Variations in dna methylation in Picea omorika (Panč) purk. Embryogenic tissue and the ability for embryo maturation

Propagation of Ornamental Plants

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-9

  Leljak Levanić, Dunja ^a   Mihaljević, Snježana ^b   Jelaska, Sibila ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

^b RUDER BO KOVI INSTITUTE   (Croatia)

Author keywords

5 azacytidine; DNA methylation; Maturation ability; Picea omorika; Somatic embryogenesis

Indexed keywords

PICEA; PICEA OMORIKA;

EID: 69949178791     PISSN: 13119109     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bellarosa R., Mo H. L., von Arnold S. (1992). The influence of auxin and cytokinin on proliferation and morphology of somatic embryos of Picea abies (L) Karst. Annals of Botany, 70: 199-206.
2. Bernacchia G., Primo A., Giorgetti L., Pitto L., Cella R. (1998). Carrot DNA-methyltransferase is encoded by two classes of genes with differing patterns of expression. The Plant Journal, 13: 317-329.
3. Besendorfer V., Šiljak-Yakovlev S., Mihaljević S., Jelenić S., Jelaska S., Papeš D. (1999). Karyotype analysis of Picea omorika (Panč.) Purk. in vivo and in vitro with a special emphasis on nucleolar organizer regions (NORs). In: Guttenberger H., Borzan Z., Schlarbaum S. C., Hartman T. P. V. (Eds.). Cytogenetic Studies of Forest Trees and Shrubs - Review, Present Status, and Outlook on the Future, Special Issue of Forest Genetics, Arbora Publishers: 27-31.
4. Bozhkov P. V., Filonova L., von Arnold S. (2002). A key developmental switch during Norway spruce somatic embryogenesis is induced by withdrawal of growth regulators and is associated with cell death and extracellular acidification. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 77: 658-667.
5. Cai Q. C., Guy C. L., Moore G. A. (1996). Detection of cytosine methylation and mapping of a gene influencing cytosine methylation in the genome of Citrus. Genome, 39: 235-242.
6. Causevic A., Delaunay A., Ounnar S., Righezza M., Delmotte F., Brignollas F., Hagege D., Maury S. (2005). DNA methylating and demethylating treatments modify phenotype and cell wall differentiation stage in sugarbeet cell lines. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 43: 681-691.
7. Dunstan D. I., Bethun T. D., Bock C. A. (1993). Somatic embryo maturation from long-term suspension cultures of white spruce (Picea glauca). In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant, 29P: 109-112.
8. Filonova L. H., Bozhkov P. V., von Arnold S. (2000). Developmental pathway of somatic embryogenesis in Picea abies as revealed by time-lapse tracking. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51: 249-264.
9. Fraga M. F., Rodriguez R., Canal M. J. (2002). Genomic DNA methylation-demethylation during aging and reinvigoration of Pinus radiata. Tree Physiology, 22: 813-816.
10. Fridborg G., Pedersen M., Landström L. E., Eriksson T. (1978). The effect of activated charcoal on tissue culture: adsorption of metabolites inhibiting morphogenesis. Physiologia Plantarum, 43: 104-106.
11. Harry I. S., Thorpe T. A. (1991). Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from mature zygotic embryos of red spruce. Botanical Gazette, 152: 446-452.
12. Jaligot E., Rival A., Beulé T., Dussert S., Verdeil J.-L. (2000). Somaclonal variation in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.): the DNA methylation hypothesis. Plant Cell Reports, 19: 684-690.
13. mCCG methylation in angiosperms. The Plant Journal, 9: 579-586.
14. Johnston J. W., Harding K., Bremner D. H., Souch G., Green J., Lynch P. T., Grout B., Benson E. E. (2005). HPLC analysis of plant DNA methylation: a study of critical methodological factors. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 43: 844-853.
15. Kaeppler S. M., Phillips R. L. (1993). DNA methylation and tissue culture-induced variation in plants. In Vitro Cell Developmental Biology-Plant, 29: 125-130.
16. Kolevska-Pletikapić B., Krsnik-Rasol M., Lorković Z., Besendorfer V., Tramišak T., Jelaska S. (1995). Somatic embryogenesis in Picea omorika (Panč.) Purk. Acta Pharmaceutica, 45: 267-271.
