Differences between ‘research in design context’ and ‘design inclusive research’ in the domain of industrial design engineering

Journal of Design Research

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 61-83

  Horváth, Imre ^a  

^a FACULTY OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ENGINEERING   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

design inclusive research; design research; framing methodologies; industrial design engineering; research in design context

Indexed keywords

EID: 69849117866     PISSN: 17483050     EISSN: 15691551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/JDR.2008.018777     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Archer, B.L. (1995) ‘Nature of design research’, Co-Design, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.6–13.
2. Barab, S. and Squire, K. (2004) ‘Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground’, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp.1–14.
3. Biggs, M. (2002) ‘The role of the artefact in art and design research’, International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp.19–24.
4. Buchanan, R. (2001) ‘Design research and the new learning’, Design Issues, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp.3–23.
5. Cross, N. (1993) ‘Science and design methodology: a review’, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.63–69.
6. Cross, N., Naughton, J. and Walker, D. (1981) ‘Design method and scientific method’, Design Studies, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp.195–201.
7. Cuartielles, D. (2004) ‘Design research: the Darwinian evolution of contemporary thought species’, in P. Ehn and J. Löwgren (Eds), Design [x] Research: Essays on Interaction Design as Knowledge Construction, Malmö University, pp.21–36.
8. Desmet, P. (2002) ‘Designing emotions’, doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, pp.1–231.
9. Edelson, D.C. (2001) ‘Design research: what we learn when we engage in design’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.105–121.
10. Fallman, D. (2007) ‘Why research-oriented design isn’t design-oriented research’, Proceedings of the NoordDesign Conference 2007, pp.1–5.
11. Findeli, A. (2001) ‘Rethinking design education for the 21st century: theoretical, methodological and ethical dimensions’, Design Issues, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp.5–17.
12. Frayling, C. (1993) ‘Research in art and design’, Royal College of Art Research Papers, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp.1–5.
13. Friedman, K. (2003) ‘Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods’, Design Studies, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp.507–522.
14. Glanville, R. (1980) ‘Why design research? ‘, in R. Jacques and A. Powell (Eds), Design: Science: Method, Guildford: Westbury House, pp.86–94.
15. Glanville, R. (1999) ‘Researching design and designing research’, Design Issues, Vol. 15, No. 9, pp.80–92.
16. Gribnau, M.W. (1999) ‘Two-handed interaction in computer supported 3D conceptual modeling’, doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, pp.1–208.
17. Horváth, I. (2004) ‘A treatise on order in engineering design research’, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp.151–185.
18. Horváth, I. (2006) ‘Design inclusive research’, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Design and Production, 5–8 September, Kusadasi, Turkey, pp.1–15.
19. Horváth, I. (2007) ‘Comparison of three methodological approaches of design research’, Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design – ICED ‘07, 28–31 August, Paris, CD-ROM Paper #341, pp.1–11.
20. Hummels, C. (2000) ‘Gestural design tools: prototypes, experiments and scenarios’, doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, pp.1–235.
21. Jonas, W. (2006) ‘Research through design through research: a problem statement and a conceptual sketch’, Working paper for the International DRS Wonderground Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
22. Keller, A.I. (2005) ‘For inspiration only’, doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, pp.1–175.
23. Landin, H. (2005) ‘Relating theory and practice in the design research discourse’, Proceedings of Nordic Design Research Conference – In the making, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp.1–8.
24. March, S.T. and Smith, G.F. (1995) ‘Design and natural science research on information technology’, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp.251–266.
25. Mitchell, C.T. (1993) Redefining Designing: From Form to Experience, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
26. Overbeeke, C.J. and Forlizzi, J. (2005) ‘Creativity and design: What the established teaches us’, in P. Locher, C. Martindale and L. Dorfman (Eds), New Directions in Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company, pp.137–154.
27. Phillips, E. and Pugh, D. (1987) How to Get a PhD: A Handbook for PhD Students and Their Supervisors, Buckingham: Open University Press.
28. Rusák, Z. (2003) ‘Vague discrete interval modeling for product conceptualisation in collaborative virtual design environments’, doctoral dissertation, Millpress, Rotterdam, pp.1–159.
29. Saikaly, F. (2004) ‘Doctoral research in design towards the designerly way’, doctoral dissertation, Politecnico de Milano, pp.1–147.
30. Snelders, H.M. (1995) ‘Subjectivity in the consumer’s judgment of products’, doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, pp.1–204.
31. Wensveen, S. (2005) ‘A tangibility approach to affective interaction’, doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, pp.1–206.
32. Westendorp, P. (2002) ‘Presentation media for product interaction’, doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, pp.1–221.
33. Zeisedl, J. (2006) Inquiry by Design, New York: W.W. Norton and Company.