Myopia genetics: A review of current research and emerging trends

Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 356-362

  Hornbeak, Dana M ^a,b   Young, Terri L ^a,b,c  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DUKE NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Singapore)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY EYE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Candidate genes; Epidemiology; Genetics; Mapping studies; Myopia

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN TYPE 1; COLLAGEN TYPE 2; EARLY GROWTH RESPONSE FACTOR 1; FRIZZLED PROTEIN; LUMICAN; MEMBRANE TYPE FRIZZLED RELATED PROTEIN; SCATTER FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR PAX6; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX2; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT INHERITANCE; CYTOGENETICS; DISEASE SEVERITY; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; EYE DEVELOPMENT; EYE REFRACTION; GENE; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; HUMAN; MYOCILIN MYOPIA SUSCEPTIBILITY GENE; MYOPIA; NONHUMAN; ONSET AGE; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TWINS; UROMODULIN LIKE 1 GENE;

ANIMALS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); MYOPIA;

EID: 69749125755     PISSN: 10408738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32832f8040     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Pararajasegaram R. VISION 2020-the right to sight: from strategies to action. Am J Ophthalmol 1999; 128:359-360. (Pubitemid 29413235)
2. Vitale S, Ellwein L, Cotch MF, et al. Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999-2004. Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126:1111-1119. The nationally representative 1999-2004 NHANES documents age-standardized prevalence of hyperopia, myopia, and astigmatism in the United States: 3.6, 33.1, and 36.2%, respectively. Myopia was more prevalent in women than in men among 20-39-year-old participants, and in non-Hispanic whites than in non-Hispanic blacks or Mexican Americans; persons 60 years or older were less likely to have myopia and more likely to have hyperopia and/or astigmatism than younger persons. These data are invaluable for any epidemiological or public health evaluation of myopia in the United States.
3. Kempen J, Mitchell P, Lee K, Tielsch J. The prevalence of refractive error among adults in the United States, western Europe, and Australia. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122:495-505. (Pubitemid 38456284)
4. Young TL, Metlapally R, Shay A. Complex trait genetics of refractive error. Arch Ophthalmol 2007; 125:38-48. (Pubitemid 46072374)
5. Saw SM, Chua WH, Hong CY, et al. Near-work in early-onset myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43:332-339.
6. Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J, et al. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology 2008; 115:1279-1285. This is a central study in the recent research on outdoor activity and myopia. It found significant protective associations of outdoor activity and myopia and no effect of indoor sport on myopia. This implicated higher levels of total time spent outdoors, rather than sport itself, as the essential protective factor.
7. Rose KA, Morgan IG, Smith W, et al. Myopia, lifestyle, and schooling in students of Chinese ethnicity in Singapore and Sydney. Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126:527-530. This valuable comparative study examines age-matched and ethnicity-matched children in Sydney and Singapore and finds that the higher myopia prevalence in Singapore is correlated with less time spent outdoors, even despite greater book reading and more near-work activity in the Sydney children. These findings help separate genetic and environmental risk factors for myopia and confirm the protective role of outdoor activity in myopia development. (Pubitemid 351549847)
8. Dirani M, Tong L, Gazzard G, et al. Outdoor activity and myopia in Singapore teenage children. Br J Ophthalmol 2009. [Epub ahead of print] This study reports an association between outdoor activity and less myopic refraction and shorter axial length, confirming the Australian data by Rose et al.
9. Ip JM, Rose KA, Morgan IG, et al. Myopia and the urban environment: findings in a sample of 12-year-old Australian school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49:3858-3863. This study confirms previous reports of rural-urban differences in myopia prevalence. It is the first to show a difference in odds of myopia between children in inner-city urban areas compared with outer suburban areas, which are both within a predominantly urban environment; this suggests that even moderate environmental differences may affect myopia development.
