457.
4. Watt, G., Dictionary of Economic Products of India, Calcutta, 1889-93, vols 1-4.
5. Anon., Wealth of India: Raw Materials, CSIR, New Delhi, 1948-76, vols I and II.
6. Kirtikar, K. R. and Basu, B. D., Indian Medicinal Plants, Lalit Mohan Basu, Allahabad, 1935, vols 1-4.
7. Ambasta, S. P., The Useful Plants of India, Publications and Information Directorate, CSIR, New Delhi, 1986.
8. Stone, B. C., Rutaceae. In A Revised Handbook to the Flora of Ceylon (ed. Dassanayake, M. D.), 1985, vol. 5, pp. 176-406.
9. Hooker, J. D., The Flora of British India, London, 1875, vol. 1, pp. 522-503.
10. Huang, C., Preliminary study on Chinese Rutaceae III - Aurantiodeae Engl. Acta Phytotax. Sin., 1959, 8, 100.
11. Brophy, J. J., Foster, P. I. and Goldsack, R. J., Diversity in Australian populations of Murraya paniculata: new evidence from volatile leaf oils. Aust. Syst. Bot., 1994, 7, 409-418.
12. Mabberly, D. J., Australian Citreae with notes on other Aurantioideae (Rutaceae). Telopea, 1998, 7, 333-344.
13. Provost, A. and Wilkinson, M. J., A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet., 1999, 98, 107-112.
14. Heath, D. D., Iwana, G. K. and Delvin, R. H., PCR primed with VNTR core sequences yield species specific patterns and hypervariable probes. Nucleic Acids Res., 1993, 21, 5782-5785.
15. Williams, J. G., Kubelik, A. R., Livak, K. J., Rafaleski, J. A. and Tingey, S. V., DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res., 1990, 18, 6531-6535.
16. Tsumura, Y., Ohba, K. and Strauss, S. H., Diversity and inheritance of inter-simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in Douglasfir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugi (Cryptomeria japonica). Theor. Appl. Genet., 1997, 92, 40-45.
17. Nagaoka, T. and Ogihara, Y., Applicability of inter-simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in wheat for use as DNA markers in comparison to RFLP and RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet., 1997, 94, 597-602.
18. Fang, D. Q. and Roose, M. L., Identification of closely related citrus cultivars with inter-simple sequence repeat markers. Theor. Appl. Genet., 1997, 95, 408-417.
19. Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V. and Thein, S. L., Hypervariable (minisatellite) region in human DNA. Nature, 1985, 314, 67-73.
20. Welsh, J. and McClelland, M., Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res., 1990, 18, 7213-7218.
21. Doyle, J. J. and Doyle, J. L., Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 1990, 12, 13-15.
22. Zhou, Z., Bebeli, P. J., Somers, D. J. and Gustafson, J. P., Direct amplification of minisatellite-region DNA with VNTR core sequences in the genus Oryza. Theor. Appl. Genet., 1997, 95, 942-949.
23. Pavlicek, A., Hrda, S. and Flegr, J., FreeTree - Freeware program for construction of phylogenetic trees on the basis of distance data and bootstrapping/jackknife analysis of the tree robustness. Application in the RAPD analysis of the genus Frenkelia. Folia Biol. (Praha.), 1999, 45, 97-99.
24. Page, R. D. M., TreeView (Win32), ver. 1.6.5, 2001; http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/treeview.html
25. Nei, M., Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat., 1972, 106, 283-292.
26. Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W., The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1949.
27. Yeh, F. C., Yang, R. and Boyle, T., POPGENE - A Microsoft Windows-based freeware for population genetic analysis, ver. 1.32 (32 bit), 1997; http://.ualberta.ca/~feyeh/
28. Powell, W., Morgante, M., Andre, C., Hanafey, M., Vogel, J., Tingey, S. V. and Rafalski, A., The utility of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSRP (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol. Breed., 1996, 2, 225-238.
29. Ranade, S. A., Rana, T. S., Srivastava, A. P. and Nair, K. N., Molecular differentiation in Murraya Koenig ex L., species in India inferred through ITS, RAPD and DAMD analysis. Curr. Sci., 2006, 90, 1253-1258.
30. Metais, I., Aubry, C., Hamon, B., Jalouzot, R. and Peltier, D., Assessing common bean genetic diversity using RFLP, DAMD-PCR, ISSR, RAPD and AFLP markers. Acta Hortic., 2001, 546, 456-461.
31. Verma, A., Kumar, N. and Ranade, S. A., Genetic diversity amongst landraces of a dioecious vegetatively propagated plant, betelvine (Piper betle L.). J. Biosci., 2004, 29, 319-328.
32. Bhattacharya, E., Dandin, S. B. and Ranade, S. A., Single Primer Amplification Reaction methods reveal exotic and indigenous mulberry varieties are similarly diverse. J. Biosci., 2005, 30, 669-675.
33. Saxena, S., Chandra, R., Srivastava, A. P., Mishra, M., Pathak, R. K. and Ranade, S. A., Analysis of genetic diversity among papaya cultivars using Single Primer Amplification Reaction (SPAR) methods. J. Hortic. Sci. Biot., 2005, 80, 291-296.
34. Ranade, S. A., Srivastava, A. P., Rana, T. S., Srivastava, J. and Tuli, R., Easy assessment of diversity in Jatropha curcas L., plants using two single primer amplification reaction (SPAR) methods. Biomass. Bioeng., 2008, 32, 533-540.