Using mixed-method design and network analysis to measure development of interagency collaboration

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 310-329

  Cross, Jennifer Eileen ^a   Dickmann, Ellyn ^a   Newman Gonchar, Rebecca ^b   Fagan, Jesse Michael ^a  

^a Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability   (United States)

^b Instructional Research Group   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Community partnerships; Interagency coalitions; Mixed method; Network analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 70249128732     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: 15570878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1098214009340044     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bailey, D., & Koney, K. (2000). Strategic alliances among health and human services organizations, from affiliations to consolidations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2008). Pajek: Program for large network analysis (version 1.23). Retrieved May 3, 2008 from: http://pajek.imfm.si/doku.php?id=download
3. Berkowitz, B. (2001). Studying the outcomes of community-based coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 213-227.
4. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
5. Borgatti, S. (n.d.). Netdraw. Retrieved August 27, 2008 from Analytictech.com.
6. Borgotti, S., Everett, M., & Shirey, P. (1992). Ucinet iv, version 1.0 reference manual. Natick, MA: Columbia University Press/ Analytic Technologies.
7. Chavis, D. M. (1995). Building community capacity to prevent violence through coalitions and partnerships. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 6, 234-245.
8. Chrislip, D. D., & Larson, C. E. (1994). Collaborative leaderships: How citizens and civic leaders can make a difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Cross, J. E. (2003). Evaluation instruments that measure change, growth and collaboration. Paper presented at the Safe Schools/Healthy Students National Meeting.
10. Eisenberg, M., & Swanson, N. (1996). Organizational network analysis as a tool for program evaluation. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 19, 488-506.
11. El Ansari, W., & Weiss, E. S. (2006). Quality of research on community partnerships: Developing the evidence base. Health Education Research, 21, 175-180.
12. Fawcett, S. B., Sterling, T. D., Paine-Andrews, A., Harris, K. J., Francisco, V. T., Richter, K. P., et al. (1995). Evaluating community efforts to prevent cardiovascular diseases. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
13. Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2007). Community structure in graphs. eprint arXiv: 0712.2716.
14. Frank, K. A. (1995). Identifying cohesive subgroups. Social Networks, 17, 27-56.
15. Frank, K. A. (1996). Mapping interactions within and between cohesive subgroups. Social Networks, 18, 93-119.
16. Frank, K. A. (1998a). Chapter 5: Quantitative methods for studying social context in multilevels and through interpersonal relations. Review of Research in Education, 23, 171.
17. Frank, K. A. (1998b). Quantitative methods for studying social context in multilevels and through interpersonal relations. Review of Research in Education, 23, 171-216.
18. Frank, K. A. (n.d.). Kilquefinder. Retrieved May 1, 2009 from: http://pikachu.harvard.edu/wkf/
19. Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness. Sociometry, 40, 35-41.
20. Frey, B. B., Lohmeier, J. H., Lee, S. W., & Tollefson, N. (2006). Measuring collaboration among grant partners [Method notes]. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 383-392.
21. Fruchterman, T., & Reingold, E. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software-Practice and Experience, 21, 1129-1164.
22. Gajda, R. (2006). Safe schools through strategic alliances: How assessment of collaboration enhances school violence prevention and response. Journal of School Violence, 5, 63-80.
23. Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 7821.
24. Goodman, R. M., & Wandersman, A. (1994). Forecast-A formative approach to evaluating community coalitions and community-based initiatives. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 6-25.
25. Granner, M. L., & Sharpe, P. A. (2004). Evaluating community coalition characteristics and functioning: A summary of measurement tools. Health Education Research, 19, 514-532.
26. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
27. Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Retrieved October 1, 2007 from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/
28. Hinckley, B. (1981). Coalitions and politics. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.
29. Hogue, T. (1993). Community-based collaboration: Community wellness multiplied. Retrieved July 10, 2006 from http://crs.uvm.edu/nnco/collab/wellness.html
30. Hogue, T., Perkins, D. F., Clark, R., Bergstrum, A., Slinski, M., & Associates. (1995). Collaboration framework: Addressing community capacity. Columbus, OH: National Network for Collaboration.
31. Kadushin, C., Lindholm, M., Ryan, D., Brodsky, A., & Saxe, L. (2005). Why it is so difficult to form effective community coalitions. City & Community, 4, 255-275.
32. Kreuter, M. W., Lezin, N. A., & Young, L. A. (2000). Evaluating community-based collaborative mechanisms: Implications for practitioners. Health Promotion Practice, 1, 49-63.
33. Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63, 482-501.
34. McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14, 91.
35. Newman, M. (2003). Mixing patterns in networks. Physical Review E, 67, 026126.
36. Newman, M. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 8577.
37. Newman, M., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69, 26113-26128.
38. OMNI Institute (n.d.). Working together: A profile of collaboration. Retrieved from http://www.omni.org/docs/WTS.pdf Access date: June 5, 2006.
39. Open-Source. (2008). Inkscape (version 0.46).
40. Osher, D., Dwyer, K., & Jackson, S. (2003). Safe, supportive, and successful schools step by step. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
41. Peterson, N. L. (1991). Interagency collaboration under Part H: The key to comprehensive multidisciplinary, coordinated infant/toddler intervention services. Journal of Early Intervention, 15, 89-105.
42. Plested, B. A., Thurman, P. J., Edwards, R. W., & Oetting, E. R. (1998). Community readiness: A tool for effective community-based prevention. The Prevention Researcher, 5, 5-7.
43. Provan, K. G., Veazie, M. A., Staten, L. K., & Teufel-Shone, N. I. (2005). The use of network analysis to strengthen community partnerships. Public Administration Review, 65, 603-612.
44. Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240-267.
45. Riker, W. (1962). The theory of political coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46. Spillane, J. P. (1998). State policy and the non-monolithic nature of the local school district: Organizational and professional considerations. American Education Research Journal, 35, 33-63.
47. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2005). Safe schools/healthy students initiative program announcement. Retrieved November 1, 2005, from http://sshs.samhsa.gov/media/sshs/applications/SSHS2005App.pdf
48. Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (2003). Community intervention and effective presentation. American Psychologist, 58, 441-448.
49. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature (London), 393, 440-442.
51. Zachary, W. W. (1977). An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups. Journal of Anthropological Research, 33, 452-473.