10. Gwiazda J, Hyman L, Hussein M, et al. A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses versus single vision lenses on the progression of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44:1492-1500. (Pubitemid 36378573)
11. Zhu G, Hewitt AW, Ruddle JB, et al. Genetic dissection of myopia: evidence for linkage of ocular axial length to chromosome 5q. Ophthalmology 2008; 115:1053-1057. (Pubitemid 351749688)
12. Dirani M, Shekar SN, Baird PN. Adult-onset myopia: the Genes in Myopia (GEM) twin study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49:3324-3327. This large cohort study of white twins is the first to provide evidence for a genetic component in adult-onset myopia. The study found a significantly higher monozygotic intrapair correlation compared with that in dizygotic twins for spherical equivalent in twins with adult-onset myopia.
13. He M, Hur YM, Zhang J, et al. Shared genetic determinant of axial length, anterior chamber depth, and angle opening distance: the Guangzhou Twin Eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49:4790-4794. This study estimated the genetic and environmental contributions to axial length, ACD, and angle opening distance in twins recruited from the Guangzhou Twin Registry. The data suggest that shared genes are responsible for the significant phenotypic correlations for these parameters.
14. Schwartz M, Haim M, Skarsholm D. X-linked myopia: Bornholm eye disease. Linkage toDNA markers on the distal part of Xq. Clin Genet 1990; 38:281-286.
15. Young TL, Deeb SS, Ronan SM, et al. X-linked high myopia associated with cone dysfunction. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122:897-908.
16. Michaelides M, Johnson S, Bradshaw K, et al. X-linked cone dysfunction syndrome with myopia and protanopia. Ophthalmol 2005; 112:1448-1454. (Pubitemid 41074638)
17. Young TL, Ronan SM, Drahozal LA, et al. Evidence that a locus for familial high myopia maps to chromosome 18p. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63:109-119. (Pubitemid 30428325)
18. Lam DS, Tam PO, Fan DS, et al. Familial high myopia linkage to chromosome 18p. Ophthalmologica 2003; 217:115-118.
19. Heath S, Robledo R, Beggs W, et al. A novel approach to search for identity by descent in small samples of patients and controls from the same Mendelian breeding unit: a pilot study on myopia. Hum Hered 2001; 52:183-190. (Pubitemid 33079280)
20. Young TL, Ronan S, Alvear A, et al. A second locus for familial high myopia on chromosome 12q. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63:1419-1424. (Pubitemid 30418539)
21. Pang CP, Lam CY, Tam PO, et al. Poster 1397-2007 American Society of Human Genetics Meeting, 2007.
22. Nürnberg G, Jacobi FK, Broghammer M, et al. Refinement of the MYP3 locus on human chromosome 12 in a German family with Mendelian autosomal dominant high-grade myopia by SNP array mapping. Int J Mol Med 2008; 21:429-438. This study of a German family with high myopia further refines the familial myopia candidate region on chromosomal band 12q14.3 to 12q21.31 (MYP3), which was identified in a six-generation German/Italian family by Young et al. in 1998. The new composite region narrows the original 30.1cM of the MYP3 interval to 6.8 cM, thus restricting the list of candidate genes to 25 genes. It also suggests genetic homogeneity of the MYP3-based condition in families that share the same ethnic and geographical background. (Pubitemid 351802637)
23. Farbrother JE, Kirov G, Owen MJ, et al. Linkage analysis of the genetic loci for high myopia on 18p, 12q, and 17q in 51 U.K. families. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45:2879-2885. (Pubitemid 39121813)
24. Naiglin L, Gazagne C, Dallongeville F, et al. A genome wide scan for familial high myopia suggests a novel locus on chromosome 7q36. J Med Genet 2002; 39:118-124. (Pubitemid 34146381)
25. Paluru P, Ronan SM, Heon E, et al. New locus for autosomal dominant high myopia maps to the long arm of chromosome 17. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44:1830-1836. (Pubitemid 36520269)
26. Stambolian D, Ibay G, Reider L, et al. Genomewide linkage scan for myopia susceptibility loci among Ashkenazi Jewish families shows evidence of linkage on chromosome 22q12. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 75:448-459. (Pubitemid 39095820)
