Bone remodeling adjacent to morse cone-connection implants with platform switch: A fluorescence study in the dog mandible

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 257-266

  De Oliveira, Rafael R ^a   Novaes Jr , Arthur B ^a   Taba Jr , Mário ^a   Papalexiou, Vula ^b   Muglia, Valdir A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bone remodeling; Dental implants; Dogs; Fluorescence; Microscopy

Indexed keywords

CALCEIN GREEN; FLUORESCEIN DERIVATIVE; FLUORESCENT DYE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REMODELING; DOG; HISTOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; MALE; MANDIBLE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANIMALS; BONE REMODELING; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DOGS; FLUORESCEINS; FLUORESCENT DYES; MALE; MANDIBLE; RANDOM ALLOCATION;

EID: 69849097990     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Brånemark P-l, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. i. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100.
2. Schroeder A, Van Der Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F.The reaction of bone, connective tissue and epithelium to endosteal implants with sprayed titanium surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg 1981;9:15-25.
3. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, et al.The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-153.
4. Gatti C, Haefliger W, Chiapasco M. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading: A prospective study of ITI implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:383-388.
5. Testori T, Szmukler-Moncler S, Francetti L, et al. Immediate loading of Osseotite implants: A case report and histologic analysis after 4 months of occlusal loading. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:451-459.
6. Piattelli A, Corigliano M, Scarano A, Costigliola G, Paolantonio M. Immediate loading of titanium plasma-sprayed implants: An histologic analysis in monkeys. J Periodontol 1998;69: 321-327.
7. Corso M, Sirota C, Fiorellini J, Rasool F, Szmukler-Moncler S, Weber HP.CIinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded free-standing dental implants with various coatings in beagle dogs. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:428-435.
8. Romanos G,Toh CG, Siar CH, et al. Peri-implant bone reactions to immediately loaded implants. An experimental study in monkeys. J Periodontol 2001;72:506-511.
9. Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran D. Mechanical loading of BrSnemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994,9:343-360.
10. Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: A 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:69-75.
11. Fritton SP, McLeod KJ, Rubin CT. Quantifying the strain history of bone: Spatial uniformity and self-similarity of low-magnitude strains.J Biomech 2000;33:317-325.
12. Suzuki K, Aoki K, Ohya K. Effects of surface roughness of titanium implants on bone remodeling activity of femur in rabbits. Bone 1 997;21:507-514.
13. Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL.The causes of early implant bone loss: Myth or science? J Periodontol 2002;73:322-333.
14. Scarano A, Assenza B, Piattelli M, et al. Interimplant distance and crestal bone resorption: A histologic study in the canine mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:150-156.
15. Novaes AB Jr, Vidigal GM Jr, Novaes AB, Grisi MF, Polloni S, Rosa A. Immediate implants placed into infected sites: A histomor-phometric study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:422-427.
16. Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P.The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol 1992;63:995-996.
17. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undercalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissue. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:318-326.
18. Knöffler W, Graf HL,GröschelT,LowickeG. Bone reaction caused by biomaterials. Zeit Zanha'rztl Implantol 1990;6: 145-152.
19. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR.The long- term efficacy of currentely used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria for success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
20. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postoperative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:9-17.
21. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U.Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (ll).Etiopathogenesis [review]. Eur J Oral Sci 1998,106: 721-764. (Pubitemid 128736235)
22. Langer B, Langer L, Herrmann I, Jorneus L The wide fixture: A solution for special bone situations and a rescue for the compromised implant.Part l.lnt J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:400-408.
23. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-111.
24. Cardaropoli G, Wennstrom JL, Lekholm U. Peri-implant bone alterations in relation to inter-unit distances. A 3-year retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:430-436.
25. de Oliveira RR, Novaes AB Jr, Papalexiou V, Muglia VAJaba M Jr. Influence of interimplant distance on papilla formation and bone resorption: A clinical-radiographic study in dogs. J Oral Implantol 2006;32:218-227.
26. Novaes AB Jr, de Oliveira RR, Muglia VA, Papalexiou V.Taba M. The effects of interimplant distances on papilla formation and crestal resorption in implants with a Morse cone connection and a platform switch: A histomorphometric study in dogs. J Periodontol 2006;77:1839-1849.
27. Sun TC, Mori S, Roper J, Brown C, Hooser T, Burr DB. Do different fluorochrome labels give equivalent histomorphometric information? Bone 1992;13:443-446.
28. Listgarten MA, Lang NP, Schroeder HE, Schroeder A. Periodontal tissues and their counterparts around endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:1-19.
29. Stanford CM, Schneider GB. Functional behaviour of bone around dental implants. Gerodontology 2004 ;21:71-77.
30. Mullender MG, Huiskes R.Osteocytes and bone lining cells: Which are the best candidates for mechanosensors in cancellous bone? Bone 1997;20:527-532.
31. Owan I, Burr DB,Turner CH.etal.Mechanotransduction in bone: Osteoblasts are more responsive to fluid forces than mechanical strain. Am J Physiol 1997;273:C810-C815.
32. Frost HM. Structural adaptations to mechanical usage. A proposed "three-way rule"for bone modeling. Part I. Vet Comp Orthopaed Traumatol 1988a;1:7-17.
33. Frost HM. Structural adaptations to mechanical usage. A proposed "three-way rule" for bone modeling. Part II. Vet Comp Orthopaed Traumatol 1988;2:80-85.
34. Frost HM. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff's law:The bone modeling problem. Anat Rec 1990;226:403-413.
35. Frost HM. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 2. Redefining Wolff's law:The remodeling problem. Anat Rec 1990;226:414-422.
36. Frost HM.Why do marathon runners have less bone than weight lifters? A vital-biomechanical view and explanation. Bone 1997;20:183-189.
37. Skedros JG, Bloebaum RD, Mason MW, Bramble DM. Analysis of a tension/compression skeletal system: Possible strain-specific differences in the hierarchical organization of bone. Anat Rec 1994;239:396-404.
38. Skedros JG, Mason MD, Bloebaum RD. Differences in osteonal micromorphologies between tensile and compressive cortices of a bending skeletal system: Indications of potential strain-specific differences in bone microstructure. Anat Rec 1994;239:405-413.
39. Holmes DC, Loftus JT. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. J Oral Implantol 1997;23:104-111.
40. Stegaroiu R, SatoT, Kusakari H, Miyakawa O. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:82-90. (Pubitemid 128505830)