Metatarsalgia in hallux valgus deformity: A pedographic analysis

Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 300-308

  Waldecker, Ute ^a  

^a NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Hallux valgus deformity; Metatarsalgia; Pedography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FOOT; HALLUX VALGUS; HUMAN; METATARSALGIA; PRESSURE; SCORING SYSTEM; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

EID: 0036750527     PISSN: 10672516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1067-2516(02)80048-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Blomgren, M., Turan, I. Gait analysis in hallux valgus. J. Foot Surg. 30(1):70-1, 1991.
2. Libotte, M. EMED system clinical use in hallux valgus surgery. Gait and Posture 2(4):238, 1994, 4th EMED User Meeting, Ulm, Germany, July 1994.
3. Nyska, M. Plantar foot pressure distribution in patients with hallux valgus treated by distal soft tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy. Gait and Posture 2(4):239, 1994, 4th EMED User Meeting, Ulm, Germany 30.6-2.7, 1994.
4. Ogiuchi, T. Pre- and postoperative dynamic plantar pressure measurement in patients with hallux valgus. Congress of the International Federation of Foot and Ankle Societies (XXth CIP Meeting), Kyoto, Japan, Oct. 1999.
5. Wanivenhaus, A., Brettschneider, W. Influence of metatarsal head displacement on metatarsal pressure distribution after hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle 14:85-89, 1993.
6. Sakamoto, T. Foot pressure analysis in patients with hallux valgus using anew method. Congress of the International Federation of Foot and Ankle Societies (XXth CIP Meeting), Kyoto, Japan, Oct. 1999.
7. Meyers-Rice, B. The evaluation of the one-step versus two-step methods in comparison to full gait plantar pressure data collection. The Third EMED User Meeting, College of Health Professions Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, Aug. 1992.
8. Meyers-Rice, B., Sugars, L., McPoil, T. Comparison of three methods for obtaining plantar pressures in nonpathologic subjects. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 84:499-504, 1994.
9. Hughes, J., Kriss, S., Klenerman, L. A clinician's view of foot pressure: a comparison of three different methods of measurement. Foot Ankle 7:277-284, 1987.
10. Hughes, J., Pratt, L., Linge, K., Clak, P., Klenerman, L. Reliability of pressure measurements: the EMED - F System. J. Clin. Biomech. 6(1):14-18, 1991.
11. Rastogi, R., DeLozier, G., Alexander, I. Reproducibility of anatomical area specific impulses and pressure-time integral radiograph based masking using the EMED SF. The First EMED User Meeting, Flagstaff, AZ, Aug. 1992.
12. Henning, E. M., Rosenbaum, D. Pressure distribution patterns under the feet of children in comparison to adults. Foot Ankle 11:306-311, 1991.
13. Jacob, H. A. C., Hayafune, Y. Forces acting in the forefoot during normal gait. EMED Millennium Meeting, Munich, Germany, Aug. 2000.
14. Hutton, W. C., Danendran, M. The mechanics of normal and hallux valgus feet: a quantitative study. Clin. Orthop. 157:7-13, 1981.
15. Wanivenhaus, A., Pretterklieber, M. First tarsometatarsal joint: anatomical biomechanical study. Foot Ankle 9:153-157, 1989.
16. Johnson, K. A. Editorial. Foot Ankle 9:212, 1998.
17. Rush S. M., Christensen, J. C., Johnson, C. H. Biomechanics of the first ray. Part 2: Metatarsus primus varus as a cause of hypermobility. A three-dimensional kinematic analysis in a cadaver model. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 39(2):68-77, 2000.
18. Aquino, A., Payne, C. Function of the windlass mechanism in excessive pronated feet. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 91(5): 245-250, 2001.
19. Thordarson, D. B., Kumar P. J., Hedman, T. P., Ebramzadeh, E. Effect of partial versus complete plantar fasciotomy on the windlass mechanism. Foot Ankle Int. 18(1):16-20, 1997.