Interactive effects of distance and matrix on the movements of a peatland dragonfly

Ecography

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 715-722

  Chin, Krista S ^a   Taylor, Philip D ^a  

^a ACADIA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; DRAGONFLY; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; HABITAT TYPE; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; MOVEMENT; PEATLAND; SURFACE AREA;

CANADA; NEWFOUNDLAND; NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR; NORTH AMERICA;

ANISOPTERA (DRAGONFLIES); LEUCORRHINIA HUDSONICA;

EID: 69649096880     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05744.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Angelibert, S. Giani, N. 2003. Dispersal characteristics of three odonate species in a patchy habitat Ecography 26 : 13 20.
2. Baguette, M. et al. 2000. Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species within the same habitat network: consequences for conservation J. Appl. Ecol. 37 : 100 108.
3. Bowler, D. E. Benton, T. G. 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics Biol. Rev. 80 : 205 225.
4. Brown, J. H. Kodric-Brown, A. 1977. Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction Ecology 58 : 445 449.
5. Chin, K. S. 2006. Within peatland spatial structuring and the influence of the matrix on between peatland movement of the dragonfly, Leucorrhinia hudsonica, in western Newfoundland. Acadia Univ.
6. Conrad, K. F. et al. 1999. Dispersal characteristics of seven odonate species in an agricultural landscape Ecography 22 : 524 531.
7. Conrad, K. F. et al. 2002. Characteristics of dispersing Ischnura elegans and Coenagrion puella (Odonata): age, sex, size, morph and ecoparasitism Ecography 25 : 439 445.
8. Corbet, P. S. 1999. Dragonflies: behavior and ecology of Odonata. Cornell Univ. Press.
9. Cronin, J. T. 2003. Movement and spatial population structure of a prairie planthopper Ecology 84 : 1179 1188.
10. Dunning, J. B. et al. 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes Oikos 65 : 169 175.
11. Earn, D. J. D. et al. 2000. Coherence and conservation Science 290 : 1360 1364.
12. Fahrig, L. Paloheimo, J. E. 1986. Interpatch dispersal of the cabbage butterfly Can. J. Zool. 65 : 616 622.
13. Faraway, J. J. 2005. Linear models in R. Chapman and Hall.
14. Frankham, R. et al. 2003. Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge Univ. Press.
15. Goodwin, B. J. Fahrig, L. 2002. Effect of landscape structure on the movement behavior of a specialized goldenrod beetle, Trirhabda borealis Can. J. Zool. 80 : 24 35.
16. Gustafson, E. J. Gardner, R. H. 1996. The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization Ecology 77 : 94 107.
17. Hanski, I. Simberloff, D. 1997. The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation Hanski, I. A. Gilpin, M. E. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press 5 26.
18. Harrison, S. 1989. Long-distance dispersal and colonization in the Bay checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis Ecology 70 : 1236 1243.
19. Harrison, S. 1991. Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42 : 73 88.
20. Hilton, D. F. J. 1984. Reproductive behavior of Leucorrhinia hudsonica (Selys) (Odonata: Libellulidae) J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 57 : 580 590.
21. Holder, M. L. 2001. The influence of habitat structure on peatland Odonata at local and landscape spatial scales M.Sc. thesis, Acadia Univ.
22. Holt, R. D. 1990. The microevolutionary consequences of climate change Trends Ecol. Evol. 5 : 311 315.
23. ImageTool DevelopmentTeam. 2002. UTHSCSA ImageTool for Windows. The Univ. of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio.
24. Jonsen, I. D. Taylor, P. D. 2000. Fine-scale movement behaviors of calopterygid damselflies are influenced by landscape structure: an experimental manipulation Oikos 88 : 553 562.
25. Jonsen, I. D. et al. 2001. The influence of matrix habitat on Aphthona flea beetle immigration to leafy spurge patches Oecologia 127 : 287 294.
26. Jules, E. S. Shahani, P. 2003. A broader ecological context to habitat fragmentation: why matrix habitat is more important than we thought J. Veg. Sci. 14 : 459 464.
