'Cannot predict now': The role of repositories in the future of the journal

The Future of the Academic Journal

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 197-211

  Shreeves, Sarah L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70049095218     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-84334-416-2.50010-0     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Bailey C.W. What is open access?. Open Access: Key Strategies 2006, 13-26. Chandos Publishing, Technical and Economic Aspects, Oxford. N. Jacobs (Ed.).
2. Bankier J.-G., Perciali I. The institutional repository rediscovered: What can a university do for open access publishing?. Serials Review 2008, 34(1):21-26.
3. Crow R. The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper 2002, available at:, (accessed 28 April 2008). http://www.arl.org/sparc/bm%7Edoc/ir_final_release_102.pdf.
4. Ellison G. The slowdown of the economics publishing process. Journal of Political Economy 2002, 110(5):947-993.
5. Ellison G. Is Peer Review in Decline? 2007, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
6. Floyd R. The NEW IUScholarWorks at Indiana University: Repositories, journals and scholarly publishing 2008, 28-30.
7. Foster N.F., Gibbons S. Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine 2005, 11(1). available at:, (accessed 7 May 2008). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html.
8. Ginsparg P. As we may read. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 26(38):9606-9608.
9. Guédon J.-C. The 'green' and 'gold' roads to open access: the case for mixing and matching. Serials Review 2004, 30(4):315-328.
10. Hahn K. Research Library Publishing Services: New Options for University Publishing 2008, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC, available at:, (accessed 8 March 2009). http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/research-librarypublishing-services.pdf.
11. Harnad S. E-prints: electronic preprints and postprints. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science 2003, 990-992. Marcel Dekker, New York. M.J. Bates, M.N. Maack, M. Drake (Eds.).
12. Harnad S. OA needs open evidence, not anonymous innuendo 2008, available at:, (accessed 16 February 2009). http://www.openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/categories/3-Peer-Review.
13. Harnad S., Brody T., Vallieres F., Carr L., Hitchcock S., Gingras Y., Oppenheim C., Stamerjohanns H., Hilf E. The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review 2004, 30(4):310-314.
14. Henneken E.A., Kurtz M.J., Warner S., Ginsparg P., Eichhorn G., Accomazzi A., Grant C.S., Thompson D., Bohlen E., Murray S.S. E-prints and journal articles in astronomy: a productive coexistence. Learned Publishing 2007, 20(1):16-22.
15. Krillidou M., Young M. ARL statistics 2005-06: A compilation of statistics from the one hundred and twenty-three members of the association of research libraries 2008, available at:, (accessed 7 May 2008). http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/arlstats06.pdf.
16. Lynch C.A. Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL: A Bimonthly Report 2003, No. 226, available at:, (accessed 28 April 2008). http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/br/br226/br226ir.shtml.
17. Markey K., Rieh S.Y., Jean B., Kim J., Yakel E. Census of Institutional Repositories in the United States: MIRACLE Project Research Findings 2007, Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, DC.
18. McDowell C.S. Evaluating institutional repository deployment in American academe since early 2005: repositories by the numbers, part 2. D-Lib Magazine 2007, 9(10). available at:, (accessed 28 April 2008). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september07/mcdowell/09mcdowell.html.
19. Morris S. Open access: how are publishers reacting?. Serials Review 2004, 30(4):304-307.
20. Newman K.A., Blecic D.D., Armstrong K.L. Scholarly Communication Education Initiatives: SPEC Kit 299 2007, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC.
21. Nguyen T. Open Doors and Open Minds: What Faculty Authors Can Do to Ensure Open Access to Their Work through Their Institution 2008, SPARC and Science Commons, Washington, DC and Cambridge, MA.
22. Panitch J.M., Michalak S. The serials crisis: a white paper for the UNC-Chapel Hill Scholarly Communications Convocation 2005, available at:, (accessed 7 May 2008). http://www.unc.edu/scholcomdig/whitepapers/panitchmichalak.html.
23. Pinfield S. How do physicists use an e-print archive? Implications for institutional e-print services. D-Lib Magazine 2001, 7(12). available at:, (accessed 7 May 2008). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december01/pinfield/12pinfield.html.
24. Poynder R. Clear blue water available at:, (accessed 7 May 2008). http://www.ia310134.us.archive.org/1/items/The_Basement_Interviews/BlueWaterMain.pdf.
25. Prosser D.C. Scholarly communication in the 21st century - the impact of new technologies and models. Serials 2003, 16(2):163-167.
26. Salo D. The innkeeper at the roach motel. Library Trends 2008, 57(2):98-123.
27. Van Orsdel L.C., Born K. Periodical price survey 2008: embracing openness. Library Journal 2008, available at:, (accessed 28 April 2008). http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6547086.html.