Error-specific and individualised feedback in a Web-based language tutoring system: Do they read it?

ReCALL

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 99-109

  Heift, Trude ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937342268     PISSN: 09583440     EISSN: 14740109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S095834400100091X     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Brandl, K. K. (1995) Strong and Weak Students Preference for Error Feedback Options and Responses. Modern Language Journal, 79: 194-211.
2. Carroll, S. and Swain, M. (1993) Explicit and Implicit Negative Feedback. An Empirical Study of the Learning of Linguistics Generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15: 357-386.
3. Conrad, K. B. (1996) CALL-Non-English L2 Instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 16: 158-181.
4. Elsom-Cook, M. (1988) Guided Discovery Tutoring and Bounded User Modelling. In: Self, J. (ed.), Artificial Intelligence and Human Learning, Bristol: J. W. Arrowsmith Ltd., 165-178.
5. Garrett, N. (1987) A Psycholinguistic Perspective on Grammar and CALL. In: Smith, W. F. (ed.), Modern Media in Foreign Language Education: Theory and Implementation. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook, 169-196.
6. Hagen, L. K. (1994) Unification-Based Parsing Applications for Intelligent Foreign Language Tutoring Systems. CALICO Journal, 12 2: 5-31.
7. Hegelheimer, V. and Chapelle, C. (2000) Methodological Issues in Research on Learner-Computer Interactions in CALL. Language Learning & Technology, 4 (1): 41-59.
8. Heift, T. and Nicholson, D. S. (2000) Theoretical and Practical Considerations for Web-based Intelligent Language Tutoring Systems. In Gauthier, G., Frasson, C. and VanLehn, K., (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. 5th International Conference, ITS 2000, Montreal, Canada, June 2000: 354-362.
9. Heift, T. and McFetridge, P. (1999) Exploiting the Student Model to Emphasize Language Teaching Pedagogy in Natural Language Processing. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computer-Mediated Language Assessment and Evaluation in Natural Language Processing, ACL/IALL′1999, Maryland: 55-62.
10. Heift, T. (1998) Designed Intelligence: A Language Teacher Model. PhD Dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Canada.
11. Holland, M. V., Kaplan, J. D. and Sama, M. R. (eds.) (1995) Intelligent Language Tutors: Theory Shaping Technology. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Labrie, G. and Singh, L. P. S. (1991) Parsing, Error Diagnostics, and Instruction in a French Tutor. CALICO Journal, 9: 9-25.
13. Levin, L. S. and Evans, D. A. (1995) ALICE-chan: A Case Study in ICALL Theory and Practice. In: Holland et al.,: 77-99.
14. Lightbown, P. M. and Spada, N. (1990) Focus-on-Form and Corrective Feedback in Communicative Language Teaching. Effects on Second Language Teaching. SSLA, 12: 429-448.
15. Loritz, D. (1995) GPARS: A Suite of Grammar Assessment Systems. In Holland et al.,: 77-99.
16. Nagata, N. (1996) Computer vs. Workbook Instruction in Second Language Acquisition. CALICO, 14 (1): 53-75.
17. Nagata, N. (1995) An Effective Application of Natural Language Processing in Second Language Instruction. CALICO, 13 (1): 47-67.
18. Nagata, N. (1991). Intelligent Computer Feedback for Second Language Instruction. Modern Language Journal, 77: 330-338.
19. Nagata, N. and Swisher, V. (1995) A Study of Consciousness-Raising by Computer: The Effect of Metalinguistic Feedback on Second Language Learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28 (3): 337-347.
20. Pujolà, J.-T. (2001) Did CALL Feedback Feed Back? ReCALL, 13 (1).
21. Sanders, R. (1991) Error Analysis in Purely Syntactic Parsing of Free Input: The Example of German. CALICO, 9 (1): 72-89.
22. Schachter, J. (1986) The Epistemological Status of Second Language Acquisition. Second Language Research, 2: 120-159.
23. Schachter, J. (1984) A Universal Input Condition. In: W. Rutherford (ed.), Language Universals and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 167-183.
24. Schwind, C. B. (1995) Error Analysis and Explanation in Knowledge Based Language Tutoring. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8 (4): 295-325.
25. Van der Linden, E. (1993) Does Feedback Enhance Computer-Assisted Language Learning. Computers & Education, 21 (1-2): 61-65.
26. Wang, Y. and Garigliano, R. (1992) An Intelligent Language Tutoring System for Handling Errors Caused by Transfer. In: Frasson, C., Gauthier, G. and McCalla, G. I. (eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 395-404.
27. Yang, J. and Akahori, K. (1999) An Evaluation of Japanese CALL Systems n the WWW. Comparing a Freely Input Approach with Multiple Selection. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12 (1): 59-79.
28. Yang, J. and Akahori, K. (1997) Development of Computer Assisted Language Learning System for Japanese Writing Using Natural Language Processing Techniques: A Study on Passive Voice. Proceedings of the Workshop Intelligent Educational Systems on the World Wide Web, 8th Conference of the AIED Society, Kobe, Japan. http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~plb/AIED97_workshop/Yang/Yang.html.