Workflow composer and service registry for grid applications

Future Generation Computer Systems

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 79-86

  Bubak, Marian ^a,b   Gubała, Tomasz ^c   Kapałka, Michal ^a   Malawski, Maciej ^a   Rycerz, Katarzyna ^a  

^a AGH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b Academic Computer Centre   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Distributed registry; Grid programming; Grid workflow; Ontologies; Workflow composition

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT; GRAPH THEORY; SEMANTICS; STANDARDIZATION; SYNTACTICS;

DISTRIBUTED REGISTRY; GRID PROGRAMMING; GRID WORKFLOWS; WORKFLOW COMPOSITION;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 10444242673     PISSN: 0167739X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2004.09.021     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. G. Alonso, F. Casati, H. Kuno, V. Machiraju, Web Services, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004.
2. D. de Roure, N.R. Jennings, N. Shadbolt, The semantic grid: a future e-science infrastructure, Grid Computing - Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality, Wiley, 2003, pp. 437-470.
3. T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, O. Lassila, The semantic web, Sci. Am. 284 (5) (2001) 34-43.
4. myGrid and the drug discovery process, Drug Discovery Today: BIOSILICO 2 (4) (2004) 140-148.
5. H. Zhuge, Semantics, Resource and Grid, Elsevier FGCS 20 (1) (2004) 1-5.
6. B. Chandrasekaran, R. Jorn, V. Josephson, R. Benjamins, What are ontologies, and why do we need them? IEEE Intell. Syst. 14 (1) (1999) 20-26.
7. K. Sycara, M. Paolucci, A. Ankolekar, N. Srinivasan, Automated discovery, interaction and composition of semantic web services, J. Web Semantics 1 (1) (2003) 27-46.
8. M. Bubak, K. Górka, T. Gubała, M. Malawski, K. Zaja̧c, Component-based system for grid application workflow composition, in: Proceedings of the 10th European PVM/MPI Users' Group Meeting, Springer LNCS 2840, 2003, pp. 611-618.
9. M. Bubak, T. Gubała, M. Kapałka, M. Malawski, K. Rycerz, Grid service registry for workflow composition framework, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science - ICCS 2004, Springer LNCS 3038, 2004, pp. 34-41.
10. A. Ankolekar, et al., DAML-S: semantic markup for web services, in: Proceedings of the First International Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS), Stanford University, 2001, pp. 411-430.
11. S. McIlraith, T.C. Son, Adapting ConGolog for programming the semantic web, in: Working Notes of the Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Logical Formalization of Commonsense Reasoning, 2001, pp. 195-202.
12. D. McDermott, Estimated-regression planning for interactions with web services, in: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems, AAAI, 2002, pp. 204-211.
13. J. Peer, A PDDL based tool for automatic web service composition, in: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning (PPSWR 2004) at the 20th International Conference on Logic Programming, 2004.
14. Web-Ontology Working Group, OWL Web Ontology Language, W3C Recommendation Documents Set, February 10, 2004.
15. K. Czajkowski, D.F. Ferguson, I. Foster, J. Frey, S. Graham, I. Sedukhin, D. Snelling, S. Tuecke, W. Vambenepe, The WS-Resource Framework 1.0, May 2004.
16. A. Slominski, G. von Laszewski, Scientific Workflows Survey. http://www.extreme.indiana.edu/swf-survey/.
17. J. Kim, M. Spraragen, Y. Gil, An intelligent assistant for interactive workflow composition. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, ACM Press, 2004, pp. 125-131.
18. U. Kuter, E. Sirin, D. Nau, B. Parsia, J. Hendler, Information gathering during planning for web service composition, in: Proceedings of the Third International Semantic Web Conference 2004. Hiroshima, Japan. Springer, LNCS (to appear).