Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation I: Comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses

Hearing Research

Volumn 215, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 10-21

  Cartee, Lianne A ^a   Miller, Charles A ^b   van den Honert, Chris ^c  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c Department of Otolaryngology   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory nerve; Cats; Cochlear implant; Electrical stimulation; Single fiber recording

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NERVE FIBER; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL FUNCTION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HYPOTHESIS; INTERNAL AUDITORY CANAL; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEASUREMENT; NERVE FIBER; NERVOUSNESS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; SPIRAL GANGLION;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CATS; CELL MEMBRANE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; SCALA TYMPANI; SPIRAL GANGLION;

EID: 33646249127     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adamo J.A., and Diagneault E.A. Ultrastructural features of neurons and nerve fibers of the spiral ganglion of cats. J. Neurocyt. 2 (1973) 91-103
2. Badi A., Hillman T., Shelton C., and Normann R. A technique for implantation of a 3-dimensional penetrating electrode array in the modiolar nerve of cats and humans. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 128 (2002) 1019-1025
3. Brownell W.E., Bader C.R., Bertrand D., and de Ribaupierre Y. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science 277 (1985) 194-196
4. Cartee L.A. Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane. II: Comparison of model and physiological measure of membrane properties measured in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation. Hear. Res. 146 (2000) 153-166
5. Cartee L.A., van den Honert C., Finley C.C., and Miller R.L. Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane. I: Physiological measurement of membrane characteristics in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation. Hear. Res. 146 (2000) 143-152
6. Cartee, L.A., 2006. Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation. II: Numerical model analysis. Hear. Res. in press, doi:10.1016/j.heares.2006.02.011.
7. Finley C.C., Wilson B.S., and White M.W. Models of neural responsiveness to electrical stimulation. In: Miller J.M., and Spelman F.A. (Eds). Cochlear Implants: Models of the Electrically Stimulated Ear (1990), Springer-Verlag, New York 55-96
8. Goycoolea M.V., Stypulkowski P., and Muchow D.C. Ultrastructural studies of the peripheral extensions (dendrites) of type I ganglion cells in the cat. Laryngology 100 (1990) 19-24
9. Hartmann R., Topp G., and Klinke R. Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear. Res. 13 (1984) 47-62
10. van den Honert C., and Stypulkowski P.H. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II: Single fiber recordings. Hear. Res. 14 (1984) 225-243
11. van den Honert C., and Stypulkowki P.H. Temporal response patterns of single auditory nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli. Hear. Res. 29 (1987) 207-222
12. Javel, and Shepherd. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III: Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure. Hear. Res. 140 (2000) 45-76
13. Javel E., Tong Y.C., Shepherd R.K., and Clark G.M. Responses of cat auditory nerve fibers to biphasic electrical current pulses. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 96 Suppl. 128 (1987) 26-30
14. Kiang N.Y.S., and Moxon E.C. Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 81 (1972) 714-730
15. Kiang N.Y.S., Rho J.M., Northrop C.C., Liberman M.C., and Ryugo D.K. Hair-cell innervation by spiral ganglion cells in adult cats. Science 217 9 (1982) 175-177
16. Kohllöffel L.U.E. A study of neurone activity in the spiral ganglion of the cat's basal turn. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 109 (1974) 179-202
17. Liberman M.C., and Oliver M.E. Morphometry of intracellularly labeled neurons of the auditory nerve: Correlations with functional properties. J. Comp. Neurol. 223 (1984) 163-176
18. Litvak L., Delgutte B., and Eddington D. Improved neural representation of vowels in electric stimulation using desynchronizing pulse trains. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114 (2003) 2099-2111
19. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., Robinson B.K., Rubinstein J.R., and Matsuoka A.J. Electrically evoked single-fiber action potentials from cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hear. Res. 130 (1999) 197-218
20. Miller C.A., Robinson B.K., Rubinstein J.T., Abbas P.J., and Runge Samuelson C. Auditory nerve responses to monophasic and biphasic electric stimuli. Hear. Res. 151 (2001) 79-94
21. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., Nourski K.V., Hu N., and Robinson B.K. Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties. Hear. Res. 175 (2003) 200-214
22. Miller, C.A., Nagase, S., Abbas, P.J., Hu, N., Robinson, B.K., 2003b. The effect of recording electrode position on the electrically evoked compound action potential. Abstract #765 presented at the 2003 Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
23. Mino H., Rubinstein J.T., Miller C.A., and Abbas P.J. Effects of electrode-to-fiber distance on temporal neural response with electrical stimulations. IEEE Trans. BME 51 (2004) 13-20
24. Moxon, E.C., 1965. Electrical stimulation of the cat's cochlea: A study of discharge rates in single auditory nerve fibers, Master's Thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
25. Moxon, E.C., 1971. Neural and mechanical responses to electric stimulation of the cat's inner ear, Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
26. Rattay F. Electrical Nerve Stimulation: Theory, Experiments and Applications (1990), Springer-Verlag, New York
27. Robertson D. Possible relation between structure and spike shapes of neurones in guinea pig cochlea ganglion. Brain Res. 109 (1976) 487-496
28. Rubinstein J.T., Wilson B.S., Finley C.C., and Abbas P.J. Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation. Hear. Res. 172 (1999) 108-118
29. Simmons B.F. Percepts from modiolar (eighth nerve) stimulation. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 405 (1983) 259-263
30. Spach M.S., and Kootsey J.M. Relating the sodium current and conductance to the shape of transmembrane and extracellular potential by stimulation: effects of propagation boundaries. IEEE Trans. BME BME-32 10 (1985) 743-755
31. Stypulkowski P.H., and van den Honert C. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. I: Compound action potential recordings. Hear. Res. 14 (1984) 205-223
32. Theodoridis S., and Koutroumbas K. Pattern Recognition. second ed . (2003), Academic Press, Elsevier Science, San Diego, CA
33. Verveen A.A. Axon diameter and fluctuation in excitability. Acta. Morphol. Neerlando-Scand. 5 (1962) 79-85
34. Zappia J.J., Hetke J.F., Altschuler R.A., and Niparko J.K. Evaluation of a silicon-substrate modiolar eighth nerve implant in a guinea pig. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 103 4 (1990) 575-582