Knowledge transfer between globally dispersed units at BMW

Journal of Knowledge Management

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 27-41

  Schleimer, Stephanie ^a   Riege, Andreas ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Automotive industry; Knowledge transfer; Manufacturing systems; Multinational companies

Indexed keywords

EID: 69749114165     PISSN: 13673270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/13673270910931143     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. (2001), Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 107-36.
2. Argote, L. and Ingram, P. (2000), Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, Vol. 82 No. 1, pp. 150-69.
3. Barlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1989), Managing Across Borders: The Trans-National Solution, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Barner-Rassmusen, W. and Bjoerkman, I. (2002), Knowledge sharing between MNC units: a social capital perspective, paper presented at the 28th EIBA Conference Athens, Greece.
5. Belzowsky, B.M., Flynn, M.S., Richardson, B.S. and Sims, M.K. (2003), Harnessing knowledge: the next challenge to inter-firm cooperation in the North American auto-industry, The Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Vol. 3 Nos 1-2, pp. 9-29.
6. Bennett, R. and Gabriel, H. (1999), Organisational factors and knowledge management within large marketing departments: an empirical study, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 212-25.
7. Birkenshaw, J. (2001), Why is knowledge management so difficult?, Business Strategy Review, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 11-18.
8. Bjoerkman, I., Barner-Rassmusen, W. and Li, L. (2004), Managing knowledge transfer in MNCs: the impact of headquarters control mechanisms, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 443-55.
9. Blair, D.C. (2002), Knowledge management: hype, hope or help?, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53 No. 12, pp. 1019-28.
10. Bolino, A.V. (2001), A model of inter-subsidiary knowledge transfer effectiveness, presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference.
11. Bond, E.U., Walker, B.A., Hutt, M.D. and Reingen, P.H. (2004), Reputational effectiveness in cross-functional working relationships, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 44-60.
12. Burt, R.S. (1992), Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Burt, R.S. (1997), The contingent value of social capital, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 339-64.
14. Cantwell, J.A. and Mudambi, R. (2003), On the nature of knowledge creation in MNE subsidiaries: an empirical analysis using patent data, Department of Management and Global Business, Rutger Business School, Newark, NJ.
15. Cavusgil, S.T., Calantone, R.J. and Zhao, Y. (2003), Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capacity, The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 6-21.
16. Chini, T. and Ambos, B. (2005), Knowledge transfer processes in MNCs: enhancing the speed of knowledge transfer, paper presented at the 31st European International Business Academy Conference, BI Norwegian School of Management, Oslo, Norway.
17. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990), Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 1 No. 35, pp. 128-52.
18. Cooper, R.G. (1979), The dimensions of industrial new product success and failure, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43, pp. 93-103.
19. Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1986), An investigation into the new product process: steps, definitions, and impact, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 71-85.
20. Darr, E.D. and Kurtzberg, T.R. (2000), An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, Vol. 1 No. 82, pp. 28-44.
21. Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge: How Organisations Manage What they Know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
22. Dyer, J.H. and Singh, H. (1998), The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 660-79.
23. Dyer, W.G. and Wilkins, A.L. (1991), Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theories: a rejoinder to Eisenhardt, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 613-9.
24. Egelhoff, W. (1988), Organizing the Multinational. An information Processing Perspective, Ballinger, New York, NY.
25. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 3 No. 16, pp. 620-7.
26. Foss, N.J. and Pedersen, T. (2004), Organizing knowledge processes in the multinational corporation: an introduction, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 340-9.
27. Frishammar, J. and Hoerte, S.A. (2005), Managing external information in manufacturing firms: the impact on innovation performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 251-66.
28. Ghoshal, S. and Barlett, C.A. (1988), Creation, adoption, and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 365-88.
29. Ghoshal, S. and Bartlett, C.A. (1990), The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15, pp. 603-25.
30. Ghoshal, S., Korine, H. and Szulanski, G. (1994), Interunit communication in multinational corporations, Management Science, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 96-110.
31. Granovetter, M. (1973), The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78 No. 6, pp. 1360-80.
32. Granovetter, M. (1983), The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited, Sociological Theory, Vol. 1, pp. 201-33.
33. Granovetter, M. (1985), Economic action and social structure: a theory of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91 No. 3, pp. 481-510.
34. Griffin, A. and Hauser, J.R. (1992), Patterns of communications among marketing, engineering and manufacturing, Management Science, Vol. 38 No. 3, p. 360.
35. Griffin, A. and Hauser, J.R. (1996), Integrating R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 191-215.
36. Gupta, A.K. and Govindarajan, V. (2000), Knowledge flows within multinational corporations, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 473-96.
37. Gupta, A.K. and Wilemon, D.L. (1988), The credibility-cooperation connection at the R&D-marketing interface, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 20-31.
38. Gupta, A.K. and Wilemon, D. (1990a), Accelerating the development of technology-based products, California Management Review, Vol. 32, pp. 24-44.
39. Gupta, A.K. and Wilemon, D. (1990b), Improving marketing relations: R&D's perspective, R&D Management, Vol. 20, pp. 277-90.
40. Gupta, A.K., Raj, S.P. and Wilemon, D. (1985), The R&D-marketing interface in high-technology firms, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 12-24.
