Research on characteristics of present-day crustal motion and deformation in Kamchatka area

Acta Geophysica Sinica

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 720-731

  Meng, Guo Jie ^a   Shen, Xu Hui ^a   Vladimir, Smirnov ^b   Eugene, A Rogozhin ^c   Wu, Ji Cang ^d  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^b SCHMIDT INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS OF THE EARTH   (Russian Federation)

^c MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^d TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Crustal motion; GPS; Kamchatka area; Strain rate field

Indexed keywords

COUPLING; CRUSTAL DEFORMATION; CRUSTAL MOVEMENT; DILATION; DIP; GPS; MICROPLATE; ORIENTATION; PACIFIC PLATE; SEISMOLOGY; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; STRAIN RATE; SUBDUCTION ZONE;

EURASIA; KAMCHATKA; KAMCHATKA PENINSULA; RUSSIAN FEDERATION;

EID: 70149085169     PISSN: 00015733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Gordeev E I, Gusev A A, Levin V E, et al. Preliminary analysis of deformation at the Eurasia-Pacific-North America Plate junction from GPS data. Geophys. J. Int., 2001, 147:189-198
2. Cook D B, Fujita K, McMullen C A. Present-day interactions in Northeast Asia: North American, Eurasian, and Okhotsk Plates. J. Geodyn., 1986, 6:33-51
3. Savostin L, Zonenshain I., Baranov B. Geology and plate tectonic of the sea of Okhotsk. Am Geophys Union. Geodynamtcs ser., 1983, 11:189-221
4. Seno T, Sakurai T, Stein S. Can the Okotsk plate be discriminated from the North American plate? J. Geophys. Res., 1996, 101(B5):11305-11315
5. Mackey K G, Fujita K, Gunbina L V, et al. Seismicity of the Bering Strait region: Evidence for a Bering block. Geology, 1997, 25 7(11):979-982
6. Apel E V, Biirgmann R, Steblov G M, et al. Independent active microplate tectonics of northeast Asia from GPS velocities and block modeling. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2006, 33, L11303, doi:1029/2006GL026077
7. Tibaldi A. Recent surface faulting investigated in Kamchatka volcanic arc. EosTrans. AGU, 2004, 85(14):133, 134, 141
8. Arugs D F, Michael B H. Plate motion and crustal deformation estimated with geodetic data from the Global Positioning System. Geophys. Res. Lett., 1995, 22(15):1973-1976
9. Beavan J, Tregoning P, Bevis M, et al. Motion and rigidity of the pacific plate and implications for plate boundary deformation. J. Geophys. Res., 2002, 107 (2261), doi:10.1029/2001JB000282
10. Kahle H, Cocard M, Peter Y, et al. GPS-derived strain rate field within the boundary zones of the Eurasian, African, and Arabian plates. J. Geophys. Res., 2000, 105(B10):23353-23370
11. McClusky S, Balassanian S, Barka A, et al. Global Positioning System constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. J. Geophys. Res., 2000, 105(B3):5695-5719
12. Shen Z K, Lit J, Wang M. Contemporary crustal deformation around the southeast borderland of the Tibetan Plateau. J. Geophys. Res., 2005, 110, B11409, doi:10.1029/2004JB003421 (Pubitemid 43051450)
13. Biirgmann R, Kogan M G, Levin V E, et al. Rapid aseismic moment release following the 5 December, 1997 Kronotsk, Kamchatka, earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2001, 28(7):1331-1334
14. Búrgmann R, Kogan M G, Steblov G M, et al. Interseismic coupling and asperity distribution along the Kamchatka subduction zone. J. Geophys. Re., 2005, 110, B07405, doi: 10. 1029/2005JB003648
15. Gordeev E, Levin V, Kasahara, et al. GPS monitoring in Kuril-Kamchatka and Aleutian arcs junction. Eos Trans. AGU, 1999, 80(46):948
16. Kogan M, Steblov M K, King R W, et al. Geodetic constraints on the rigidity and relative motion of Eurasia and North America. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2000, 27(14):2041-2044
17. Takashi H, Kadahara M, Kimata F, et al. Velocity field of around the Sea of Okotsk and Sea of Japan regions determined from a new continuous GPS network. Geophys. Res. Lett., 1999, 26(16):2533-2536
