Evaluation of guide wire cannulation technique in elderly patients with choledocholithiasis

Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 185-188

  Kouklakis, George ^a   Gatopoulou, Anthia ^a   Lirantzopoulos, Nikolaos ^a   Efraimidou, Eleni ^a   Manolas, Konstantinos ^a  

^a DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Elderly; ERCP; Guide wire cannulation; Post ERCP pancreatitis

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANNULATION; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELDERLY CARE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; FEMALE; GUIDE WIRE; GUIDE WIRE CANNULATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREATITIS; PERFORATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; AGE; CATHETERIZATION; EVALUATION; INCIDENCE; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATHETERIZATION; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; PANCREATITIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70149088864     PISSN: 18418724     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bailey AA, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, et al. A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: Effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 296-301.
2. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications in endoscopic biliary sphinterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335: 909-918.
3. Christoforidis E, Goulimaris I, Kanellos I, Tsalis K, Demetriades C, Betsis D. Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia: patient-related and operative risk factors. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 286-292. (Pubitemid 34279516)
4. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 425-434. (Pubitemid 33661145)
5. Mallery JS, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, et al. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 633-638.
6. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1781-1788. (Pubitemid 47206695)
7. Chong VH, Yim HB, Lim CC. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: outcomes, safety and complications. Singapore Med J 2005; 46: 621-626. (Pubitemid 41565214)
8. Lella F, Bagnolo F, Colombo E, Bonassi U. A simple way of avoiding post- ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 830-834. (Pubitemid 38879310)
9. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointestinal Endosc 1991; 37: 383-393.
10. Freeman ML. Toward improving outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 96-102.
11. Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J, et al. A comparative study of the standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire in the selective cannulation of the common bile duct. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 302-307.
12. Michopoulos S, Stamatis G, Mantos J, et al. Randomized trial comparing the tip of the hydrophilic guide wire for successful deep cannulation of the common bile duct. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: AB213
13. Karamanolis G, Katsikani A, Viazis N, et al. A prospective cross-over study using a sphincerotome and a guidewire to increase the success rate of common bile duct cannulation. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 1649-1652. (Pubitemid 40520806)
14. Thomopoulos KC, Vagenas K, Assimakopoulos SF, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is safe and effective method for diagnosis and treatment of biliary and pancreatic disorders in octogenarians. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2007; 70: 199-202. (Pubitemid 47066272)
15. Fritz E, Kirchgatterer A, Hubner D, et al. ERCP is safe and effective in patients 80 years of age and older compared with younger patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 899-905. (Pubitemid 44820066)
16. Huguet JM, Sempere J, Bort I, et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopacreatography in patients aged more than 90 years old. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 28: 263-266. (Pubitemid 40676966)
17. Koklu S, Parlak E, Yuksel O, Satin B. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopacreatography in the elderly: a prospective and comparative study. Age Ageing 2005; 34: 572-577. (Pubitemid 41699999)
18. Lazaraki G, Katsinelos P. Prevention of post- ERCP pancreatitis: an overview. Ann Gastroenterol 2008; 21: 27-38.