27. Stambolian D, Ibay G, Reider L, et al. Genome-wide scan of additional Jewish families confirms linkage of a myopia susceptibility locus to chromosome 22q12. Mol Vis 2006; 12:1499-1505. (Pubitemid 46002463)
28. Klein AP, Duggal P, Lee KE, et al. Confirmation of linkage to ocular refraction on chromosome 22q and identification of a novel linkage region on 1q. Arch Ophthalmol 2007; 125:80-85. (Pubitemid 46072380)
29. Hammond CJ, Andrew T, Mak YT, Spector TD. A susceptibility locus for myopia in the normal population is linked to the PAX6 gene region on chromosome 11: a genomewide scan of dizygotic twins. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 75:294-304. (Pubitemid 38943872)
30. Stambolian D, Ciner EB, Reider LC, et al. Genome-wide scan for myopia in the Old Order Amish. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 140:469-476. (Pubitemid 41224838)
31. Zhang Q, Guo X, Xiao X, et al. A new locus for autosomal dominant high myopia maps to 4q22-q27 between D4S1578 and D4S1612. Mol Vis 2005; 11:554-560. (Pubitemid 41410221)
32. Paluru PC, Nallasamy S, Devoto M, et al. Identification of a novel locus on chromosome 2q for autosomal dominant high-grade myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46:2300-2307. (Pubitemid 43119472)
33. Chen CY, Stankovich J, Scurrah KJ, et al. Linkage replication of the MYP12 locus in common myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48:4433-4439. (Pubitemid 351260956)
34. Zhang Q, Guo X, Xiao X, et al. Novel locus for X linked recessive high myopia maps to Xq23-q25 but outside MYP1. J Med Genet 2006; 43:e20.
35. Wojciechowski R, Moy C, Ciner E, et al. Genomewide scan in Ashkenazi Jewish families demonstrates evidence of linkage of ocular refraction to a QTL on chromosome 1p36. Hum Genet 2006; 119:389-399.
36. Lam CY, Tam PO, Fan DS, et al. A genome-wide scan maps a novel high myopia locus to 5p15. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49:3768-3778. This is one of the first studies to complete a genome-wide scan in an Asian population; it identified a novel autosomal dominant high myopia locus on chromosome 5p15.33-p15.2 in three Hong Kong Chinese pedigrees.
37. Ciner E, Wojciechowski R, Ibay G, et al. Genomewide scan of ocular refraction in African-American families shows significant linkage to chromosome 7p15. Genet Epidemiol 2008; 32:454-463. This study maps the first quantitative trait locus for ocular refraction in an African-American population to chr.7p15. Given that previous studies on Europeanderived families have shown linkage to a nearby region, Ciner et al. suggest that the region may contain polymorphisms that mediate refraction across populations. The study also shows evidence of linkage for three additional regions on chromosomes 2p, 3p, and 10p.
38. Ciner E, Ibay G, Wojciechowski R, et al. Genome-wide scan of African-American and white families for linkage to myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147:512-517. This is the first study to show evidence of linkage of myopia to chromosome 20, and it does so in both white and African-American populations. The study also is the first to independently confirm the report by Hammond et al., mapping a myopia quantitative trait locus to chromosome 11.
39. Yang Z, Xiao X, Li S, Zhang Q. Clinical and linkage study on a consanguineous Chinese family with autosomal recessive high myopia. Mol Vis 2009; 15:312-318. Yang et al. performed the first clinical and linkage study of a consanguineous family with autosomal recessive high myopia (arHM) and identified the first locus implicated in arHM, at chromosome 14q22.1-q24.2.
40. Li Y-J, Guggenheim JA, Bulusu A, et al. An international collaborative family-based whole genome linkage scan for high-grade myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009. [Epub ahead of print]
41. Nishizaki R, Ota M, Inoko H, et al. New susceptibility locus for high myopia is linked to the uromodulin-like 1 (UMODL1) gene region on chromosome 21q22.3. Eye 2009; 23:222-229. This study investigates the position of the UMODL1, prioritized during the authors' previous whole genome case-control association analysis in Japanese highmyopia patients. They identify one significant SNP (rs2839471) within the frequent recombinant region within UMODL1 on chromosome 21q22.3 and suggest that this region may play a role in susceptibility to high myopia.
