Exploration of set-based design for reinforced concrete structures

Lean Construction: A New Paradigm for Managing Capital Projects - 15th IGLC Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 213-222

  Parrish, Kristen ^a   Wong, John Michael ^a   Tommelein, Iris D ^a   Stojadinovic, Bozidar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Design management; Design methodology; Lean construction; Product development; Product modelling; Production system design; Rebar; Reinforced concrete; Set based design

Indexed keywords

DESIGN MANAGEMENT; DESIGN METHODOLOGY; LEAN CONSTRUCTION; PRODUCT MODELLING; PRODUCTION SYSTEM DESIGNS; REBAR;

CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE; CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; REINFORCED CONCRETE;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84866094800     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Aganovic, D., Bjelkemyr, M., and Lindberg, B. (2004). "Applicability of Engineering Design Theories on Manufacturing System Design in the Context of Concurrent Engineering." Methods and Tools for Co-Operative and Integrated Design, 145-158.
2. American Concrete Institute (2005). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.
3. Ballard, G. (2000). "Positive vs. Negative Iteration in Design." Proc. 8th Ann. Conf. of the Int'l. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC-8), Univ. of Sussex, Brighton, UK, 44-55.
4. Castro-Lacouture, D. and Skibniewski, M.J. (2006). "Implementing a B2B e-Work System to the Approval Process of Rebar Design and Estimation." ASCE, J. Comp. in Civ. Engrg., 20(1), 28-37.
5. Finger, S. and Dixon, J.R. (1989a). "A Review of Research in Mechanical Engineering Design. Part I: Descriptive, Prescriptive, and Computer-Based Models of Design Processes." Res. Eng. Des., 1(1), 51-67.
6. Finger, S. and Dixon, J.R. (1989b). "Review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part II. Representations, analysis, and design for the life cycle." Res. Eng. Des., 1(2), 121-137.
7. Ford, D.N. and Sobek II, D.K. (2005). "Adapting Real Options to New Product Development by Modelling the Second Toyota Paradox." IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(2), 175-185.
8. Liker, J.K., Sobek II, D.K., Ward, A., and Cristiano, J.J. (1996). "Involving suppliers in product development in the United States and Japan: evidence for set-based concurrent engineering." IEEE Transactions on Engrg. Mgmt., 43(2), 165-178.
9. Lottaz, C., Clement, D.E., Faltings, B.V., and Smith, I.F.C. (1999). "Constraint-Based Support for Collaboration in Design and Construction." ASCE, J. Comp. in Civ. Engrg., 13(1), 23-35.
10. Nahm, Y. and Ishikawa, H. (2006). "A new 3D-CAD system for set-based parametric design." Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 29(1-2), 137-150.
11. Sobek II, D.K., Ward, A., and Liker, J.K. (1999). "Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering." Sloan Management Review, 40(2), 67-83.
12. Stephenson, J. and Callander, R.A. (1974). Engineering Design. Wiley & Sons, Australia.
13. Tommelein, I.D. and Ballard, G. (2005) "Restructuring the Rebar Supply System." Proc. Constr. Research Congress, San Diego, CA, 5-7 April, ASCE, Reston, VA, 10 pp.
14. Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (2004). Product Design and Development. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New York, NY.
15. Ward, A., Liker, J.K., Cristiano, J.J., and Sobek II, D.K. (1995). "The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster." Sloan Management Review, 36(3), 43-61.