Exploring stakeholder engagement in impact evaluation planning in educational development work;Explorer l'implication des parties prenantes dans la planification de l'évaluation d'impact, dans le domaine du développement éducatif

Evaluation

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 285-306

  Hart, Diane ^a   Diercks O'Brien, Gabi ^a   Powell, Adrian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Educational development; Higher education; Impact evaluation; Stakeholder engagement; Theories of Change

Indexed keywords

EID: 69949102262     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389009105882     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anderson, A.A. (n.d.) The Community Builder's Approach to Theory of Change: A Practical Guide to Theory Development. New York: Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change. URL (consulted Nov. 2006 at http://www.aspeninstitute.org[>Programme:Roundtableoncommunitych ange]
2. Argyris, C. and D. Schön (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Argyris, C. and D. Schön (1996) Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Birckmayer, J.D. and C.H. Weiss (2000) 'Theory-Based Evaluation in Practice: What do we Learn?', Evaluation Review 24(4): 407-31.
5. Centre for Higher Education Research and Information (2005) Towards a Research Strategy on Learning and Teaching: Report to HEFCE. London: Centre for Higher Education Research and Information. URL (consulted Dec. 2006): http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2005/rd02_05/.
6. Coghlan, D. and T. Brannick (2001) Doing Action Research in your own Organization. London: SAGE.
7. Connell, J.P. and A.C. Kubisch (1998) Applying a Theory of Change Approach, in K. Fulbright Anderson, A. C. Kubisch and J. P. Connell (eds) New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives, vol. 2, Theory, Measurement, and Analysis. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
8. Diercks-O'Brien, G. (2005) A Meta-Analysis of 37 Projects Funded under the Learning and Teaching Development Grant Scheme. Sheffield: Learning and Teaching Services, University of Sheffield.
9. Diercks-O'Brien, G. and A. Powell (2005) An Impact Evaluation Framework for Learning and Teaching Activity. Sheffield: Learning and Teaching Services, University of Sheffield.
10. Gibbs, G. (2003) Implementing Learning and Teaching Strategies. Buckingham: TQEF National Co-ordination Team Report, Open University. URL (consulted Oct. 2006): at http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/documents/ilts.pdf
11. Gosling, D. (2001) What Educational Development Units Do: Five Years on, International Journal for Academic Development 6: 74-92.
12. Gosling, D. (2004) The Impact of a National Policy to Enhance Teaching Quality and Status, England, the United Kingdom, Quality Assurance in Education 12(3): 136-49.
13. Gregory, A. (2000) Problematizing Participation: A Critical Review of Approaches to Participation in Evaluation Theory, Evaluation 6(2): 179-99.
14. Guba, E.G. and Y.S. Lincoln (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
15. Hart, D. (2008) Exploring Participation in the Evaluation of Change in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, The Evaluator (Autumn issue). Ware: UK Evaluation Society.
16. Harvey, L. (2005) A History and Critique of Quality Evaluation in the UK, Quality Assurance in Education 13(4): 263-76.
17. Helsby, G. and M. Saunders (1993) Taylorism, Tylorism and Performance Indicators: Defending the Indefensible?, Educational Studies 19(1): 55-77.
18. Higher Education Funding Council for England (1999) Teaching Quality Enhancement Fund: Funding Arrangements Circular 99/48, Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England. URL (consulted Oct. 2006): http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/1999/99_48.htm
19. Higher Education Funding Council for England (2002) Teaching Quality Enhancement Fund: Funding Arrangements 2002-03 to 2004-5. Reference 02/24, Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England. URL (consulted Sept. 2008): http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2002/02_24.htm
20. Higher Education Funding Council for England (2006a) Teaching Quality Enhancement Fund: Funding Arrangements 2006-7 to 2008-9 Reference 2006/11, Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England. URL (consulted Sept. 2008): http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2006/06_11/
21. Higher Education Funding Council for England (2006b) Learning and Teaching Evaluation Framework. URL (consulted Dec. 2006): http://www.hefce.ac.uk/learning/evaluation
22. Higher Education Funding Council for England (2006c) Embedding Learning and Teaching Strategies: An Approach to Self-Assessment by Higher Education Institutions. URL (consulted Dec. 2006): http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2006/06_35/
23. Hughes, M. and T. Taynor (2000) Reconciling Process and Outcome in Evaluating Community Initiatives, Evaluation 6(1): 37-49.
24. Johnson, P. and J. Duberley (2000) Understanding Management Research: An Introduction to Epistemology. London: SAGE.
25. Julian, D.A., A. Jones and D. Deyo (1995) Open Systems Evaluation and the Logic Model: Programme Planning and Evaluation Tools, Evaluation and Program Planning 18(4): 333-41.
26. Kawalek, J. and N. Jayaratna (2003) Benchmarking the Process of "Interpretive" Research in Information Systems, Benchmarking: An International Journal 10(4): 400-13.
27. Kember, D. (2002) Long-Term Outcomes of Educational Action Research Projects, Educational Action Research 10(1): 83-103.
28. Kolb, D.A. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29. Lancaster University (2002) Evaluating the Learning and Teaching Support Network, 3rd Biannual Report to the LTSN Executive. Lancaster: Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University.
30. Lave, J. and E. Wenger (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Lewin, K. (1946) Action Research and Minority Problems, Journal of Social Issues 2: 34-46.
32. Mackenzie, M. and A. Blamey (2005) The Practice and the Theory: Lessons from the Application of a Theories of Change Approach, Evaluation 11(2): 151-68.
33. Pawson, R. and N. Tilley (1997) Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE.
34. Saunders, M., B. Charlier and J. Bonamy (2005) Using Evaluation to Create Provisional Stabilities: Bridging Innovation in Higher Education Change Processes, Evaluation 11(1): 37-54.
35. Saunders, M., P. Trowler, P. Knight, J. Machell, S. Williams, N. Lent and A. Spencer (2006) Enhancing the Quality of Teaching and Learning in Scottish Universities: The Final Report of the First Evaluation of the Quality Enhancement Framework to the Scottish Funding Council's Quality Enhancement Framework Evaluation Steering Committee. Edinburgh: Scottish Further and Higher Education Funding Council. URL (consulted Sept. 2008): http://www.sfc.ac.uk/information/info_circulars/sfc/2007/sfc1107/sfc1107 .html
36. Saunders, M., J. Machell, S. Williams, D. Allaway, A. Spencer, P. Ashwin, P. Trowler, J. Fanghanel, L. Morgan and A. McKee (2008) 2005-2010 Centres of Excellence in Teaching and Learning Programme: Formative Evaluation Report to HEFCE. Lancaster: Centre for Education and Training/ Institution of Educational Technology. URL (consulted Sept. 2008): http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2008/rd08_08/
37. Schön, D.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books Inc.
38. Schön, D.A. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39. Sullivan, H., M. Barnes and E. Matka (2002) Building Collaborative Capacity through ©Theories of Change©: Early Lessons from the Evaluation of Health Action Zones in England, Evaluation 8(2): 205-26.
40. Trowler, P., J. Fanghanel and T. Wareham (2005) Freeing the Chi of Change: The Higher Education Academy and Enhancing Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Studies in Higher Education 30(4): 427-44.
41. van Aken, J.E. (2004) Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules, Journal of Management Studies 41(2): 219-46.
42. Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.