Prostate specific antigen recurrence rates are low after radical retropubic prostatectomy and positive margins

Journal of Urology

Volumn 175, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 140-144

  Simon, Michael A ^a   Kim, Sandy ^a   Soloway, Mark S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Prostate; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Recurrence

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER RISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; GLEASON SCORE; HORMONAL THERAPY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOLOGIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; RECURRENCE RISK; REVIEW; SEMINAL VESICLE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 29144489454     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00050-9     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. J.A. Eastham, M.W. Kattan, E. Riedel, C.B. Begg, T.M. Wheeler, C. Gerigk Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens J Urol 170 2003 2292
2. H.A. Frazier, J.E. Robertson, D.F. Paulson Radical prostatectomy the pros and cons of the perineal versus retropubic approach J Urol 147 1992 888
3. L. Salomon, A.G. Anastasiadis, O. Levrel, R. Katz, F. Saint, A. de la Taille Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer Urology 61 2003 386
4. J.A. Wieder, M.S. Soloway Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer J Urol 160 1998 299
5. B. Guillonneau, H. El-Fettouh, H. Baumert, X. Cathelineau, J.D. Doublet, G. Fromont Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris Institute J Urol 169 2003 1261
6. S.J. Freedland, W.J. Aronson, M.K. Terris, C.J. Kane, C.L. Amling, F. Dorey Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy results from SEARCH database J Urol 169 2003 2136
7. J.I. Epstein Incidence and significance of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens Urol Clin North Am 23 1996 651
8. D.F. Paulson, A.R. Stone, P.J. Walther, J.A. Tucker, E.B. Cox Radical prostatectomy anatomical predictors of success or failure J Urol 136 1986 1041
9. L. Salomon, A.G. Anastasiadis, C.W. Johnson, J.M. McKiernan, E.T. Goluboff, C.C. Abbou Seminal vesicle involvement after radical prostatectomy predicting risk factors for progression Urology 62 2003 304
10. S.J. Freedland, W.J. Aronson, J.C. Presti Jr., C.J. Kane, M.K. Terris, D. Elashoff Should a positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy be pathological stage T2 or T3? Results from the SEARCH Database J Urol 169 2003 2142
11. R.K. Valicenti, I. Chervoneva, L.G. Gomella Importance of margin extent as a predictor of outcome after adjuvant radiotherapy for Gleason score 7 pT3N0 prostate cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58 2004 1093
12. A.J. Stephenson, S.F. Shariat, M.J. Zelefsky, M.W. Kattan, E.B. Butler, B.S. Teh Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy JAMA 291 2004 1325
13. L.D. True Surgical pathology examination of the prostate gland. Practice survey by American Society of Clinical Pathologists Am J Clin Pathol 102 1994 572
14. J.I. Epstein, G. Pizov, P.C. Walsh Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy Cancer 71 1993 3582
15. C.J. Diblasio, M.W. Kattan Use of nomograms to predict the risk of disease recurrence after definitive local therapy for prostate cancer Urology 62 suppl 2003 9
16. R.K. Valicenti, L.G. Gomella, C.A. Perez Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy a review of the issues and options Semin Radiat Oncol 13 2003 130
17. C.L. Amling, E.J. Bergstralh, M.L. Blute, J.M. Slezak, H. Zincke Defining prostate specific antigen progression after radical prostatectomy what is the most appropriate cut point? J Uro 165 2001 1146