Rehabilitation after hallux valgus surgery: Importance of physical therapy to restore weight bearing of the first ray during the stance phase

Physical Therapy

Volumn 89, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 934-945

  Schuh, Reinhard ^a   Hofstaetter, Stefan G ^b   Adams jr, Samuel B ^c   Pichler, Florian ^a   Kristen, Karl Heinz ^a   Trnka, Hans Joerg ^a  

^a Foot and Ankle Center Vienna   (Austria)

^b Klinikum Wels Grieskirchen GmbH   (Austria)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRIA; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; GAIT; HALLUX VALGUS; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MALE; METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOTOMY; PHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESISTANCE TRAINING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTILIZATION REVIEW; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; AGED; AUSTRIA; FEMALE; GAIT; HALLUX VALGUS; HUMANS; MALE; METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOTOMY; PHYSICAL THERAPY (SPECIALTY); PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RESISTANCE TRAINING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT-BEARING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70149088430     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: 15386724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20080375     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Easley ME, Trnka HJ. Current concept review: hallux valgus, part II: operative treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;29:748-758.
2. Robinson AH, Limbers JP. Modern concepts in the treatment of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1038-1045.
3. Coughlin MJ. Instructional course lectures, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:932-966.
4. Sammarco VAJ. Stability and fixation techniques in first metatarsal osteotomies. Foot Ankle Clin. 2001;6:409-432.
5. Barouk LS. Scarf osteotomy of the first metatarsal in the treatment of hallux valgus. Foot Disease. 1995;2:35-48.
6. Buchner M, Schulze A, Zeitang F, Sabo D. Pressure distribution after scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus surgery [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2005;143:233-239.
7. Dereymaeker G. Scarf osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus: surgical technique and results as compared to distal chevron osteotomy. Foot Ankle Clin. 2000;5:513-524.
8. Jones S, Al Hussainy HA, Ali F, et al. Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus: a prospective clinical and pedobarographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:830-836.
9. Kristen KH, Berger C, Stelzig S, et al. The SCARF osteotomy for the correction of hallux valgus deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:221-219.
10. Perugia D, Basile A, Gensini A, et al. The scarf osteotomy for severe hallux valgus. Int Orthop. 2003;27:103-106.
11. Trnka HJ, Zembsch A, Easley ME, et al. The chevron osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus: comparison of findings after two and five years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1373-1378.
12. Trnka HJ, Zembsch A, Wiesauer H, et al. Modified Austin procedure for correction of hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18: 119-127.
13. Bryant AR, Tinley P, Cole JH. Plantar pressure and radiographic changes to the forefoot after the Austin bunionectomy. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:357-365.
14. Dhanendran M, Pollard JP, Hutton WC. Mechanics of the hallux valgus foot and the effect of Keller's operation. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980;51:1007-1012.
15. Dhukaram V, Hullin MG, Senthil Kumar C. The Mitchell and Scarf osteotomies for hallux valgus correction: a retrospective, comparative analysis using plantar pressures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006;45:400-409.
16. Kernozek TW, Roehrs T, McGarvey S. Analysis of plantar loading parameters pre and post surgical intervention for hallux vargus. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1997;12:S18-S19.
17. Kernozek TW, Sterriker SA. Chevron (Austin) distal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus: comparison of pre-and postsurgical characteristics. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:503-508.
18. Güsgen C, Walther M, Wölfel R, Vispo-Seara JL. The distal chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus: a medium-term retrospective clinical, radiographic and pedobarographic analysis [in German]. Fu_Sprung. 2005;3:164-171.
19. Jacob HAC. Forces acting in the forefoot during normal gait: an estimate. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001;16:783-792.
20. Rodgers MM. Dynamic biomechanics of the normal foot and ankle during walking and running. Phys Ther. 1988;68:1822-1830.
21. Myerson MS. The etiology and pathogenesis of hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Clin. 1997;2:583-598.
22. Mitternacht J, Lampe R. Calculation of functional kinetic parameters from the plantar pressure distribution measurement [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2006;144:410-418.
23. Grieve DW, Rashdi T. Pressures under normal feet in standing and walking as measured by foil pedobarography. Ann Rheum Dis. 1984;43:816-818.
24. Hutton WC, Dhanendran M. The mechanics of normal and hallux valgus feet: a quantitative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;(157):7-13.
