Is it really that difficult to parse German?

COLING/ACL 2006 - EMNLP 2006: 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 111-119

  Kübler, Sandra ^a   Hinrichs, Erhard W ^a   Maier, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FORESTRY;

COMPARATIVE STUDIES; DEPENDENCY MODEL; LEXICALIZATION; STANFORD; TREEBANKS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 69849099248     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1610075.1610093     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Michael Collins. 1999. Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Erich Drach. 1937. Grundgedanken der Deutschen Satzlehre. Diesterweg, Frankfurt/M.
3. Amit Dubey and Frank Keller. 2003. Probabilistic parsing for German using sister-head dependencies. In Proceedings of ACL 2003, pages 96-103, Sapporo, Japan.
4. Amit Dubey. 2005. What to do when lexicalization fails: Parsing German with suffix analysis and smoothing. In Proceedings of ACL 2005, Ann Arbor, MI.
5. Oskar Erdmann. 1886. Grundzüge der deutschen Syntax nach ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung dargestellt. Verlag der Cotta'schen Buchhandlung, Stuttgart, Germany.
6. Anette Frank, Markus Becker, Berthold Crysmann, Bernd Kiefer, and Ulrich Schäfer. 2003. Integrated shallow and deep parsing: TopP meets HPSG. In Proceedings of ACL 2003, Sapporo, Japan.
7. Tilman Höhle. 1986. Der Begriff "Mittelfeld", Anmerkungen über die Theorie der topologischen Felder. In Akten des Siebten Internationalen Germanistenkongresses 1985, pages 329-340, Göttingen, Germany.
8. Dan Klein and ChristopherManning. 2003a. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of ACL 2003, pages 423-430, Sapporo, Japan.
9. Dan Klein and Christopher Manning. 2003b. Fast exact inference with a factored model for natural language parsing. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15 (NIPS 2002), pages 3-10, Vancouver, Canada.
10. Sandra Kübler. 2005. How do treebank annotation schemes influence parsing results? Or how not to compare apples and oranges. In Proceedings of RANLP 2005, Borovets, Bulgaria.
11. Roger Levy and Christopher Manning. 2003. Is it harder to parse Chinese, or the Chinese treebank? In Proceedings of ACL 2003, pages 439-446, Sapporo, Japan.
12. Wolfgang Maier. 2006. Annotation schemes and their influence on parsing results. In Proceedings of the ACL-2006 Student Research Workshop, Sydney, Australia.
13. Michael Schiehlen. 2004. Annotation strategies for probabilistic parsing in German. In Proceedings of COLING 2004, Geneva, Switzerland.
14. Helmut Schmid. 2000. LoPar: Design and implementation. Technical report, Universität Stuttgart, Germany.
15. Sabine Schulte im Walde. 2003. Experiments on the Automatic Induction of German Semantic Verb Classes. Ph.D. thesis, Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart.
16. Wojciech Skut, Brigitte Krenn, Thorsten Brants, and Hans Uszkoreit. 1997. An annotation scheme for free word order languages. In Proceedings of ANLP 1997,Washington, D.C.
17. Heike Telljohann, Erhard W. Hinrichs, Sandra Kübler, and Heike Zinsmeister, 2005. Stylebook for the Tübingen Treebank of Written German (TüBa-D/Z). Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Tübingen, Germany.
18. Tylman Ule. 2003. Directed treebank refinement for PCFG parsing. In Proceedings of TLT 2003, Växjö, Sweden.