The benefits of implanted glucose sensors

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 1, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 797-800

  Klonoff, David C ^a  

^a Mills Peninsula Health Services   (United States)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Glucose implanted monitor; Nanotechnology; Sensor

Indexed keywords

EID: 70149104907     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/193229680700100601     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. Palerm CC, Bequette WB. Hypoglycemia detection and prediction using continuous glucose monitoring-a study on hypoglycemic clamp data. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007;1(5):624-9.
2. Klonoff DC. Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1231-9.
3. Klonoff DC. Subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring in severe burn patients. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1445.
4. Monnier L, Mas E, Ginet C, Michel F, Villon L, Cristol JP, Colette C. Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2006;295:1681-7.
5. Weinzimer SA, Beck RW, Chase HP, Fox LA, Buckingham BA, Tamborlane WV, Kollman C, Coffey J, Xing D, Ruedy KJ; Diabetes Research in Children Network Study Group. Accuracy of newergeneration home blood glucose meters in a Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) inpatient exercise study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005;7:675-80.
6. Klueh U, Liu Z, Ouyang T, Cho B, Feldman B, Henning TP, Kreutzer D. Blood-induced interference of glucose sensor function in vitro: implications for in vivo sensor function. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007;1(6):842-849.