Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed® ST4 system

Gait and Posture

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 501-505

  Putti, A B ^a   Arnold, G P ^a   Cochrane, L A ^a   Abboud, R J ^a  

^a TORT Centre   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Barefoot; Emed ST4; Normal; Pressure; Repeatability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; FEMALE; FOOT; HALLUX; HEEL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT; METATARSAL BONE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAMETER; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOE; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; FOOT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 44349084365     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Kernozek T., Roehrs T., and McGarvey S. Analysis of plantar loading parameters pre and post-surgical intervention for hallux valgus. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 12 3 (1997) S18-S19
2. Huber H., and Dutoit M. Dynamic foot-pressure measurement in the assessment of operatively treated clubfeet. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A 6 (2004) 1203-1210
3. Thometz J.G., Liu X.C., Tassone J.C., and Klein S. Correlation of foot radiographs with foot function as analyzed by plantar pressure distribution. J Pediatr Orthop 25 2 (2005) 249-252
4. Abboud R.J., Rowley D.I., and Newton R.W. Lower limb muscle dysfunction may contribute to foot ulceration in diabetic patients. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 15 1 (2000) 37-45
5. Abboud R.J., and Rowley D.I. Foot pressure measurement-history and development. Surgery of disorders of foot and ankle (1996), Martin Dunitz Ltd. p. 123-38 [chapter III.4]
6. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet i (1986) 307-310
7. Meyers-Rice B., Sugars L., McPoil T., and Cornwall M.W. Comparison of three methods for obtaining plantar pressures in nonpathologic subjects. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 84 10 (1994) 499-504
8. McPoil T.G., Cornwall M.W., Dupuis L., and Cornwell M. Variability of plantar pressure data, a comparison of the two-step and midgait methods. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 89 10 (1999) 495-501
9. Bryant A., Singer K., and Tinley P. Comparison of the reliability of plantar pressure measurements using the two-step and midgait methods of data collection. Foot Ankle Int 20 10 (1999) 646-650
10. Van der Leeden M., Dekker J.H., Siemonsma P.C., Lek-Westerhof S.S., and Steultjens M.P. Reproducibility of plantar pressure measurements in patients with chronic arthritis: a comparison of one-step, two-step, and three-step protocols and an estimate of the number of measurements required. Foot Ankle Int 25 10 (2004) 739-744
11. Akhlaghi F., Daw J., Pepper M., and Potter M.J. In-shoe step-to-step pressure variations. Foot 4 (1994) 62-68
12. Hughes J., Clark P., Linge K., and Klenerman L. A comparison of two studies of the pressure distribution under the feet of normal subjects using different equipment. Foot Ankle 14 9 (1993) 514-519
13. Bryant A.R., Tinley P., and Singer K.P. Normal values of plantar pressure measurements determined using the EMED-SF system. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 90 6 (2000) 295-299
14. Bennett P.J., and Duplock L.R. Pressure distribution beneath the human foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 83 (1993) 674
15. Shorten M., Eden K.B., and Himmelsbach J.A. Plantar pressure during barefoot walking. Presented at the 12th international congress of biomechanics. Los Angeles, University of California (1989) [abstract]
16. Hutton W.C., and Dhanendran M. The mechanics of normal and hallux valgus feet-a quantitative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 157 (1981) 7-13
17. Fuller E. Computerised gait evaluation. In: Valmassy R. (Ed). Clinical biomechanics of lower limb (1996), CV Mosby, St. Louis 179