Secondary intervention after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 250, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 383-389

  Conrad, Mark F ^a   Adams, Andrew B ^a   Guest, Julie M ^a   Paruchuri, Vikram ^a   Brewster, David C ^a   Lamuraglia, Glenn M ^a   Cambria, Richard P ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ANEURYSM RUPTURE; ANEURYSM SURGERY; ARTICLE; COIL EMBOLIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; GENDER; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT MIGRATION; HUMAN; INFERIOR MESENTERIC ARTERY; INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENOSIS; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RECURRENCE; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70249125129     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b365bd     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Brewster DC, Jones JE, Chung TK, et al. Long-term outcomes after endo-vascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the first decade. Ann Surg. 2006;244:426-438.
2. Moore WS, Brewster DC, Bernhard VM. Aorto-uni-iliac endograft for complex aortoiliac aneurysms compared with tube/bifurcation endografts: results of the EVT/Guidant trials. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33(suppl):S11-S20.
3. Zarins CK, White RA, Schwarten D, et al. AneuRx stent graft versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: multicenter prospective clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29:292-305; discussion 306-308.
4. Greenberg RK, Chuter TA, Sternbergh WC III, et al. Zenith AAA endovas-cular graft: intermediate-term results of the US multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:1209-1218.
5. Matsumura JS, Brewster DC, Makaroun MS, et al. A multicenter controlled clinical trial of open versus endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:262-271.
6. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 365:2179-2186.
7. Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SE, Prinssen M, et al. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2398-2405.
8. Laheij RJ, Buth J, Harris PL, et al. Need for secondary interventions after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Intermediate-term follow-up results of a European collaborative registry (EUROSTAR). Br J Surg. 2000;87:1666-1673.
9. Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1607-1618.
10. Higashiura W, Sakaguchi S, Kichikawa K, et al. Midterm outcomes of endovascular repair with the zenith endovascular graft: does the ipsilateral limb level of the main body of the graft affect outcome? J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:848-854.
11. Ohki T, Veith FJ, Shaw P, et al. Increasing incidence of midterm and long-term complications after endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a note of caution based on a 9-year experience. Ann Surg. 2001, 234:323-334; discussion 334-335.
12. Jones JE, Atkins MD, Brewster DC, et al. Persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with adverse late outcomes. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:1-8.
13. Lovegrove RE, Javid M, Magee TR, et al. A meta-analysis of 21,178 patients undergoing open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2008;95:677-684
14. Boult M, Babidge W, Maddern G, et al. Predictors of success following endovascular aneurysm repair: mid-term results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;31:123-129.
15. Verhoeven EL, Tielliu IF, Prins TR, et al. Frequency and outcome of re-interventions after endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28:357-364.
16. van Marrewijk C, Buth J, Harris PL, et al. Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:461-473. (Pubitemid 46098519)
17. Silverberg D, Baril DT, Ellozy SH, et al. An 8-year experience with type II endoleaks: natural history suggests selective intervention is a safe approach. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:453-459.
18. van Marrewijk CJ, Fransen G, Laheij RJ, et al. Is a type II endoleak after EVAR a harbinger of risk? Causes and outcome of open conversion and aneurysm rupture during follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27: 128-137.
19. Becker GJ, Kovacs M, Mathison MN, et al. Risk stratification and outcomes of transluminal endografting for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 7-year experience and long-term follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:1033-1046.
20. Nevala T, Biancari F, Manninen H, et al. Finnish multicenter study on the midterm results of use of the Zenith stent-graft in the treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:448-454.
21. Dias NV, Riva L, Ivancev K, et al. Is there a benefit of frequent CT follow-up after EVAR? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:425-430.
22. Go MR, Barbato JE, Rhee RY, et al. What is the clinical utility of a 6-month computed tomography in the follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair patients? J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:1181-1186; discussion 1186-1187.
23. Sternbergh WC III, Greenberg RK, Chuter TA, et al. Redefining postoperative surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair: recommendations based on 5-year follow-up in the US Zenith multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 48:278-284; discussion 284-285.
24. England A, Butterfield JS, Jones N, et al. Device migration after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: experience with a talent stent-graft. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:1399-1405.
25. Heikkinen MA, Alsac JM, Arko FR, et al. The importance of iliac fixation in prevention of stent graft migration. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:1130-1137; discussion 1137.
26. Litwinski RA, Donayre CE, Chow SL, et al. The role of aortic neck dilation and elongation in the etiology of stent graft migration after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with a passive fixation device. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:1176-1181.
27. Abbruzzese TA, Kwolek CJ, Brewster DC, et al. Outcomes following endo-vascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): an anatomic and device-specific analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:19-28.
28. Dias NV, Ivancev K, Malina M, et al. Intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair: differences between shrinking, unchanged, and expanding aneurysms with and without endoleaks. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:1229-1235.
29. Gawenda M, Heckenkamp J, Zaehringer M, et al. Intra-aneurysm sac pres-sure-the holy grail of endoluminal grafting of AAA. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;24:139-145.
30. Hinnen JW, Koning OH, van Bockel JH, et al. Aneurysm sac pressure after EVAR: the role of endoleak. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;34:432-441; discussion 442-443.
31. Lin PH, Bush RL, Katzman JB, et al. Delayed aortic aneurysm enlargement due to endotension after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:840-842.
32. Risberg B, Delle M, Lonn L, et al. Management of aneurysm sac hygroma. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:191-195.
33. Kougias P, Lin PH, Dardik A, et al. Successful treatment of endotension and aneurysm sac enlargement with endovascular stent graft reinforcement. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:124-127.
34. Mennander A, Pimenoff G, Heikkinen M, et al. Nonoperative approach to endotension. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:194-199.
35. Rosen RJ, Green RM. Endoleak management following endovascular aneu-rysm repair. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19(suppl):S37-S43.
36. Higashiura W, Greenberg RK, Katz E, et al. Predictive factors, morphologic effects, and proposed treatment paradigm for type II endoleaks after repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;18:975-981.
37. Gould DA, McWilliams R, Edwards RD, et al. Aortic side branch emboli-zation before endovascular aneurysm repair: incidence of type II endoleak. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:337-341.
38. Axelrod DJ, Lookstein RA, Guller J, et al. Inferior mesenteric artery embo-lization before endovascular aneurysm repair: technique and initial results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:1263-1267.
39. Martin ML, Dolmatch BL, Fry PD, et al. Treatment of type II endoleaks with Onyx. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:629-632.
40. Rial R, Serrano Fj F, Vega M, et al. Treatment of type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: translumbar puncture and injection of thrombin into the aneurysm sac. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:333-335.
41. Cochennec F, Becquemin JP, Desgranges P, et al. Limb graft occlusion following EVAR: clinical pattern, outcomes and predictive factors of occurrence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;34:59-65.
42. Fransen GA, Vallabhaneni SR Sr, van Marrewijk CJ, et al. Rupture of infra-renal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair: a series from EUROSTAR registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;26:487-493.
43. Schlosser FJ, Gusberg RJ, Dardik A, et al. Aneurysm rupture after EVAR: can the ultimate failure be predicted? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37: 15-22.
44. Coppi G, Gennai S, Saitta G, et al. Treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular abdominal aortic repair: a comparison with patients without prior treatment. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:582-588.
45. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5:491-499.