Intuition and the junctures of judgment in decision procedures for clinical ethics

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-30

  Davis, John K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Casuistry; Decision procedure; Discursive justification; Heuristic; Intuition; Judgment; Moral epistemology; Moral theory; Principles; Principlism

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASUISTRY; EPISTEMOLOGY; ETHICAL DECISION MAKING; ETHICIST; INTUITION; JUSTICE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MORALITY;

DECISION MAKING; ETHICISTS; HUMANS; INTUITION; KNOWLEDGE; MORALS;

EID: 33947603644     PISSN: 13867415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11017-007-9027-z     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Terence Irwin. 2d ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1999.
2. Audi R. (2004) The Good in the Right. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3. Beauchamp T. L. (2000) Reply to Strong on Principlism and Casuistry. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25: 342-347.
4. Beauchamp T. L., James F. C. (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. BonJour L. (1998) In Defense of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. DeGrazia D. (1992) Moving Forward in Bioethical Theory: Theories, Cases, and Specified Principlism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17: 511-539.
7. Dworkin G. (2006) Theory, Practice, and Moral Reasoning. In: David C. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. (pp 624-644). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Gert B., Charles M. C., Danner C. K. (2006) Bioethics: A Systematic Approach. 2d. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Graber G. C., Thomasma D. T. (1989) Theory and Practice in Medical Ethics. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.
10. Jonsen A. R. (1995) Casuistry: An Alternative or Complement to Principles? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5(3): 237-251.
11. Jonsen A. R., Mark S., Winslade J. W. (2002) Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine. 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.
12. Kaebnick G. (2000) On the Intersection of Casuistry and Particularism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10(4): 307-322.
13. London A. J. (2001) Editor's Introduction: Theory and Engagement in Bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22: 65-68.
14. London A. J. (2001) The Independence of Practical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22: 87-105.
15. Mill J. S. "Utilitarianism" In Ethics: History, Theory, and Contemporary Issues. Edited by S. M. Cahn and P. Markie. 317-351. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006
16. Quante M., Andreas V. (2002) Defending Principlism Well Understood. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27: 621-649.
17. Rawls J. (1999) Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics. In: Samuel F. (eds) Collected Papers. (pp. 1-19). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
18. Rawls J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
19. Richardson H. S. (1997) Practical Reasoning About Final Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Richardson H. S. (2000) Specifying, Balancing, and Interpreting Bioethical Principles. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25(3): 285-307.
21. Richardson, H. S. Specifying Norms as a Way to Resolve Concrete Ethical Problems. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19 (Fall, 1990): 279-310.
22. Ross, W. D. (1988) The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1930. Reprint, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
23. Rudnick A. (2001) A Meta-Ethical Critique of Care Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22: 505-517.
24. Strong C. (1999) Critiques of Casuistry and Why They are Mistaken. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20: 395-411.
25. Strong C. (2000) Specified Principlism: What is it, and Does it Really Resolve Cases Better than Casuistry? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25: 323-341.