Understanding the context of design - Towards tactical user centered design

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 358, Issue , 2008, Pages 353-362

  Svanæs, Dag ^a   Gulliksen, Jan ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Context of design; Obstacles; Usability; User centered design

Indexed keywords

CLIENT ORGANIZATIONS; CONTEXT OF DESIGN; DESIGN PROCESS; DESIGN PROJECTS; END-PRODUCTS; END-USERS; INTERNAL STRUCTURE; OBSTACLES; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING TOOLS; SYSTEM USABILITY; SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT; USABILITY; USER CENTERED DESIGNS; USER-CENTERED; USER-CENTERED DESIGN; USER-CENTERED DESIGN PROCESS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

DESIGN;

EID: 70049105542     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1463160.1463199     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. ISO 9241-11:1998 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). Part 11 Guidance on usability.
2. ISO 13407:1999 Human-centred design processes for interactive systems.
3. Earthy, J., Jones, B.S., and Bevan, N., The improvement of human-centred processes-facing the challenge and reaping the benefit of ISO 13407. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 2001. 55(4): p. 553-585.
4. Bevan, N., Claridge, N., Athousaki, M., Maguire, M., et al., PRUE European Project Final Report: Guide to specifying and evaluating usability as part of a contract. 2002, http://www.usability.serco.com/prue/index.htm.
5. Bevan, N. and Bogomolni, I., Incorporating user quality requirements in the software development process. Proceedings 4th International Software Quality Week Europe, Brussels, 2000: p. 1192-1204.
6. ISO 18529:2000 Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction-Human-Centered Lifecycle Process Descriptions.
7. Shneiderman, B., Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human computer interaction. AddisonWesley. Reading, MA, 1986.
8. Poltrock, S.E. and Grudin, J., Organizational Obstacles to Interface and Development: Two Participant-Observer Studies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human InteractIon, 1994. 1(1): p. 52-80.
9. Norman, D., Design as Practiced in T. Winograd (ed) Bringing design to software. 1996: ACM Press New York, NY, USA.
10. Grudin, J., The organizational contexts of development and use. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 1996. 28(1): p. 169-171.
11. Wilson, S., Bekker, M., Johnson, P., and Johnson, H., Helping and hindering user involvement-a tale of everyday design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1997: p. 178-185.
12. Gulliksen, J., Boivie, I., Persson, J., Hektor, A., et al., Making a difference: a survey of the usability profession in Sweden. Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, 2004: p. 207-215.
13. Law, E.L.C., Evaluating the Downstream Utility of User Tests and Examining the Developer Effect: A Case Study. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 21(2): p. 147-172.
14. Artman, H., Procurer usability requirements: negotiations in contract development. Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, 2002: p. 61-70.
15. Markensten, E., Mind the gap: a procurement approach to integrating user-centred design in contract development: KTH, Numerical Analysis and Computer Science.
16. Martin, D., Procter, R., Mariani, J., and Rouncefield, M., Working the contract. Proceedings of the 2007 conference of the computer-human interaction special interest group (CHISIG) of Australia on Computer-human interaction: design: activities, artifacts and environments, 2007: p. 241-248.
17. Ehn, P., Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. 1990: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Mahwah, NJ, USA.
18. Shapiro, D., Participatory design: the will to succeed. Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility, 2005: p. 29-38.
19. Beck, E., P for Political: Participation is Not Enough. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 2002. 14(1): p. 77-92.
20. Balka, E., Inside the belly of the beast: the challenges and successes of a reformist participatory agenda. Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design-Volume 1, 2006: p. 134-143.
21. Hope, V. and Overgaard, B., Involving health workers in the development of hospital ICT: An analysis of UCD practice (In Norwegian). 2004, Trondheim: NSEP - NTNU.
22. Nygaard, K., Program Development as a Social Activity. Information Processing, 1986. 86: p. 189-198.
23. Earthy, J., Usability Maturity Model: Human Centredness Scale. EC Telematics Applications Project IE. 2016.
24. Reitan, R., Integrating UCD in RUP: a Case Study (in Norwegian). M.Sc thesis, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway, 2005.
25. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., and Rumbaugh, J., The unified software development process. 1999: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Boston, MA, USA.
26. Öhman Persson, J., The Obvious & The Essential: Interpreting Software Development & Organizational Change.
27. Boivie, I., Åborg, C., Persson, J., and Löfberg, M., Why usability gets lost or usability in in-house software development. Interacting with Computers, 2003. 15(4): p. 623-639.
28. Gulliksen, J., Göransson, B., Boivie, I., Blomkvist, S., et al., Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2003. 22(6): p. 397-409.
29. Kumar, K. and van Dissel, H.G., Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems. MIS Quarterly, 1996. 20(3): p. 279-300.
30. Finnegan, P., Galliers, R.D., and Powell, P., Systems Planning in Business-to-Business Electronic Commerce Environments. Information Technology and Management, 2003. 4(2): p. 183-198.
31. Bias, R.G. and Mayhew, D.J., Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for an Internet Age. 2005: Morgan Kaufmann.
32. Göransson, B., Lif, M., and Gulliksen, J., Usability Design- Extending Rational Unified Process with a New Discipline. Proceedings of Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems DSV-IS 2003, 2003: p. 4-6.
33. Lauesen, S. and Vium, J.P., Experiences from a tender process. International Workshop on Requirements Engineering, REFSQ, 2004. 4: p. 2004.
34. Skjetne, J.H., Prototypes and tender documentation, in User Involvement in e-Government Development Projects. Results from INTERACT 2005 workshop, A. Følstad, J. Krogstie, R. Oppermann, and D. Svanæs, Editors. 2005, SINTEF: Oslo.
35. Evbuomwan, N.F.O. and Anumba, C.J., An integrated framework for concurrent life-cycle design and construction. Advances in Engineering Software, 1998. 29(7-9): p. 587-597.
36. Wagner, I., A web of fuzzy problems: confronting the ethical issues. Communications of the ACM, 1993. 36(6): p. 94-101.
37. Boehm, B.W., A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer, 1988. 21(5): p. 61-72.