On the interactions between top-down anticipation and bottom-up regression

Frontiers in Neurorobotics

Volumn 1, Issue NOV, 2007, Pages

  Tani, Jun ^a  

^a RIKEN BRAIN SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bottom up; Dynamical systems; Mirror neurons; RNN; Self organization; Top down

Indexed keywords

EID: 70049093526     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16625218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/neuro.12.002.2007     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arbib, M. (1981). Perceptual structures and distributed motor control. In Handbook of Physiology: The Nervous System, II. Motor Control (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press), pp. 1448-1480
2. Beer, R. (1995). A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction Artif. Intell. 72(1), 173-215
3. Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artif. Intell. J. 47, 139-159
4. Brooks, R. A. (1999). Cambrian intelligence: the early history of the new ai (Cambridge, MA, USA, MIT Press)
5. Dayan, P., and Hinton, G. (1993). Feudal reinforcement learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 5, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference in Denver, C. L. Giles, S. J. Hanson, and J. D. Cowan, eds. (San Mateo, CA, Morgan Kaufmann)
6. Demiris, J., and Hayes, G. (2002). Imitation as a dual-route process featuring predictive and learning components: a biologically plausible computational model. 327-361
7. Doya, K., and Yoshizawa, S. (1989). Memorizing oscillatory patterns in the analog neuron network. In Proceedings of 1989 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Washington, D.C., pp. I:27-32
8. Elman, J. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognit. Sci. 14, 179-211
9. Evans, G. (1981). Semantic theory and tacit knowledge. In Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule, S. Holzman, and C. Leich eds. (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul), pp. 118-137
10. Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42, 335-346
11. Ito, M., and Tani, J. (2004). On-line imitative interaction with a humanoid robot using a dynamic neural network model of a mirror system. Adapt. Behav. 12(2), 93-114
12. Jaeger, H., and Haas, H. (2004). Harnessing nonlinearity: predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless communication. Science, 78-80
13. Jordan, M. (1986). Attractor dynamics and parallelism in a connectionist sequential machine. In Proceedings of Eighth Annual Conference of Cognitive Science Society (Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum), pp. 531-546
14. Kawato, M., Furukawa, K., and Suzuki, R. (1987). A hierarchical neural network model for the control and learning of voluntary movement. Biol. Cybern. 57, 169-185
15. Morimoto, J., and Doya, K. (1998). Hierarchical reinforcement learning of lowdimensional subgoals and high-dimensional trajectories. 2, 850-853
16. Pollack, J. (1991). The induction of dynamical recognizers. Mach. Learn. 7, 227-252
17. Rumelhart, D., Hinton, G., and Williams, R. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In Parallel Distributed Processing, D. Rumelhart, and J. McClelland eds. (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press), pp. 318-362
18. Steels, L. (2003). Intelligence with representation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 361(1811), 2381-2395
19. Tani, J. (1996). Model-based learning for mobile robot navigation from the dynamical systems perspective. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. (B) 26(3), 421-436
20. Tani, J. (1998). An interpretation of the "self" from the dynamical systems perspective: a constructivist approach. J. Conscious. Stud. 5(5-6), 516-42
21. Tani, J. (2003). Learning to generate articulated behavior through the bottom-up and the top-down interaction process. Neural Netw. 16, 11-23
22. Tani, J. (2004). The dynamical systems accounts for phenomenology of immanent time: an interpretation by revisiting a robotics synthetic study. J. Conscious. Stud. 11(9), 5-24
23. Tani, J., and Ito, M. (2003). Self-organization of behavioral primitives as multiple attractor dynamics: a robot experiment. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A 33(4), 481-488
24. Tani, J., Ito, M., and Sugita, Y. (2004). Self-organization of distributedly represented multiple behavior schemata in a mirror system: reviews of robot experiments using RNNPB. Neural Netw. 17, 1273-1289
25. Tani, J., and Nolfi, S. (1998). Learning to perceive the world as articulated: an approach for hierarchical learning in sensory-motor systems. In From Animals to Animats 5, R. Pfeifer, B. Blumberg, J. Meyer, and S. Wilson eds. (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press) (later published in Neural Netw. (1999), 12, 1131-1141)
26. Tani, J., and Nolfi, S. (1999). Learning to perceive the world as articulated: an approach for hierarchical learning in sensory-motor systems. Neural Netw. 12, 1131-1141
27. Varela, F., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind (Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press)
28. Werbos, P. (1990). A menu of designs for reinforcement learning over time. In Neural Networks for Control, W. Miller, R. Sutton, and P. Werbos eds. (Boston, MA, MIT Press), pp. 67-95
29. Wolpert, D., and Kawato, M. (1998). Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw. 11, 1317-1329
30. Ziemke, T., Jirenhed, D., and Hesslow, G. (2005). Internal simulation of perception: minimal neurorobotic model. Neurocomputing (in press)