Function-based design synthesis approach to design reuse

Research in Engineering Design

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 27-44

  Xu, Q L ^a   Ong, S K ^a   Nee, A Y C ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Design reuse; Design synthesis; Function; Multi objective optimization

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

DESIGN REUSE; DESIGN SYNTHESIS; MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 33748874308     PISSN: 09349839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00163-006-0015-5     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Andersson J, Wallace D (2002) Pareto optimization using the struggle genetic crowding algorithm. Eng Opt 34:623-644
2. Bobrow D, Falkenhainer B, Farquhar A,Fikes R, Forbus KD, Gruber TR, Iwasaki Y, Kuipers BJ (1996) A compositional modeling language. In: Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on qualitative reasoning. Menlo Park, AAAI Press, pp 12-21
3. Campbell M, Cagan J, Kotovsky K (1999) A-Design: an agent-based approach to conceptual design in a dynamic environment. Res Eng Des 11:172-192
4. Chakrabarti A, Bligh T (1996) An approach to functional synthesis of mechanical design concepts: theory, applications, and emerging research issues. Artifi Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 10:313-331
5. Campbell M, Cagan J, Kotovsky K (2000) Agent-based synthesis of electromechanical design configurations. J Mech Des 122:61-69
6. Chen W, Allen JK, Mavris DN, Mistree F (1996) A concept exploration method for determining robust top-level specifications. Eng Opt 26:137-158
7. Chidambaram B, Agogino AM (1999) Catalog-based customization. In: Proceedings of the 1999 ASME design engineering technical conferences, Paper No. DETC99/DAC-8675, Las Vegas, Nevada
8. Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, New York
9. Fonseca C, Fleming P (1998) Multiobjective optimization and multiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms - part I: a unified formulation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A: Syst Humans 28:26-37
10. Fujita K, Yoshioka S (2003) Optimal design methodology of common components for a class of products: its foundations and promise. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ASME design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conferences, Paper No. DETC2003/DAC-48718, Chicago
11. Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
12. Kirschman CF, Fadel GM (1998) Classifying functions for mechanical design. J Mech Des 120:475-482
13. Martin M, Ishii K (2002) Design for variety: developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures. Res Eng Des 13:213-235
14. McAdams DA, Stone RB, Wood KL (1999) Function interdependence and product similarity based on customer needs. Res Eng Des 11:1-19
15. Mittal S, Frayman F (1989) Towards a generic model of configuration tasks. In: Proceedings of the 11th international joint conference on artificial intelligence. Detroit, pp 1395-1401
16. Nelson SA, Parkinson MB, Papalambros PY (2001) Multicriteria optimization in product platform design. J Mech Des 123:199-204
17. Otto K, Wood KL (2001) Product design techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
18. Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design: a systematic approach. 2nd edn. Springer, London
19. Pratt MJ, Anderson BD (2001) A shape modeling applications programming interface for the STEP standard. Comput Aided Des 33:531-543
20. Pulm U, Lindemann U (2001) Enhanced systematics for functional product structuring. In: Culley S et al. (eds) International conference on engineering design (ICED 01) design research - theories, methodologies and product modelling. Professional Engineering Publishing, pp 477-484
21. Rezayat M (2000) Knowledge-based product development using XML and KCs. Comput Aided Des 32:299-309
22. Simpson TW (1998) A concept exploration method for product family design. Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta
23. Simpson T, Maier J, Mistree F (2001) Product platform design: method and application. Res Eng Des 13:2-22
24. Stone RB, Wood K (2000) Development of a functional basis for design. J Mech Des 122:359-370
25. Stone RB, Wood KL, Crawford RH (2000a) Using quantitative functional models to develop product architectures. Des Stud 21:239-260
26. Stone RB, Wood KL, Crawford RH (2000b) A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures. Des Stud 21:5-31
27. Suh NP (2001) Axiomatic design - advances and applications. Oxford University Press, New York
28. Szykman S, Sriram RD, Bochenek C, Racz J (1998) The NIST design repository project. In: Roy R, Furuhashi T, Chawdhry PK (eds) Advances in soft computing - engineering design and manufacturing. Springer, London, pp 5-19
29. Szykman S, Racz JW, Sriram RD (1999) The representation of function in computer-based design. In: Proceedings of the 1999 ASME design engineering technical conferences, Paper No. DETC99/DFM-8742, Las Vegas
30. Szykman S, Fenves SJ, Keirouz W, Shooter SB (2001) A foundation for interoperability in next generation product development systems. Comput Aided Des 33:545-559
31. Yu B, MacCallum K (1995) Modelling of product configuration design and management by using product structure knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 1st international federation for information processing working group 5.2 workshop on knowledge intensive CAD (KIC-1), Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki
32. Zamirowski EJ, Otto KN (1999) Identifying product family architecture modularity using function and variety heuristics. In: Proceedings of the 1999 ASME design engineering technical conferences, Paper No. DETC99/ DTM-8760, Las Vegas