17. Leljak-Levanić D., Bauer N., Mihaljević S., Jelaska S. (2004). Changes in DNA methylation during somatic embryogenesis in Cucurbita pepo L. Plant Cell Reports, 23: 120-127.
18. Lo Schiavo F., Pitto L., Giuliano G., Torti G., Nuti Ronchi V., Marazzati D., Vergara R., Orselli S., Terzi M. (1989). DNA methylation of embryogenic carrot cell cultures and its variations as caused by mutation, differentiations, hormones and demethylating drugs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 77: 325-331.
19. Mo H. L., Egertsdotter U., von Arnold S. (1996). Secretion of specific extracellular proteins by somatic embryos of Picea abies is dependent on embryo morphology. Annals of Botany, 77: 143-152.
20. Munksgaard D., Mattsson O., Okkles F. T. (1995). Somatic embryo development in carrot is associated with an increase in levels of S-adenosylmethionine, S-adenosylhomocysteine and DNA methylation. Physiologia Plantarum, 93: 5-10.
21. Nelson M., McClelland M. (1989). Effect of site-specific methylation on DNA modification methyltransferases and restriction endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Research (Supplement), 17: 389-415.
22. Palmgren G., Mattson O., Okkele F. T. (1991). Specific levels of DNA methylation in various tissues, cell lines, and cell types of Daucus carota. Plant Physiology, 95: 174-178.
23. Santi D. V., Norment A., Garrett C. E. (1984). Covalent bond formation between a DNA-cytosine methyltransferase and DNA containing 5-azacytosine. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 81: 6993-6997.
24. Stasolla C., Kong L., Yeung E. C., Thorpe T. A. (2002). Maturation of somatic embryos in conifers: morphogenesis, physiology, biochemistry, and molecular biology. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant, 38: 93-105.
25. Toldi O., Ahanen K., Kovács G., Sorvari S., Tóth S., Dulai S., Scott P. (2005). Integrated application of physiological and molecular methods to forecast determinative morphogenic events in tissue cultured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv Samsun) leaf disc. Plant Growth Regulators, 47: 59-64.
26. Tramišak Milaković T., Mihaljević S., Jelaska S. (1999). Effects of abscisic acid and carbohydrates on the maturation of Picea omorika (Panč.) Purk. somatic embryos. Acta Botanica Croatica, 58: 87-97.
27. Uphold W. B. (1977). Estimation of DNA sequence divergence from comparison of restriction endonuclease digest. Nucleic Acids Research, 4: 1257-1265.
28. van Zyl L., Bozhkov P. V., Clapham D. H., Sederoff R. R., von Arnold S. (2003). Up, down and up again is a signature global gene expression pattern at the beginning of gymnosperm embryogenesis. Gene Expression Patterns, 3: 83-91.
29. Vergara R., Verde F., Pitto L., Lo Schiavo F. L., Terzi M. (1990). Reversible variations in the methylation pattern of carrot DNA during somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Reports, 8: 697-700.
30. von Aderkas P., Label P., Lelu M.-A. (2002). Charcoal effects early development and hormonal concentrations of somatic embryos of hybrid larch. Tree Physiology, 22: 431-434.
31. von Aderkas P., Bonga J. M. (2000). Influencing micropropagation and somatic embryogenesis in mature trees by manipulation of phase change, stress and culture environment. Tree Physiology, 20: 921-928.
32. von Arnold S., Eriksson T. (1981). In vitro studies of adventitious shoot formation in Pinus contorta. Canadian Journal of Botany, 59: 870-874.
33. von Arnold S., Hakman I. (1988). Regulation of somatic embryo development in Picea abies by abscisic acid (ABA). Journal of Plant Physiology, 132: 164-169.
34. Xiao W., Custard K. D., Brown R. C., Lemmon B. E., Harada J. J., Goldberg R. B., Fischer R. L. (2006). DNA methylation is critical for Arabidopsis embryogenesis and seed viability. The Plant Cell, 18: 805-814.
35. Xu M., Li X., Korban S. S. (2004). DNA-methylation alternations and exchanges during in vitro cellular differentiation in rose (Rosa hybrida L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 109: 899-910.
36. Yamamoto N., Kobayashi H., Togashi T., Mori Y., Kikuchi K., Kuriyama K., Tokuji Y. (2005). Formation of embryogenic cell clumps from carrot epidermal cells is suppressed by 5-azacytidine, a DNA methylation inhibitor. Journal of Plant Physiology, 162: 47-54.