Dissecting the effects of spinal fusion and deformity magnitude on quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 18, 2009, Pages

  Tsutsui, Shunji ^a   Pawelek, Jeff ^a   Bastrom, Tracey ^a   Lenke, Lawrence ^b   Lowe, Thomas ^c   Betz, Randal ^d   Clements, David ^d   Newton, Peter O ^a,c  

^a RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Woodridge Spine ^*  (United States)

^d CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Effect of deformity correction; Effect of spinal fusion; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFORMITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL CHILD; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINE FUSION;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 69749105625     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b2008f     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC, et al. The influence of spine and trunk deformity on preoperative idiopathic scoliosis patients' health related quality of life questionnaire response. Spine 2004;29:861-868
2. Tones M, Moss N, Polly DW. A review of quality of life and psychological issues in scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:3027-3038 (Pubitemid 46005893)
3. Payne WK, Ogilvie JW, Resnick MD. Does scoliosis have a psychological impact and does gender make a difference? Spine 1997;22:1380-1384 (Pubitemid 27268542)
4. Haher TR, Group JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multi-center study of 244 patients. Spine 1999;24:1435-1440
5. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC, et al. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine 2000;25:2381-2386
6. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:63-69 (Pubitemid 36070775)
7. Watanabe K, Hasegawa K, Hirano T, et al. Use of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 outcomes instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan, Part 1: comparison with non-scoliosis group: preliminary/limited review in a Japanese population. Spine 2005;30:1197-1201 (Pubitemid 40695931)
8. Bago J, Climent JM, Ey A, et al. The Spanish version of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: trans-cultural adaptation and reliability analysis. Spine 2004;29:1676-1680 (Pubitemid 39014848)
9. Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine 2005;30:2464-2468 (Pubitemid 41567613)
10. Bunge EM, Juttmann RE, de Kleuver M, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after treatment: short-term effects after brace or surgical treatment. Eur Spine J 2007;16:83-89 (Pubitemid 46147230)
11. Weigert KP, Nygaard LM, Christensen FB, et al. Outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after brace treatment and surgery assessed by means of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument 24. Eur Spine J 2006;15:1108-1117
12. Merola AA, Haher TR, Brkaric M, et al.Amulti-center study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome instrument. Spine 2002;27:2046-2051 (Pubitemid 35052554)
13. Andrea LP, Betz RR, Lenke LG, et al. Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 2000;14:1795-1802
14. Wilson PL, Newton PO, Wenger DR, et al. Multi-center study analyzing the relationship of a standardized radiographic scoring system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument. Spine 2002;27:2036-2040
15. Climent JM, Bago J, Ey A, et al. Validity of the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) patient questionnaire. Spine 2005;30:705-709 (Pubitemid 40388657)
16. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC, et al. Discrimination validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 2003;28:74-78
17. Harrington PR. Treatment of scoliosis: correction and internal fixation by spinal instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1962;44:591-610.
18. Danielsson AJ. What impact does spinal deformity correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis make on quality of life? Spine 2007;32:101-108
19. Negrini S, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, et al. Why do we treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? What we want to obtain and to avoid for our patients: SOSORT 2005 Consensus paper. Scoliosis 2006;1:4.
20. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Sratt KF, et al. Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50 year natural history study. JAMA 2003;289:559-567 (Pubitemid 37428627)
21. Hawes M. Impact of spine surgery on signs and symptoms of spinal deformity. Pediatr Rehabil 2006;9:318-339 (Pubitemid 44596150)
22. Bengtsson G, Fallstrom K, Jansson B, et al. A psychological ad psychiatric investigation of the adjustment of female scoliosis patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1974;50:50-59
23. Ascani E, Bartolozzi P, Logroscino CA, et al. Natural history of untreated IS after skeletal maturity. Spine 1986;11:784-789
24. MacLean WE, Green NE, Pierre CB, et al. Stress and coping with scoliosis: psychological effects on adolescents and their families. J Prosthet Orthot 1989;9:257-260
25. Dolan JA, MacEwen GD. Surgical treatment of scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1971;76:125-137
26. Cochran T, Irstam L, Nachemson A. Long-term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by Harrington rod fusion. Spine 1983;6:576-584 (Pubitemid 14244159)
27. Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Phersson K, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J 2001;10:278-288 (Pubitemid 32762771)
28. Andersen MO, Christensen SB, Thomsen K. Outcome at 10 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:350-354 (Pubitemid 43214778)
29. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989;10:407-415 (Pubitemid 20025670)
30. Berven S, Deviren V, Polly D, et al. Minimal clinically important difference in spinal deformity: defining a threshold of change that matters. Paper presented at: Scoliosis Research Society 40th Annual Meeting and Course. Miami, FL: Scoliosis Research Society; 2005:155.
31. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjonen T, et al. Comparison of long-term functional and radiologic outcome after Harrington instrumentation and spondylodesis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2002;27:170-180 (Pubitemid 34215558)
32. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003;28:70-73