Value propositions for set-based design of reinforced concrete structures

Proceedings of IGLC16: 16th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 495-506

  Parrish, Kristen ^a   Wong, John Michael ^a   Tommelein, Iris D ^a,b   Stojadinovic, Bozidar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Project Production Systems Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Constructability; Cost; Design methodology; Lean construction; Performance based design; Rebar; Reinforced concrete; Set based design; Stakeholder value; Value proposition

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTABILITY; DESIGN METHODOLOGY; LEAN CONSTRUCTION; PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN; REBAR; STAKEHOLDER VALUES; VALUE PROPOSITION;

CONCRETE BUILDINGS; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; COSTS; ENGINEERS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; SUPPLY CHAINS;

REINFORCED CONCRETE;

EID: 69949089258     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. ACI (2005). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI. 432 pp.
2. th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Brighton, UK, 1-12.
3. Bennion, H. (2007). Personal communication, Rebar Placing Rates. PCS Steel, Inc., Fairfield, CA, September 18.
4. CRSI (2003). Manual of Standard Practice. Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute. Schaumburg, IL, p. 5-1.
5. CRSI (2006). "Ready Reference." Conc. Reinf. Steel Inst., Schaumburg, IL.
6. th Conf. of the Int'l. Group for Lean Construction, East Lansing, Michigan, 10 pp.
7. Isaac, S. and Navon, R. (2008). "Feasibility Study of an Automated Tool for Identifying the Implications of Changes in Construction Projects." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 134(2), 139-145.
8. Lichtig, W.A. (2006). "The Integrated Agreement for Lean Project Delivery." Construction Lawyer , 26 (3) Summer, American Bar Association, 8 pp., available at http://www.mhalaw.com/mha/newsroom/articles/ABA- IntegratedAgmt.pdf.
9. Mar, D. (2007). Personal communication, Tipping Mar + Assoc., Berkeley, CA, Jan. 16.
10. Matthews, O. and Howell, G.A. (2005). "Integrated Project Delivery." Lean Construction Journal, 2(1), 46-61.
11. Nawy, E.G. (2000). Reinforced Concrete: A Fundamental Approach. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 777 pp.
12. Olander, S. and Landin, A. (2005). "Evaluation of Stakeholder Influence in the Implementation of Construction Projects." Int'l. J. of Proj. Mgmt., 23(4), 321-328. (Pubitemid 40621265)
13. th Ann. Conf. of the International Group for Lean Construction, East Lansing, Michigan, 213-222.
14. Sobek, D. K., Ward, A., and Liker, J. K. (1999). "Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering." Sloan Management Review, 40(2), 67-83.
15. Ward, A. (2007). Lean Product and Process Development. Lean Enterprise Institute, Cambridge, MA. pp. 35-70
16. Ward, A., Liker, J.K., Cristiano, J.J., and Sobek, D.K. (1995). "The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster." Sloan Management Review, 36(3), 43-61.
17. Xu, Q.L., Ong, S.K., and Nee, A.Y.C. (2006). "Function-Based Design Synthesis Approach to Design Reuse." Research in Engineering Design, 17(1), 27-44. (Pubitemid 44421215)