42. Nallasamy S, Paluru PC, Devoto M, et al. Genetic linkage study of high-grade myopia in a Hutterite population from South Dakota. Mol Vis 2007; 13:229-236. (Pubitemid 46306513)
43. Yu ZQ, Li YB, Huang CX, et al. A genome-wide screening for pathological myopia suggests a novel locus on chromosome 15q12-13. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2007; 43:233-238.
44. Young TL. Molecular genetics of human myopia: an update. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86:E8-E22. This review summarizes the prevalence, morbidity, and biological and environmental determinants of myopia. It also describes the process used in identifying four previous myopia loci and the recent results of the International High Myopia Consortium.
45. Wojciechowski RJ, Stambolian D, Ciner EB, et al. Genomewide linkage scans for ocular refraction and meta-analysis of four populations in the Myopia Family study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50:2024-2032. This article summarizes the results of a genome-wide linkage analysis of white and Old Order Amish populations and performs a meta-analysis combining these results with the group's previous linkage data in African-American and Ashkenazi Jewish populations. The data show suggestive evidence of linkage of ocular refraction to 12q24 and 4q21 in white families and to 5qter in Amish families. The meta-analysis confirms suggestive evidence of linkage to 4q21-22 adjacent to the previously reported MYP9 and MYP11 loci. Thus, this study supports the view that several genes play a role in refractive development across populations.
46. Schippert R, Burkhardt E, Feldkaemper M, Schaeffel F. Relative axial myopia in Egr-1 (ZENK) knockout mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48:11-17. (Pubitemid 47251379)
47. Zhou X, Shen M, Xie J, et al. The development of the refractive status and ocular growth in C57BL/6 mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49:5208-5214. This study provides a helpful record of refraction, corneal curvature, axial components, and the correlations between refraction and ocular growth during emmetropization in mice. Refraction was most myopic at day 25 and then changed in the hyperopic direction to reach a peak at 47 days.
48. Han W, Leung KH, Fung WY, et al. Association of PAX6 polymorphisms with high myopia in Han Chinese nuclear families. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50:47-56. This study demonstrates the association of several PAX6 variants with susceptibility to high myopia in southern Han Chinese, thereby suggesting that polymorphisms in the PAX6 locus may play a significant role in high myopia in this population.
49. Simpson CL, Hysi P, Bhattacharya SS, et al. The roles of PAX6 and SOX2 in myopia: lessons from the 1958 British birth cohort. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48:4421-4425.
50. Metlapally R, Li YJ, Tran-Viet KN, et al. Common MFRP sequence variants are not associated with moderate to high hyperopia, isolated microphthalmia, and high myopia. Mol Vis 2008; 14:387-393. The MFRP gene has been hypothesized to play a role in axial length regulation. This study of nonsyndromic high-myopia families shows no association between 16 MFRP SNPs and moderate-to-high hyperopia, microphthalmia/anophthalmia, or high myopia. Family-based association analysis also did not reveal any association between the 17 SNPs genotyped in the larger family data set for any refractive error type. Thus, the findings indicate that the MFRP gene may not play a role in regulating ocular axial length in these phenotypes.
51. Tang WC, Yip SP, Lo KK, et al. Linkage and association of myocilin (MYOC) polymorphisms with high myopia in a Chinese population. Mol Vis 2007; 13:534-544.
52. Vatavuk Z, Skunca Herman J, Bencić G, et al. Common variant in myocilin gene is associated with high myopia in isolated population of Korcula Island, Croatia. Croat Med J 2009; 50:17-22. This study confirmed an association between high myopia and a common variant in the myocilin gene in 19 individuals in Korcula Island, Croatia. The results must be interpreted with caution, as the study was relatively underpowered and had limited SNP coverage.