41. Hansen, M. (1999), The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 82-111.
42. Hansen, M. (2002), Knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies, Organization Science, Vol. 13 No. 3, p. 232.
43. Husted, K. and Michailova, S. (2002), Knowledge sharing in Russian companies with Western participation, Management International, Vol. 6, pp. 17-28.
44. Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Leidner, D.E. (1999), Communication and trust in global virtual teams, Organization Science, Vol. 10 No. 6, pp. 791-815.
45. Jassawalla, A.R. and Sashittal, H.C. (1998), An examination of collaboration in high-technology new product development processes, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 237-54.
46. Kahn, K.B. (1996), Interdepartmental integration: a definition with implications for product development performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 137-51.
47. Kahn, K.B. (2005), Department status: an exploratory investigation of direct and indirect effects on product development performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 22, pp. 515-26.
48. Katz, R. and Allan, T.J. (1982), Investigating the not-invented-here (NIH) syndrome: a look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups, R&D Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 7-20.
49. Kim, K., Park, J.-H. and Prescott, J.E. (2003), The global integration of business functions: a study of multinational business in integrated global industries, Journal of International Business, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 327-44.
50. Kostova, T. (1999), Transnational transfer of organizational practices: a contextual perspective, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 308-24.
51. Lane and Lubatkin (1998), Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 461-77.
52. Levinthal, D.A. and March, J.G. (1993), The myopia of learning, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, SPI/2, pp. 95-112.
53. Li, L. (2005), The effects of trust and shared vision on inward knowledge transfer in subsidiaries' intra- and inter-organizational relationships, International Business Review, Vol. 14, pp. 77-95.
54. McDermott, R. (1999), Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management, California Management Review, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 103-17.
55. Maltz, E., Souder, W.E. and Kumar, A. (2001), Influencing R&D/marketing integration and the use of market information by R&D managers: intended and unintented effects of managerial actions, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 69-82.
56. Menon, T. and Pfeffer, J. (2003), Valuing internal versus external knowledge: explaining the preference for outsiders, Management Science, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 497-513.
57. Michailova, S. and Husted, K. (2003), Knowledge-sharing hostility in Russian firms, California Management Review, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 59-77.
58. Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Bjoerkman, I., Fey, C.F. and Park, H.J. (2003), MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 34, p. 586.
59. Moenaert, R.K. and Souder, W.E. (1990), An information transfer model for integrating marketing and R&D personnel in new product development projects, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 91-107.
60. Moenaert, R.K., Souder, W.E., De Meyer, A. and Deschoolmeester, D. (1994), R&D-marketing integration mechanisms, communication flows, and innovation success, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 31-45.
61. Nonaka, I. (1994), A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organizational Science, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 14-37.
62. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge-creating Company, OUP, New York, NY.
63. Ottum, B.D. and Moore, W.L. (1997), The role of market information in new product success/failure, Journal of New Product Innovation Management, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 258-73.
64. Podolny, J.M. and Baron, J.S. (1997), Resources and relationships: social networks and mobility in the workplace, American Sociological Review, Vol. 5 No. 62, pp. 673-93.
65. Polzer, J.T., Crisp, C.B., Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Kim, J.W. (2004), Geographically-colocated subgroups in globally dispersed teams: a test of the faultline hypothesis, Harvard Business School - Working Papers 2003-2004, available at: www.hbs.edu/research/facpubs/workingpapers/papers2/0304/04-007.pdf
66. Riege, A. (2005), Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 18-35.
67. Schermerhorn, J.R., Hunt, J.G. and Osborn, R.N. (2003), Organizational Behaviour, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY.
68. Schlegelmilch, B.B. and Chini, T.C. (2002), Knowledge transfer between marketing functions in multinational enterprises: a conceptual model, International Business Review, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 215-32.
69. Schulz, M. (2001), The uncertain relevance of newness: organisational learning and knowledge flows, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 661-82.
70. Souder, W.E. (1981), Disharmony between R&D and marketing, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 10, p. 67.
71. Souder, W.E. (1988), Managing relations between R&D and marketing in new product development projects, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 6-19.
72. Spender, J.C. (1996), Organisational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory, Journal of Organisational Change Management, Vol. 9, pp. 34-9.
73. Szulanski, G. (1996), Exploring internal stickiness: impediments in the transfer of best practices within the firm, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, SPI 2, pp. 27-43.
74. Tellis, W. (1997), Application of case study methodology, The Qualitative Report, Vol. 3 No. 3.
75. Thompson, L.L. (2003), The Social Psychology of Organizational Behavior, Taylor and Francis Books, Inc., New York, NY.
76. Tsai, W. (2001), Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44 No. 5, pp. 996-1004.
77. Tsai, W. (2002), Social structure of 'coopetion' within a multiunit organization: coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing, Organization Science, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 179-90.
78. Weick, K. (1976), Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 1-19.
79. Yin, R. (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
80. Zahra, S.A. and George, G. (2002), Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 185-203.