27. Krawchuk, M. A. Taylor, P. D. 2003. Changing importance of habitat structure across multiple spatial scales for three species of insects Oikos 103 : 153 161.
28. Lande, R. et al. 1999. Spatial scale of population synchrony: environmental correlation versus dispersal and density regulation Am. Nat. 154 : 271 281.
29. Larsen, K. W. Boutin, S. 1994. Movements, survival, and settlement of red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) offspring Ecology 75 : 214 223.
30. Liebhold, A. et al. 2004. Spatial synchrony in population dynamics Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35 : 467 490.
31. Matter, S. F. et al. 2003. The effects of isolation, habitat area and resources on the abundance, density and movement of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus Am. Midl. Nat. 150 : 26 36.
32. McCauley, S. J. 2007. The role of local and regional processes in structuring larval dragonfly distribution across habitat gradients Oikos 116 : 121 133.
33. McIntyre, N. E. Wiens, J. A. 1999. Interactions between landscape structure and animal behavior: the roles of heterogeneously distributed resources and food deprivation on movement patterns Landscape Ecol. 14 : 437 447.
34. McIvor, C. C. Odum, W. E. 1988. Food, predation risk, and microhabitat selection in a marsh fish assemblage Ecology 69 : 1341 1351.
35. McPherson, A. M. 2003. Between-patch movements of a peatland dragonfly (Leucorrhinia hudsonica), and the influence of landscape structure on its distribution and abundance in western Newfoundland M.Sc. thesis, Acadia Univ.
36. Miner, J. A. Taylor, P. D. 2002. Effects of peatland size and exposure on two species of Diptera inhabiting the pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea L Ecoscience 9 : 347 354.
37. Norris, D. R. 2005. Carry-over effects and habitat quality in migratory populations Oikos 109 : 178 186.
38. Pither, J. Taylor, P. D. 1998. An experimental assessment of landscape connectivity Oikos 83 : 166 174.
39. Purse, B. V. et al. 2003. Dispersal characteristics and management of a rare damselfly J. Appl. Ecol. 40 : 716 728.
40. R Development Core Team. 2006. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
41. Ricketts, T. H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes Am. Nat. 158 : 87 99.
42. Roland, J. et al. 2000. Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size Ecology 81 : 1642 1653.
43. Rouquette, J. R. Thompson, D. J. 2007. Patterns of movement and dispersal in an endangered damselfly and the consequences for its management J. Appl. Ecol. 44 : 692 701.
44. Schtickzelle, N. Baguette, M. 2003. Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes J. Anim. Ecol. 72 : 533 545.
45. Stettmer, C. 1996. Colonisation and dispersal patterns of banded (Calopteryx splendens) and beautiful demoiselles (C. virgo) (Odonata: Calopterygidae) in south-east German streams Eur. J. Entomol. 93 : 579 593.
46. Sutcliffe, O. L. et al. 1997. Correlated extinctions, colonizations and population fluctuations in a highly connected ringlet butterfly metapopulation Oecologia 109 : 235 241.
47. Switzer, P. V. 1997. Factors affecting site fidelity in a territorial animal, Perithemis tenera Anim. Behav. 53 : 865 877.
48. Taylor, P. D. et al. 2006. Landscape connectivity: back to basics Crooks, K. Muttulingam, S. Maintaining connections for nature. Cambridge Univ. Press 29 43.
49. Utzeri, C. et al. 1988. Aspects of demography in Lestes barbarus (Fabr.) and L. virens vestalis Ramb. (Zygoptera: Lestidae) Odonatologica 17 : 107 114.
50. Van Dyck, H. Baguette, M. 2005. Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: routine or special movements? - Basic Appl Ecol. 6 : 535 545.
51. Ward, D. Saltz, D. 1994. Foraging at different spatial scales: dorcas gazelles foraging for lilies in the Negev Desert Ecology 75 : 48 58.
52. White, G. C. Burnham, K. P. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals Bird Study 46 : S120 S138.
53. Zollner, P. A. 2000. Comparing the landscape level perceptual abilities of forest sciurids in fragmented agricultural landscapes Landscape Ecol. 15 : 523 533.