UML activity diagrams as a workflow specification language

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2185, Issue , 2001, Pages 76-90

  Dumas, Marlon ^a   Ter Hofstede, Arthur H M ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAPHIC METHODS; SEMANTICS; SPECIFICATION LANGUAGES; SPECIFICATIONS; WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

ACTIVITY DIAGRAM; ORGANISATIONAL; PROCESS MODELING; RELATIVE STRENGTH; UML ACTIVITY DIAGRAMS; WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; WORKFLOW PATTERNS; WORKFLOW SPECIFICATION;

UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

EID: 84948980573     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45441-1_7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. J.Ø. Aagedal and Z. Milosevic. ODP enterprise language: An UML perspective. In Proc. of The 3rd International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, Mannheim, Germany, 1999. IEEE Press
2. W.M.P. van der Aalst. The application of Petri nets to workflow management. The Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers, 8(1):21-66, 1998
3. W.M.P. van der Aalst, A.P. Barros, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and B. Kiepuszewski. Advanced workflow patterns. In Proc. of the 5th IFCIS Int. Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, Eilat, Israel, September 2000. Springer Verlag
4. W.M.P. van der Aalst, A.H.M ter Hofstede, B. Kiepuszewski, and A. Barros. Workflow patterns. Technical Report WP 47, BETA Research Institute, 2000. Accessed March 2001 from http://tmitwww.tm.tue.nl/research/patterns
5. E. Börger, A. Cavarra, and E. Riccobene. An ASM semantics for UML activity diagrams. In Proc. of the International Conference on Algebraic Methodologyand Software Technology(AMAST), Iowa City, IO, USA, May 2000. Springer Verlag
6. F. Casati, S. Ceri, B. Pernici, and G. Pozzi. Conceptual modeling of workflows. In Proc. of the 14th International Object-Oriented and Entity-Relationship Modelling Conference (OOER’95), pages 341-354. Springer Verlag, December 1995
7. R. Eshuis and R. Wieringa. A formal semantics for UML activity diagrams-Formalising workflow models. Technical Report CTIT-01-04, University of Twente, Department of Computer Science, 2001
8. M. Fowler and K. Scott. UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language (Second Edition). Addison Wesley, Readings MA, USA, 2000
9. D. Harel and A. Naamad. The statemate semantics of statecharts. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 5(4):293-333, October 1996
10. B. Kiepuszewski, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and C. Bussler. On structured workflow modelling. In Proc. of the Int. Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), Stockholm, Sweden, June 2000. Springer Verlag
11. F. Leymann and D. Roller. Production Workflow: Concepts and Techniques. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2000
12. P. Muth, D. Wodtke, J. Weissenfels, A.K. Dittrich, and G. Weikum. From centralized workflow specification to distributed workflow execution. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 10(2), March 1998
13. The precise UML group. Home page. http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/puml/
14. UML Revision Task Force. OMG Unified Modeling Language Specification, Version 1.4 (final draft). February 2001
15. J. Rumbaugh, I. Jacobson, and G. Booch. The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, 1999
16. M. Schader and A. Korthaus. Modeling business processes as part of the BOOSTER approach to business object-oriented systems development based on UML. In Proc. of The Second International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOC). IEEE Press, 1998
17. The Object Management Group. UML Extensions for Workflow Process Definition, RFP-bom/2000-12-11. Accessed on June 2001 from ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/docs/bom/00-12-11.pdf
18. The Workflow Management Coalition. The Workflow Reference Model. http://www.aiim.org/wfmc/standards/docs/tc003v11.pdf, accessed on January 2001