25. Sanders M. Conservative treatment and shoewear options for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Clin. 1997;4:639-649.
26. Henry AP, Waugh W, Wood H. The use of footprints in assessing the results of operations for hallux valgus: a comparison of Keller's operation and arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975;57:478-481.
27. Stokes IA, Hutton WC, Stott JR, Lowe LW. Forces under the hallux valgus foot before and after surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;(142):64-72.
28. Waldecker U. Metatarsalgia in hallux valgus deformity: a pedographic analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2002;41:300-308.
29. Malone TB, Blackburn TA, Wallace LA. Knee rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 1980;60: 1602-1610.
30. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC. The science of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (402):9-20.
31. Chen B, Zimmerman JR, Soulen L, DeLisa JA. Continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79:421-426.
32. Hodgson S. Proximal humerus fracture rehabilitation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 442:131-138.
33. Theiler R, Schmid C, Risler R, Moser L. Postoperative physiotherapy in acute care: when, what and how much [in German]? Orthopade. 2007;36:552, 554-559.
34. Shaffer MA, Okereke E, Esterhai JL Jr, et al. Effects of immobilization on plantarflexion torque, fatigue resistance, and functional ability following an ankle fracture. Phys Ther. 2000;80:769-780.
35. Shamus J, Shamus E, Gugel RN, et al. The effects of sesamoid mobilization, flexor hallucis strengthening, and gait training on reducing pain and restoring function in individuals with hallux limitus: a clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;80: 769-780.
36. Austin DW, Leventen EO. A new osteotomy for hallux valgus: a horizontally directed "V" displacement osteotomy of the metatarsal head for hallux valgus and primus varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981; (157):25-30.
37. Barouk LS. Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: local anatomy, surgical technique, and combination with other forefoot procedures. Foot Ankle Clin. 2000;5:525-558.
38. Jarde O, Trinquier-Lautard JL, Gabrion A, et al. Hallux valgus treated by Scarf osteotomy of the first metatarsus and the first phalanx associated with an adductor plasty: apropos of 50 cases with a 2-year follow up [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1999;85:374-380.
39. Smith RW, Reynolds JC, Stewart MJ. Hallux valgus assessment: report of research committee of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Foot Ankle. 1984;5: 92-103.
40. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, et al. Clinical rating systems for the anklehindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:349-353.
41. Hughes J, Pratt L, Linge K, et al. Reliability of pressure measurements: the EMED F system. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1991;6:14-18.
42. Putti AB, Arnold GP, Cochrane LA, Abboud RJ. Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed ST4 system. Gait Posture. 2008;27:501-505.
43. van der Leeden M, Dekker JH, Siemonsma PC, et al. Reproducibility of plantar pressure measurements in patients with chronic arthritis: a comparison of onestep, two-step, and three-step protocols and an estimate of the number of measurements required. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25: 739-744.
44. Metaxiotis D, Accles W, Pappas A, Doederlein L. Dynamic pedobarography (DPB) in operative management of cavovarus foot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21: 935-947.
45. Orlin MN, McPoil TG. Plantar pressure assessment. Phys Ther. 2000;80:399-409.
46. Barnes SZ, Berme N. Measurement of kinetic parameters technology. In: Craik RL, Oatis CA, eds. Gait Analysis: Theory and Application. St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book Inc; 1995:239-251.
47. Cheung RTN, Gabriel YF. Influence of different footwear on force of landing during running. Phys Ther. 2008;88:620-628.
48. Perry J. Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathologic Function. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc; 1992.
49. Riegger CL. Anatomy of the ankle and foot. Phys Ther. 1988;68:1802-1814.
50. Barnett CH. Phases of human gait. Lancet. 1956;22:617-621.
51. Cancilleri F, Marinozzi A, Martinelli N, et al. Comparison of plantar pressure, clinical, and radiological changes of the forefoot after biplanar Austin osteotomy and triplanar Boc osteotomy in patients with mild hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 2008; 29:817-824.
52. Aminian A, Kelikian A, Moen T. Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus deformity: an intermediate follow-up of clinical and radiographic outcomes. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:883-886.
53. Crevoisier X, Mouhsine E, Ortolano V, et al. The scarf osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus deformity: a review of 84 cases. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22: 970-976.
54. Hetherington VJ, Johnson RE, Albritton JS. Necessary dorsiflexion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint during gait. J Foot Surg. 1990;29:218-222.
55. Rosenbaum D, Hautmann S, Gold M, Claes L. Effects of walking speed on pressure distribution patterns and hindfoot angular motion. Gait Posture. 1994;2:191-197.