18. Sella G F, Dixon T H, Mao A. REVEL: A model for recent plate velocities from space geodesy. J. Geophys. Res., 2002, 107, B4, 2081 doi:10. 1029/2000JB000033
19. Steblov G M, Kogan M G, King R W, et al. Imprint of the North American plate in Siberia revealed by GPS. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2003, 30:2041-2044
20. Prawirodirdjo L, Bock Y. Instantaneous global plate motion model from 12 years of continuous GPS observations. J. Geophys. Re., 2004, 109, B08405, doi:10. 1029/2003JB002944
21. Mao A, Harrson C, Dixon T H. Noise in GPS coordinates times series. J. Geophys. Res., 1999, 104:2797-2816
22. Argus D F, Gordon R G. Tests of the rigid-plate hypothesis and bounds on intraplate deformation using geodetic data from very long baseline interferometry. J. Geophys. Res., 1996, 101:13555-13572
23. Larson K M, Freymueller J T, Philipsen S. Global plate velocities from Global Positioning System. J. Geophys. Res., 1997, 102:9961-9981
24. Geist E L, Scholl D W. Large-scale deformation related to the collision of the Aleutian arc with Kamchatka. Tectonics, 1994, 13:538-560
25. Riegel S, Fujita K. Extrusion tectonics of the Okhotsk plate, Northeast Asia. Geophys. Res. Lett., 1993, 20(7):607-610
26. England P, Molnar P. Late Quaternary to decadal velocity fields in Asia. J. Geophys. Res., 2005, 110, B12401, doi: 10. 1029/2004JB003541
27. Wessel P, Bercovici D. Interpolation with splines in tension: A Green's function approach. Mathematical Geology, 1998, 30:77-93
28. Gan W, Prescott W H. Crustal deformation rates in central and eastern U. S. inferred from GPS. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2001, 28(19):3733-3736
29. Jin S, Park P H. Strain accumulation in South Korea inferred from GPS measurements. Earth Planets Space, 2006, 58:529-534
30. Meng G J, Shen X H, Wu J C, et al. Strain computation methods of GPS network in crustal deformation monitoring and program design. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics (in Chinese), 2006, 26(2):70-74
31. Shi Y L, Zhu S B. Discussion on methods of calculating strain with GPS displacement data. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics (in Chinese), 2006, 26(1):1-7
32. Savage J C, Gan W, Svarc J L. Strain accumulation and rotation in the Eastern California Shear Zone. J. Geophys. Res., 2001, 106(B10):21995-22007
33. Kreemer C, Holt W E, Haines A J. An integrated global model of present-day plate motions and plate boundary deformation. Geophys. J. Int., 2003, 154:8-34
34. Calais E, Dong L, Wang M, et al. Continental deformation in Asia from a combined GPS solution. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2006, 33, L24319, doi: 10. 1029/2006GL028433
35. Wu J C, Deng K W, Chen Y Q. Effect of triangle shape factor on precision of crustal deformation calculated. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics (in Chinese), 2003, 23(3):26-30
36. Li Y X, Zhang J H, He J K, et al. Current-day tectonic motionandintraplatedeformation-strainfieldobtainedfrom space geodesy in the Pacific Plate. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 2007, 50(2):437-453
37. Kreemer C, Haines J, Holt W E, et al. On the determination of a global strain rate model. Earth Planets Space, 2000, 52:765-770
38. Kozhrin A I. Active faulting at the Eurasian, North American and Pacific plates junction. Tectonophysics, 2004, 380:273-285
39. Demets C. A test of present-day plate geometries for northeast Asia and Japan. J. Geophys. Res., 1992, 97(B12):17627-17635
40. Bird P. An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2003, 4(3):1-52
41. Gorbatov A, Kostoglodov V, Sudrez G. Seismicity and structure of the Kamchatka subduction zone. J. Geophys. Res., 1997, 102(B8):17883-17898
42. Park J, Vadim L, Mark B, et al. A dangling slab, amplified arc volcanism, mantle flow and seismic anisotropy in the Kamchatka plate corner. In: Stein S, et al. eds. Global Plate Boundary, Geodynam, Series. Am. Geophys. Union, 2002, 30:295-324
43. Gordeev E, Kasahara M, Eichelberger J. Return to Petropavlovsk- Kamchatsky: Subduction in the Far North. Eos Trans. AGV, 2004, 85(44):452-453