The justificatory power of moral experience

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 234-237

  van Thiel, G J M W ^a   van Delden, J J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; METHODOLOGY; MORALITY;

DECISION MAKING; ETHICAL ANALYSIS; ETHICAL RELATIVISM; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; MORALS;

EID: 69749090047     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2008.026559     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgement. Psychol Rev 2001;108:814-34.
2. Woodward J, Allman J. Moral Intuition: its neural substrates and normative significance. J Physiol Paris 2007;101:179-202.
3. Cushman F, Young L, Hauser M. The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgement. Psychol Sci 2006;17:1082-9.
4. Widdershoven GAM. How to combine hermeneutics and wide reflective equilibrium? Med Health Care Philos 2007;10:49-52
5. Rawls J. A theory of justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1971: revised edition 1999.
6. Daniels N. Wide reflective equilibrium and theory acceptance in ethics. J Philos 1979;76:256-82.
7. van der Burg W, van Willigenburg T, eds. Reflective equilibrium. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
8. Ebbesen M, Pedersen B. Using empirical research to formulate normative ethical principles in biomedicine. Med Health Care Philos 2007;10:33-48.
9. van Delden JJM, van Thiel GJMW. Reflective equilibrium as a normative-empiricalmodel in bioethics. In: van der Burg W, van Willigenburg T, eds. Reflective equilibrium. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998:251-9.
10. van Thiel GJMW, van Delden JJM. The principle of respect for autonomy in the care of nursing home residents. Nurs Ethics 2001;8:419-31.
11. DePaul MR. Balance and refinement. Beyond coherence methods of moral inquiry. London/New York: Routledge, 1993:23-7.
12. Davis JK. Intuition and the junctures of judgement in decision procedures for clinical ethics. Theor Med Bioeth 2007;28:1-30.
13. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001:401-45.
14. van Willigenburg T. Inside the ethical expert. Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1991.
15. Woods M. A nursing ethic: the moral voice of experienced nurses. Nurs Ethics 1999;6:423-32.
16. van der Burg W. The importance of ideals. Philos Rev 1997;31:23-37.
17. Singer P. Ethics and intuitions. J Ethics 2005;9:331-52.
18. DeGrazia D. Common morality, coherence, and the principles of biomedical ethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2003;13:219-30.
19. Daniels N. Accountability for reasonableness: establishing fair process for priority setting is easier than agreeing on principles. BMJ 2000;321:1300-1.
20. Holm S. Background paper on article 14 of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights from a philosophical perspective. Report of the Meeting of the Working Group of IBC on Social Responsibility and Health (Annex V). UNESCO: 2008.
21. Horton K. Aid and bias. Inquiry 2004;47:545-61.
22. Scanlon TM. What we owe to each other. Belknap: Harvard University Press, 1998.
23. Sayre-McCord G. Coherentist epistemology and moral theory. In: Sinnott-Armstrong W, Timmons M, eds. Moral knowledge? New readings in moral epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996:137-89.
24. BonJour L. The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press, 1985:96.
25. van den Hoven MA. A claim for a reasonable morality. Utrecht: Zeno, 2006.
26. Nielsen K. On needing a moral theory. Metaphilosophy 1982;13:97-111.