Toward an UML-based composition of Grid services workflows

Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive Services, ICPS 2008 2nd International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Software

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 21-27

  Hlaoui, Yousra BenDaly ^a   BenAyed, Leila Jemni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TUNIS   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

Grid services; MDA approach; UML activity diagram; Workflow composition; Workflow model

Indexed keywords

GRID SERVICES; MDA APPROACH; UML ACTIVITY DIAGRAM; WORKFLOW COMPOSITION; WORKFLOW MODEL;

ABSTRACTING; GRID COMPUTING; MANAGEMENT; QUERY LANGUAGES; SEMANTICS; SOFTWARE AGENTS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

EID: 70249112221     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1387249.1387253     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. E. Sirin, J. Hendler, and B. Parsia. Semi automatic composition of web services using semantic descriptions. In proceedings of the IGEIS-2003 Workshop on Web Services: Modeling, Architecture and, Infrastructure, Angers, France,. April 2003.
2. J. Rao, P. Kungas, and M. Matskin. Logic-based web service composition: from service description to process model. In proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Web Services, ICWS 2004, San Diego, California, USA, July 6-9 2004.
3. T. Gubala, D. Herezlak, M. Bubak, M. Malawski. Semantic Composition of Scientific Workflows Based on the Petri Nets Formalism. In Proc. Of the Second IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing (e-Science'06). 2006.
4. W. Li, C. Huang, Q. Chen, H. Bian. A Model-Driven Aspect Framework for Grid Service Development. Proc. Of IEEE Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications and International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services (AICT/ICIW). 2006, pp 139-146.
5. R. Gronomo, I. Solheim. Towards Modelling Web Service Composition in UML. In The 2nd, International Workshop on Web Services: Modelling, Architecture and Infrastructure. Porto, Portugal. 2004
6. R. Gronomo, MC. Jaeger. Model Driven Semantic Web Service Composition. In Proc. of the 12th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference(APSEC'05).2005.
7. D. Skogan, R. Gronomo, I. Solheim. Web Service Composition in UML. In Proc. of the 8th Intl Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference(EDOC'04).2004.
8. M. Smith, T. Friese, Freisleben, B.: Model Driven Development of Service-Oriented Grid Applications. Proc. of IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Services Computing(APSCC'06). (2006)
9. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. The OWL Services Coalition. OWL-S version 2.0. http://www.daml.org/services/oml-s/1.0/owl-s.html
10. Pllana, S., Fahringer, T., Testori, J., Benkner, S., Brandic, I.: Towards an UML Based Graphical Representation of Grid Workflow Application. In The 2nd Eu-ropean Across Grids Conference, Nicosia, Cyprus, (2004). Springer-Verlag.
11. Gronomo, R., Solheim, I.: Towards Modeling Web Service Composition in UML. In The 2nd International Workshop on Web Services: Modeling, Architecture and Infrastructure, Porto, ortugal. (2004)
12. Guballa, R., Hoheisel, A., First, F.: Highly Dynamic workflow Orchestration for scientific Applications. CoreGRID Technical Report, Number TR-0101. (2007)
13. Bubak, M., Guballa, R., Kapalka, M., Malawski, M., Rycerz, K.: Workflow Composer and service registry for grid applications. Future generation Computer Systems 21, pp 79-86. (2005)
14. Model Driven Architecture (MDA). document nomber omrsc/2001-07-01. (2001)
15. Web Services Descriptio Language (WSDL) 1.1. W3C Note 15 March 2001.
16. I. Foster, C. Kesselman. Grid Services for Distributed System Integration. IEEE Computer, vol. 35, No. 6. (2004) 37-46.
17. Object Management Group. UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification. July (2005).
18. I. Foster, D. Berry, A. Djaoui, A. Grimshaw, B. Horn, H. Kishimoto, F. Maciel, A. Savy, F. Siebenlist, R. Subramaniam, J. Treadwell, J. Von Reich. The Open Grid Services Architecture, Version 1.0. pp-1U 19. 2004.
19. A. Seaborne. Rdql-a query language for rdf. Technical report, Hewlett-Packard through W3C Consortium. 2004.
20. Y. BenDaly Hlaoui, L. Jemni BenAyed. Toward a grid workflow formal composition. Proceedings of the third conference of the EELA project, CIEMAT. 2007.
21. T. Gardner. UML modelling of automated Business Processes with a Mapping to BPEL4WS. 17th European Conference on Object Oriented Programming (ECOOP). 2003.
22. M.J. Young. XML Step by Step. Microsoft Press. ISBN: 2-84082-812-X. 2001.
23. A. Dumas, A. H. M. Hofstede. UML Activity Diagrams as a Workflow Specification Language. Presented at UML 2001. 2001.
24. R. Eshuis, Semantics and verification of UML Activity Diagrams for Workflows Modelling. PhD thesis, University of Twente. 2002.
25. R. Eshuis and R. Wieringa. Comparing Petri net and Activity diagram variants for workflow modelling: A Quest for Reactive Petri Nets, Petri Net technology for communication based Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag", 2003.
26. M. Dumas, and A. H. M. ter Hofsetde. UML Activity Diagrams as a Workflow Specification Language. In UML'2001 Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, October 1-5, 2001.
27. R. Bastos, D. Dubugras, and A. Ruiz. Extending UML Activity Diagram for Workflow modelling in Productions Systems, In 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'02), Big Island, Hawaii, IEEE Cs Press, Los Alamitos, CA, IUSA, Januray 07-10, 2002.
28. C. Goble, D. de Roure. The grid: an application of the semantic web. ACM SIGMOD Record-Special section on semantic web and data management, 31(4):65-70. 2002.
29. M. Laclavik, E. Gatial, Z. Balogh, O. Habala, G. Nguyen, L. Hluchy. Experience Management Based on Text Notes (embet). In Proc. of eChallenges 2005 Conf., 2005
30. M. Masetti, S. Bianchi, G. Viano. Application of K-Wf Grid technology to Coordinated Traffic Management. http://grid02.softeco.it/site/project-info.html