53. Hall NF, Gale CR, Ye S, Martyn CN. Myopia and polymorphisms in genes for matrix metalloproteinases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50:2632-2636. Hall et al. report an association between common myopia and polymorphisms in three genes coding for MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-9, enzymes that degrade matrix proteins and modulate scleral extensibility. In their population of white English individuals, risk of myopia increased progressively with dose of polymorphic alleles in these three genes.
54. Andrew T, Maniatis N, Carbonaro F, et al. Identification and replication of three novel myopia common susceptibility gene loci on chromosome 3q26 using linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping. PLoS Genet 2008; 4:e1000220. This is the first evidence of involvement of mitochondrial regulatory processes in myopia development. The authors confirmed evidence for linkage to chromosome 3q26 and conducted fine-scale association mapping. They identify three loci with putative common functional variants centered on MFN1, upstream from alternate-splicing SOX2OT and PSARL, and replicate these results in an independent sample. As MFN1 and PSARL both influence mitochondrial regulatory processes in the retina, these findings are surprising and may suggest a novel perspective of the molecular genetic basis of common myopia.
55. Metlapally R, Michaelides M, Bulusu A, et al. Evaluation of the X-linked high grade myopia locus (MYP1) with cone dysfunction and color vision deficiencies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 50:1552-1558. This study establishes the association between TEX28 CNVs and the MYP1 X-linked myopia phenotypes. It also reveals that a range of copies (one to five), not only three copies as previously thought, can produce the same phenotype.
56. Mutti DO, Cooper ME, O'Brien S, et al. Candidate gene and locus analysis of myopia. Mol Vis 2007; 13:1012-1019. (Pubitemid 47019434)
57. Olavarrieta L, Morales-Angulo C, del Castillo I, et al. Stickler and branchio-otorenal syndromes in a patient with mutations in EYA1 and COL2A1 genes. Clin Genet 2008; 73:262-267. Sequence analysis of three individuals with familial Stickler syndrome type I reveals a novel COL2A1 mutation (c.1468-1475delinsT) that accounts for the STL1 phenotype. This phenotype includes myopia, congenital vitreous anomaly, and orofacial, articular, and auditory manifestations. (Pubitemid 351228513)
58. Meredith SP, Richards AJ, Bearcroft P, et al. Significant ocular findings are a feature of heritable bone dysplasias resulting from defects in type II collagen. Br J Ophthalmol 2007; 91:1148-1151. (Pubitemid 47344887)
59. Inamori Y, Ota M, Inoko H, et al. The COL1A1 gene and high myopia susceptibility in Japanese. Hum Genet 2007; 122:151-157. (Pubitemid 47241780)
60. Nakanishi H, Yamada R, Gotoh N, et al. Absence of association between COL1A1 polymorphisms and high myopia in the Japanese population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50:544-550. This study is a follow-up to the Inamori et al. study in September 2007, which identified COL1A1 as a candidate gene for high myopia in a Japanese population. Using a tagging single nucleotide polymorphism (tSNP) approach, this study reveals no association between high myopia and the two SNPs identified in the paper by Inamori et al., suggesting that the genetic risk associated with this gene, if any, is weaker than originally reported.
61. Pertile KK, Schache M, Islam FM, et al. Assessment of TGIF as a candidate gene for myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49:49-54. This is the first study to evaluate the association of the TGIF gene with high myopia. The data revealed no significant association for either ocular biometric measures or refraction in a white population, indicating that TGIF is unlikely to play a major role in these values in whites. Thus, focus should turn to investigating other genes in the MYP2 linkage region or in other linkage regions.
62. Wang P, Li S, Xiao X, et al. High myopia is not associated with the SNPs in the TGIF, Lumican, TGFB1, and HGF genes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50:1546-1551. This study investigates the previously reported association between four SNPs in the TGIF, Lumican, TGFB1, and HGF genes and high myopia in Chinese individuals living in south-east China. The study genotypes these SNPs by restrict fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and finds no association between high myopia and these SNPs, providing a contrary view to the previous reports.